Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The Chairperson of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) has given an undertaking to the Court, orally and in the form of a sworn Affidavit, to conduct this recount. The Chairperson, a former Appellate Court Judge, has submitted to the Court that GECOM has made a decision to conduct this recount; she emphasized that GECOM has the constitutional power and mandate to carry out this recount. She reminded the Court that GECOM is an autonomous independent body, exclusively charged with the responsibility to conduct elections. She has pleaded a case for GECOM to be allowed to discharge that mandate and has confirmed that GECOM was in the process of so doing, when injuncted by the Court. She implores the Court to recognize that GECOM must at all times act with fairness and impartiality and that it is imperative that GECOM be allowed to do so in a manner that will continue to inspire public confidence in the electoral machinery and the results generated therefrom.....In such a circumstance, any Court that hinders the resolution of this dispute becomes part of the problem and not the solution. The fair, just and expedient thing for a Court to do in these circumstances, is to hold its hands, while the constitutional institution discharges its mandate"

 

FM
Image may contain: possible text that says 'PRESS RELEASE'
Bharrat Jagdeo<
 

PRESS STATEMENT

The ultimate objective of any judicial system is to resolve disputes in accordance with law. Any time a Court obstructs, rather than facilitate the resolution of a dispute before it, in any form or fashion, that Court would be departing from its conceptual role and indeed, its constitutional duty. The very survival of Guyana, as a Nation State, being part of the civilized and free world, is currently before the Courts of Guyana.

The quintessential issue of controversy is whether a recount of the ballots cast should be done. The law says that it is a mandatory facility available to any political party desirous of a recount. This request for a recount, made by eight (8) political parties, was denied for the most dubious reasons by a Returning Officer, whose credibility is damaged beyond redemption. Every major local organization has called for this recount. So, have all the political parties contesting the polls, including, the APNU+AFC. Every accredited international Observer Team has done similarly. Almost every diplomatic mission in Guyana and the Governments that they represent have called for this recount. CARICOM has gone as far as brokering an agreement between the President and the Leader of the Opposition to facilitate this recount and in this regard, an Aide Memoire was signed by the nation’s two foremost leaders to give effect to this recount.

The Chairperson of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) has given an undertaking to the Court, orally and in the form of a sworn Affidavit, to conduct this recount. The Chairperson, a former Appellate Court Judge, has submitted to the Court that GECOM has made a decision to conduct this recount; she emphasized that GECOM has the constitutional power and mandate to carry out this recount. She reminded the Court that GECOM is an autonomous independent body, exclusively charged with the responsibility to conduct elections. She has pleaded a case for GECOM to be allowed to discharge that mandate and has confirmed that GECOM was in the process of so doing, when injuncted by the Court. She implores the Court to recognize that GECOM must at all times act with fairness and impartiality and that it is imperative that GECOM be allowed to do so in a manner that will continue to inspire public confidence in the electoral machinery and the results generated therefrom.

The world has said to Guyana that no government, which assumes Office through the current declaration of the Region 4 results, would enjoy legitimacy and that a repertoire of sanctions will be unleashed upon Guyana, and personally against those who aided and abetted in the derailing of democracy at these elections.

Against this backdrop, why would a Court stand in the way of such an imminent resolution of the dispute before it by the authorized constitutional agency? In such a circumstance, any Court that hinders the resolution of this dispute becomes part of the problem and not the solution. The fair, just and expedient thing for a Court to do in these circumstances, is to hold its hands, while the constitutional institution discharges its mandate. After all, no Court has the jurisdiction to give legitimacy to that which is plainly illegitimate.

People’s Progressive Party

March 29th, 2020

FM
Last edited by Former Member
ksazma posted:

Why would the PNC agree to a Coalition government with the PPP if they won the elections?

It’s called bullyism, wrong and strong.  PNC second nature.

Inagine if the court operated on the principle that the accused will decide on the judge and jury and even the rules of trial.

This is what the PNC proposing, nothing short of the law of the jungle!

Their allies here in the Black caucuses pushing that agenda for them. 

Baseman

Dude, you are one rude person, I dont know why Django put up with your  shit, you are constantly cussing and carrying on like a godam drunkard. Can't you find a dam PPP board and go there and cuss up the opposition all you want? They will tolerate that bullshit. Better yet, be a man, go on a PNC board they seem to be into those runnings also.

cain
Last edited by cain
cain posted:

Dude, you are one rude person, I dont know why Django put up with your  shit, you are constantly cussing and carrying on like a godam drunkard. Can't you find a dam PPP board and go there and cuss up the opposition all you want? They will tolerate that bullshit. Better yet, be a man, go on a PNC board they seem to be into those runnings also.

Post removed.

Django

What could possibly happen in April? Indications are that the stubborn wrong-strong PNC is ready to swear-in DAG without a GECOM recount. All hell will break loose after that. The ABCE and other countries and the influential OAS and other multilateral forces won't recognize that DAG government. International political and economic pressure will descend on the DAGs. 

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×