Skip to main content

Mitwah posted:
ksazma posted:
 

He didn't become tainted because the Coalition was declared the winner. He became tainted because he stubbornly refused to grant a valid recount request. People don't/shouldn't get passes for their bad actions just because they also have good actions.

That's not entirely true.

 

Entirely or not is a judgement call. I am glad that you can acknowledged that he did not grant a valid request.

FM
ksazma posted:
Mitwah posted:
ksazma posted:
 

He didn't become tainted because the Coalition was declared the winner. He became tainted because he stubbornly refused to grant a valid recount request. People don't/shouldn't get passes for their bad actions just because they also have good actions.

That's not entirely true.

 

Entirely or not is a judgement call. I am glad that you can acknowledged that he did not grant a valid request.

That was his prerogative. In 2011 the PPP forgot how they got Boodhoo to delay the recount until the time was expired for a substantial seat be given to the AFC. The Rat coveted that seat; he and the Duck preferred confrontation rather than compromise. Poor losers! Please save me the crocodile tears. 

Mitwah
Mitwah posted:
ksazma posted:
Mitwah posted:
ksazma posted:
 

He didn't become tainted because the Coalition was declared the winner. He became tainted because he stubbornly refused to grant a valid recount request. People don't/shouldn't get passes for their bad actions just because they also have good actions.

That's not entirely true. 

Entirely or not is a judgement call. I am glad that you can acknowledged that he did not grant a valid request.

That was his prerogative. 

And that is how his prerogative ended up tainting the Coalition government's validity.

FM
kp posted:

I see the PNC paid drum beaters are showing their real ignorance, stay quiet, refuse to answer and diversion , that's the #2 principle of the Congress House Doctrine. In any democratic country a recount must be done when the votes are close otherwise the result is tarnished. The ABC countries sent Carter to secure a regime change and they succeeded.

Why would your ABC countries allow the Rat to win come 2020?

Mitwah
ksazma posted:
Mitwah posted:
ksazma posted:
Mitwah posted:
ksazma posted:
 

He didn't become tainted because the Coalition was declared the winner. He became tainted because he stubbornly refused to grant a valid recount request. People don't/shouldn't get passes for their bad actions just because they also have good actions.

That's not entirely true. 

Entirely or not is a judgement call. I am glad that you can acknowledged that he did not grant a valid request.

That was his prerogative. 

And that is how his prerogative ended up tainting the Coalition government's validity.

They claimed fake SOPS and came up empty handed recount after recounts. The Chairman was right to call a halt to their speculations. 

There was no more Foo-Foo in the mortar. 

Mitwah
Mitwah posted:
kp posted:

I see the PNC paid drum beaters are showing their real ignorance, stay quiet, refuse to answer and diversion , that's the #2 principle of the Congress House Doctrine. In any democratic country a recount must be done when the votes are close otherwise the result is tarnished. The ABC countries sent Carter to secure a regime change and they succeeded.

Why would your ABC countries allow the Rat to win come 2020?

It will not happen we have pride and liberated.  Guyana still under colonial rule under Granger leadership he is willing to do anything to please the ABC countries,they have him there and are pulling the strings.

K

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×