any suggestions?

Turn them into eunuchs.

Send them to clean up Georgetown.    

waste of time . . . they already are

On the territory of Guyana, past PNC and PPP governments charged people for treason. I don't know whether the government has jurisdiction over Guyanese in the diaspora.

Having said that, not being a government supporter is no good reason to gloat over Venezuela's verbal attacks against the President of Guyana.

When I mentioned ages ago that GNI has a known traitor from Linden, some ppl raise their eyebrow. But he has been an active recruiting master on GNI. Dem getting orders from Jagdeo I reckon.

I guess you refer to the Venezuelan issue.  Well, the real traitor is dead, that PNC guy who accepted the 1966 clause insertion creating an opening for Venezuela to methodically deconstruct the 1899 decree, a clause objected to by the PPP.  Everyone else, one to now, are just reacting to events.

As I said, I don't in anyway support the claim however, Indians have been treated as unwanted occupiers in Guyana and many left so when they show no loyalty, its understandable.  I doubt though most who take this position really want a dismemberment of the nation.  One PNC guy said the PPP should leave the country and take their 49% with them.

lol

baseman trying to have it 3, maybe 4 ways at one time

ow bai, dat stunt only possible at dem private poolside parties de rat does throw

call kwamee fuh an invite

  Funny.  Most people visiting Guyana before May 11th saw a thoroughly Indo dominated society.  They saw blacks doing low and mid level jobs, answerable to Indo bosses in the public and private sector.

Now that Indo males no longer 100% dominate you advocate an invasion by Venezuela.

Bai, don't be a smart ass and "reinterpret" what i said, ok.  I never advocate and such move, I have stated I don't and think they can never though they will be a spoiler for the development of the region.  I was just giving a reason why many Indians don't feel loyal and have no care what Venez does.

And listen, I don't advocate Indian domination of all leadership spots, nor Afros either.  I'm on record on this site being critical of the overly "Indian face" of many key offices and external representation under the PPP, just as I was of the overly Afro face under the old PNC.

Base, This same FOOL made daily lectures on the "loyalty" of Afro Guyanese to leave for other Caribbean Islands!!!

So if even YOU admit that there was an overly Indian face, then why your screams that Indians are these unwanted and powerless refugees? Even now Indian elites are still quite powerful, as they dominate the economy.

Indians benefit from Guyana no less than Africans, so YOU need to ask yourself why under PPP rule, no Afro Guyanese sympathized with Venezuelan claims. 

Why do you, as a moderator, feel you have the right to judge who are traitors?  You are "moderation", who appointed you judge, jury and executioner?  Granger knows he is dealing with the legacy of a treacherous deal made by the old PNC.  The "bone in the throat" in a gift of his predecessors, that's where the real issue lies, not in some powerless individual making rhetorical statements.

You past leader was the greatest asset Venez ever had in Guyana.

On Indians, I said that is how they are/were treated.  Afros don't view Indians as having equal right to lead in Guyana.

And Indians view Africans as having an equal right to lead?

This is why you are a racist.  You scream one side and refuse to respect the rights of the other.

The fact that you need to address is, even under the PPP, when blacks were reduced to being 3rd class citizens, they remained fundamentally GUYANESE.   They didn't use their exclusion as an excuse not to be loyal to the territorial integrity of Guyana.

Your claim is that Indians can be indifferent about Venezuela's claims to Guyana.  Why after 23 years of PPP rule with an Indian face which even YOU admitted that existed?

Indian don't view African right to rule.

African don't view Indian right to rule.

Ok let the Amerindian rule problem solved.

Given the destabilisation efforts underway (which you acknowledge but are "not at liberty to divulge") I'd say alyuh don't feel black man has any right in governance either. Nah suh bai?