Skip to main content

Here are excerpts from Mate Cohen in a blog on "The New Republic" (now owned by Chris Hughes, one of the Facebook founder).

 

 

From messaging to ad placement, campaigns make critical decisions based on demographics and geography. Indeed, coverage of campaign decision-making and the ups and downs of the horserace are incomplete without accounting for these variables.

 

Demographics aren’t quite destiny, but they’ll play an outsized role in the 2012 presidential election. The Obama campaign is counting on repeating an unprecedented performance among non-white voters. If the Obama campaign succeeds, Romney will need to counter with a historic share of the white vote. Should non-white voters support Obama to the extent they did in 2008, Romney will need to compensate by winning 60 percent of the white vote while holding Obama to 38 percent.

 

In the modern political era, it has taken extraordinary circumstances for Democrats to do so poorly with whites. The last Democratic candidate to fall so low was Walter Mondale, who only won 35 percent of the white vote in 1984. (That said, to the extent that congressional elections can be used as a proxy, the 2010 midterms augur better for Romney: In 2010, House Democrats only won 37 percent of the white vote.) Recent polls confirm that Romney has a tough fight ahead. In polls conducted over the last month, Obama averages approximately 39 percent of the white vote—enough to secure victory, if his share of the non-white vote matches that of 2008—while Romney lags well behind his 60 percent target, holding at around 53 percent of the white vote.

 

Of course, just because Romney is in uncharted territory doesn’t mean he can’t conquer it. Given the prevailing political and economic climate, Romney will certainly have the opportunity to assemble the requisite number of votes—especially since there is no guarantee that non-white voters will turnout and support Obama as they did in 2008. Even if Romney is forced to deal with a worst case scenario, he can take solace knowing that old certainties are often cast aside in election campaigns. Indeed, the new precedents that emerge to take their place often seem, in retrospect, both easy and obvious. Since 1948, the GOP has made a veritable habit of breaking new electoral ground, whether it was Goldwater’s sweep of the Deep South after LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act, or George W. Bush’s victory in West Virginia in 2000.

 

There are still many unresolved questions that will be pivotal to the election. Will Obama’s young and diverse base turnout to the degree necessary to force Romney to make historic gains among whites? If Romney does need to win 60 percent of the white vote, who are the voters he will need to persuade? What are their backgrounds, beliefs, and aspirations and how does that influence campaign strategy? How does their distribution alter the electoral map?

Let us see.  Blacks will vote 95% for Obama but more of them will stay home, arguing that their lives arent improved and that Obama isnt even trying toi get their vote.

 

Hispanics will give him 60%+ but then they will resume not voting as they note that Obama has deported MORE undocumented than Bush, and his done almost nothing to regularize them.

 

Young kids are crushed with college loans, in substandard jobs and no longer see a man who inspires them.  They look at Obama and see a politician who will say what ever he thinks he should say to win votes, but then do otherwise once inj power.

 

Texas got 4 more seats in the Electoral College and all the states which lost seats are hard core Democratic states (NY, Michigan and others).;  GA also got 2 more (I think).  This gives the GOP 6 more seats even if the election map is the same as it was in 2008.  We do know that Indiana goes back to the GOP, and most likely NC as well.  OH is a toss up as is FL, still mired in the housing slump.

 

This will be an interesting election with two spineless poiticians trying to fool the public.

 

Obama is failing to raise cash to offset the superPACs. His Harvard buddies on Wall Street prefer Romney this year (Obama raised loads of cash from that source last time).  There are very few $25 brunches being arranged to "meet Michelle" as there were in the "Sistahs" netwoprk last time.  White liuberals felt they did their duty last time by voting for the first black presidxent, so dont feel obligated this time.So his grass roots fund raising is also impaired.

 

 

So lets hope that Obama makes Romney look foolish in the debates becase as I see it that is his only hope. The ecobomny is weakening so I dont see improvement sufficient to have impact by Sept/Oct when most people make up their minds.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×