So what's your prediction about the PPP filing a petition in the courts to challenge the election results?
I say they are not going to. They cannot afford to lose in court. They intend to keep granning as long as they could and keep harking about "cheated but not defeated."
Replies sorted oldest to newest
So what's your prediction about the PPP filing a petition in the courts to challenge the election results?
I say they are not going to. They cannot afford to lose in court. They intend to keep granning as long as they could and keep harking about "cheated but not defeated."
i tend to agree
it may be all about 'bargaining' . . .
The PPP is trying to stall the government so that they can hide the money they stole. Some were planning to flee but their US passport puts them in a spot. A couple are wanted in the US for questioning.
The PPP is in no position to win an elections petition. That is why they are delaying.
Read all the PPP statements carefully.
It is all wild accusation with ZERO concrete evidence.
PUT UP or SHUT UP - Jagdeo.
An article 163 petition only made sense in the context of a preliminary injunction to prevent GECOM from declaring the election while the PPP tried to comb through the ballot boxes to come up with a couple thousand votes by hook or crook.
Post-swearing in, this petition in a place like Guyana isn't even worth toilet paper.
Abbe farma AG dropped the ball pon dis wan.
Post-swearing in, this petition in a place like Guyana isn't even worth toilet paper.
Abbe farma AG dropped the ball pon dis wan.
Why, because the Justice system is unfair or is it because the burden of proof on the PPP will be much greater?
Not sure what the AG could have done.
Access to this requires a premium membership.