Skip to main content

@Django posted:

Did Cathy said that ?  are you aware of her past Employment ?

Notice the "twin" said on another forum ,there are defense here.

She actually did. When she didn't want to take responsibility for agreeing with threatening comments by one of her Facebook pal against the sitting government. Why you think she was dragged before the ERC?

There is indeed lots of defense here for the very incompetent and corrupted actions of the Coalition folks.

Now they saying Cathy also approved 6M payment to her own company.

Wanna bet she will now say that someone hacked her signature?

This woman is as diabolical as they come.

@Ilum posted:

She actually did.

When she didn't want to take responsibility for agreeing with threatening comments by one of her Facebook pal against the sitting government. Why you think she was dragged before the ERC?

There is indeed lots of defense here for the very incompetent and corrupted actions of the Coalition folks.

Now they saying Cathy also approved 6M payment to her own company.

Wanna bet she will now say that someone hacked her signature?

This woman is as diabolical as they come.

When ??

Since when seeking verification of facts of the issues is defending ?

@Django posted:

Damn ,sounds like dictatorship .

Bai, yuh have a strange way of thinking of things. What is dictatorial in suggesting that once you have determine that something is factual you don't waste any more time seeking to verify it. How would you have determine that it was factual if you hadn't already verified it? That is what trying to defend the diabolical actions of the Coalition will do. It gives one serious whiplash.

@Ilum posted:

Bai, yuh have a strange way of thinking of things.

What is dictatorial in suggesting that once you have determine that something is factual you don't waste any more time seeking to verify it.

How would you have determine that it was factual if you hadn't already verified it?

That is what trying to defend the diabolical actions of the Coalition will do. It gives one serious whiplash.

Read the sentences in bold ,that's the way the world runs ,too many holes in the views.

Last edited by Django
@Ilum posted:

Here is Cathy Hughes losing her laptop that she left in her briefcase on her desk. Then she returned and said it was missing. She looked all over especially around the area where she lost it. Then some hours later, the laptop resurfaced around the same place where she had earlier lost it. How did she not see who placed it on her chair when it was placed there? For someone who had just lost their property she certainly didn't care enough to keep her eyes on where it went missing for had she done so she would have seen who returned it. She is indeed very careless just like she did when she took her eyes off the Russians causing them to escape.

Pure unadulterated, meandering bullshit rife with "fill ins" in order to mek up he "facts". Nowhere in the account is any of this detailed. The woman reported the laptop lost to the Speaker and a search was commissioned. Only an idiot like you would report the laptop lost, hide it in plain sight, and wander over to the speaker to report it stolen, knowing that it is right there.

The rest of your infantile questions and speculations don't merit a response.

@Iguana posted:

Pure unadulterated, meandering bullshit rife with "fill ins" in order to mek up he "facts". Nowhere in the account is any of this detailed. The woman reported the laptop lost to the Speaker and a search was commissioned. Only an idiot like you would report the laptop lost, hide it in plain sight, and wander over to the speaker to report it stolen, knowing that it is right there.

The rest of your infantile questions and speculations don't merit a response.

And yet!

@kp posted:

Cain seh you were crawling on all four while you were SUSPENDED. Mitwah has the record for the most suspension.

'twas me who said that Kaka Poo. And it's true. Sally said because of his age and injuries that's how he goes up the steps. You are on all fours for an entirely different reason!