None of the PNC positions are winnable in a court of law, and they know this.  However, that’s not their goal.  Their goal is to stretch this out into 2020 and have their machinery in place to snag a couple seats by the crook!  This plan has always been there but Charandass rass them up.

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

VishMahabir posted:

 

[1] Your real problem is its an “Anand-Persaud” thing (I am guessing he is the editor)...your anti-Indo petticoat showing...

 

[2] You are the same person defending that racist Phillips...

re [1] i am not responsible for your malignant conjectural fantasies that you reify like antiman because you have nothing intelligent in response . . . i suspect they are Freudian

re [2] snarling outright LIES are not helping your case

good luck with the GNI PPP project [trying haaard] to paint me (Ronan) as some sort of anti-Indo "racist"

uh huh

You are something else...thin skinned and prickly yet you are wont to hurl  insults of your own  peculiar venal strain in every post!

And  I ask, what is your hang up with homosexuals and why is it you presume that it is only homosexuals who oppose you? Don't you think that is "malignant  conjectural fantasies" if not abject ignorant and utter useless trolling?

Why is the gentleman lying if he opposes your facts? Are you Gabriel and can only speak eternal verities? You should not engage in discussions if that is your view. 

i have never, ever, pointed to "homosexuals" in my posts; neither have i used the term "fag.ot" as you imputed in trying out a nasty, coward smear on the sly a week or so ago elsewhere on this board

good luck in trying to twist an 'argument' you cannot win into a risible moral-high-ground-stretch deconstructing [my use of] the term "antiman" on GNI

bottom line . . . you, like he, are a DISHONEST scamp husslin to reify a FEEBLE LIE, to wit, that i posted on GNI in support of some racist something that Eric Phillips said

i am running y'all foul diarrheal bucktas up a flagpole as my way of EXPOSING y'all 2 weak 'intellects' to public ridicule

btw, what is it about my use of "malignant conjectural fantasies" that offends you so?

is my construction too much for you or too subtle?

lol

Baseman posted:

None of the PNC positions are winnable in a court of law, and they know this.  However, that’s not their goal.  Their goal is to stretch this out into 2020 and have their machinery in place to snag a couple seats by the crook!  This plan has always been there but Charandass rass them up.

the "PNC" goal was always to have elections with a CLEAN list

somehow THAT is garlic to alyuh tiefman vampires

your post is weak cover to distract from the PPP push for elections with the FRAUD list

that's what 'Charrandas' was all about

remember Bharrat saying he didn't care about letter-of-the-law 90 days as long as elections were held by April 30 . . . hmmmm?

ronan posted:

Baseman posted:

None of the PNC positions are winnable in a court of law, and they know this.  However, that’s not their goal.  Their goal is to stretch this out into 2020 and have their machinery in place to snag a couple seats by the crook!  This plan has always been there but Charandass rass them up.

the "PNC" goal was always to have elections with a CLEAN list

 

The biggest joke for a Sunday marning Mr Thomas 

Dave posted:

The biggest joke for a Sunday marning Mr Thomas 

which "Thomas" is that bai . . . hmmm?

i'd like to explore . . .

lol

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

VishMahabir posted:

 

[1] Your real problem is its an “Anand-Persaud” thing (I am guessing he is the editor)...your anti-Indo petticoat showing...

 

[2] You are the same person defending that racist Phillips...

re [1] i am not responsible for your malignant conjectural fantasies that you reify like antiman because you have nothing intelligent in response . . . i suspect they are Freudian

re [2] snarling outright LIES are not helping your case

good luck with the GNI PPP project [trying haaard] to paint me (Ronan) as some sort of anti-Indo "racist"

uh huh

You are something else...thin skinned and prickly yet you are wont to hurl  insults of your own  peculiar venal strain in every post!

And  I ask, what is your hang up with homosexuals and why is it you presume that it is only homosexuals who oppose you? Don't you think that is "malignant  conjectural fantasies" if not abject ignorant and utter useless trolling?

Why is the gentleman lying if he opposes your facts? Are you Gabriel and can only speak eternal verities? You should not engage in discussions if that is your view. 

i have never, ever, pointed to "homosexuals" in my posts; neither have i used the term "fag.ot" as you imputed in trying out a nasty, coward smear on the sly a week or so ago elsewhere on this board

good luck in trying to twist an 'argument' you cannot win into a risible moral-high-ground-stretch deconstructing [my use of] the term "antiman" on GNI

bottom line . . . you, like he, are a DISHONEST scamp husslin to reify a FEEBLE LIE, to wit, that i posted on GNI in support of some racist something that Eric Phillips said

i am running y'all foul diarrheal bucktas up a flagpole as my way of EXPOSING y'all 2 weak 'intellects' to public ridicule

btw, what is it about my use of "malignant conjectural fantasies" that offends you so?

is my construction too much for you or too subtle?

lol

I am Guyanese and anti man means homosexual in our creoles so why is your usage of the word always appeals to the pejorative?

Of course you will retreat to your usual ready refuge that someone is telling lies on you! What a narcissistic troll!

You are running afoul in your own imagination and your presumption of monumental intellect is just that; the presumption of a boorish nit. 

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

VishMahabir posted:

 

[1] Your real problem is its an “Anand-Persaud” thing (I am guessing he is the editor)...your anti-Indo petticoat showing...

 

[2] You are the same person defending that racist Phillips...

re [1] i am not responsible for your malignant conjectural fantasies that you reify like antiman because you have nothing intelligent in response . . . i suspect they are Freudian

re [2] snarling outright LIES are not helping your case

good luck with the GNI PPP project [trying haaard] to paint me (Ronan) as some sort of anti-Indo "racist"

uh huh

You are something else...thin skinned and prickly yet you are wont to hurl  insults of your own  peculiar venal strain in every post!

And  I ask, what is your hang up with homosexuals and why is it you presume that it is only homosexuals who oppose you? Don't you think that is "malignant  conjectural fantasies" if not abject ignorant and utter useless trolling?

Why is the gentleman lying if he opposes your facts? Are you Gabriel and can only speak eternal verities? You should not engage in discussions if that is your view. 

i have never, ever, pointed to "homosexuals" in my posts; neither have i used the term "fag.ot" as you imputed in trying out a nasty, coward smear on the sly a week or so ago elsewhere on this board

good luck in trying to twist an 'argument' you cannot win into a risible moral-high-ground-stretch deconstructing [my use of] the term "antiman" on GNI

bottom line . . . you, like he, are a DISHONEST scamp husslin to reify a FEEBLE LIE, to wit, that i posted on GNI in support of some racist something that Eric Phillips said

i am running y'all foul diarrheal bucktas up a flagpole as my way of EXPOSING y'all 2 weak 'intellects' to public ridicule

btw, what is it about my use of "malignant conjectural fantasies" that offends you so?

is my construction too much for you or too subtle?

lol

I am Guyanese and anti man means homosexual in our creoles so why is your usage of the word always appeals to the pejorative?

Of course you will retreat to your usual ready refuge that someone is telling lies on you! What a narcissistic troll!

You are running afoul in your own imagination and your presumption of monumental intellect is just that; the presumption of a boorish nit.

antiman[ish] behavior in EVERY context i have used it to ridicule on GNI points to [adolescent] GIRL behavior by grown-ass men, most with MACHO pretensions

that's the "pejorative"

yours is a weak effort at pivot

how many ways can i say "feeble"

smfh

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

that Special Master should be chosen from a list of eminent persons outside the Commonwealth . . . preferably from Norway

the two Guyana parties should be presented with a list where they can mount objections to particular nominees . . . somewhat similar to the sanctified GECOM formula

we are in extra-constitutional waters now

let's see then who is acting in "good faith"

You and trump has this hots for Norway! Well, I agree a special master would serve to end the coming delays from both sides over dubious objections designed to meet political ends. 

I do not agree we are in extra constitutional waters. The dorp dead day for the NCV will be when the CCJ hands down their official ruling the clock to 90 days begins then.  The granger regime has acted as if no NCV was in force up to now. They always asserted they are the governing body until the NCV is declared accepted by the CCJ

Faith is a terrible thing to rely on in Guyana's political waters. And good is not an adjective I would attach to either party. 

it's not for you to agree

constitutionally, elections cannot be held if there is no GECOM chair

Nor was it for you to propose a special master or declare we are in extra constitutional waters. Talking through your ass?

i showed why "we are in extra-constitutional waters"

you simply brayed

that's the difference between us two

judge again which one of us is "talking through [the] ass"

arite?

ronan posted:

antiman[ish] behavior in EVERY context i have used it to ridicule on GNI points to [adolescent] GIRL behavior by grown-ass men, most with MACHO pretensions

that's the "pejorative"

yours is a weak effort at pivot

how many ways can i say "feeble"

smfh

You are in a peculiar mental fly trap here! You are so obscenely hung up on your homophobia that glibly frame as stupid little girls! Tell that to Plato, Leonardo, Turin, Richard Wright etc.

I do not have to pretend on manly things. I have a second degree black belt in kyokushinkai karate, I have 20 years of Wing Chun under my belt, used to free climb, raced XC mountain bikes ( still ride), snowboard etc. But that is what I do for fun and not to prove manliness. Raising three kids and seeing them through college that is manliness. This deriding of manhood is just to get yourself out of a rabid homophobia swampland

ronan posted:

i showed why "we are in extra-constitutional waters"

you simply brayed

that's the difference between us two

judge again which one of us is "talking through [the] ass"

arite?

You made a declaration. You provided no substance as to why you think it is so. To the contrary, I told you why we are in no crisis. The day the judge rule the NCV is valid is day one of the end of the Granger government.Elections in 90 days unless there is the issue of incompetent people telling they need 9 months to canvass some 150k households!

Stormborn posted:

I do not have to pretend on manly things. I have a second degree black belt in kyokushinkai karate, I have 20 years of Wing Chun under my belt, used to free climb, raced XC mountain bikes ( still ride), snowboard etc. But that is what I do for fun and not to prove manliness. Raising three kids and seeing them through college that is manliness.

huh?

banna, go see a shrink . . . you really have issues

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

i showed why "we are in extra-constitutional waters"

you simply brayed

that's the difference between us two

judge again which one of us is "talking through [the] ass"

arite?

You made a declaration. You provided no substance as to why you think it is so.

i made much, much more than a "declaration" regarding extra-constitutionality

i said the following:

"constitutionally, elections cannot be held if there is no GECOM chair"

call a friend if you still scratching your head pan dat wan

arite?

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

I do not have to pretend on manly things. I have a second degree black belt in kyokushinkai karate, I have 20 years of Wing Chun under my belt, used to free climb, raced XC mountain bikes ( still ride), snowboard etc. But that is what I do for fun and not to prove manliness. Raising three kids and seeing them through college that is manliness.

huh?

banna, go see a shrink . . . you really have issues

Truth bitch slapped you ass!  

BTW I can also rock a mean lead guitar!!!

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

i showed why "we are in extra-constitutional waters"

you simply brayed

that's the difference between us two

judge again which one of us is "talking through [the] ass"

arite?

You made a declaration. You provided no substance as to why you think it is so.

i made much, much more than a "declaration" regarding extra-constitutionality

i said the following:

"constitutionally, elections cannot be held if there is no GECOM chair"

call a friend if you still scratching your head pan dat wan

arite?

And for whom is it a problem to select a GECOM chair?   As I stated, there is no learning curve here. 

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

i showed why "we are in extra-constitutional waters"

you simply brayed

that's the difference between us two

judge again which one of us is "talking through [the] ass"

arite?

You made a declaration. You provided no substance as to why you think it is so.

i made much, much more than a "declaration" regarding extra-constitutionality

i said the following:

"constitutionally, elections cannot be held if there is no GECOM chair"

call a friend if you still scratching your head pan dat wan

arite?

And for whom is it a problem to select a GECOM chair?   As I stated, there is no learning curve here. 

actually, you stated (a LIE) that i simply made a "declaration" on extra-constitutionality

now you trying to backfill with incoherence about whose "problem" it is and some stupidness about "learning curve"

smh

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

i showed why "we are in extra-constitutional waters"

you simply brayed

that's the difference between us two

judge again which one of us is "talking through [the] ass"

arite?

You made a declaration. You provided no substance as to why you think it is so.

i made much, much more than a "declaration" regarding extra-constitutionality

i said the following:

"constitutionally, elections cannot be held if there is no GECOM chair"

call a friend if you still scratching your head pan dat wan

arite?

And for whom is it a problem to select a GECOM chair?   As I stated, there is no learning curve here. 

actually, you stated (a LIE) that i simply made a "declaration" on extra-constitutionality

now you trying to backfill with incoherence about whose "problem" it is and some stupidness about "learning curve"

smh

The statement occurred in the OP. Show us where you proved that proposition with the post. You are a piddling twit, with air in the head bigger than Boyles law can manage.

I said it was easy to fill the position with agreeable parties overseeing the process.  I mentioned "learning curve" because once filled with the appropriate person their is no special skill requirement  beyond logistical and administrative skills  

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

i showed why "we are in extra-constitutional waters"

you simply brayed

that's the difference between us two

judge again which one of us is "talking through [the] ass"

arite?

You made a declaration. You provided no substance as to why you think it is so.

i made much, much more than a "declaration" regarding extra-constitutionality

i said the following:

"constitutionally, elections cannot be held if there is no GECOM chair"

call a friend if you still scratching your head pan dat wan

arite?

And for whom is it a problem to select a GECOM chair?   As I stated, there is no learning curve here. 

actually, you stated (a LIE) that i simply made a "declaration" on extra-constitutionality

now you trying to backfill with incoherence about whose "problem" it is and some stupidness about "learning curve"

smh

The statement occurred in the OP. Show us where you proved that proposition with the post. You are a piddling twit, with air in the head bigger than Boyles law can manage.

I said it was easy to fill the position with agreeable parties overseeing the process.  I mentioned "learning curve" because once filled with the appropriate person their is no special skill requirement  beyond logistical and administrative skills  

Q.E.D.

nothing else required from me here

ronan posted:

Q.E.D.

nothing else required from me here

vacuous to begin with

Dave posted:

ronan posted:

Baseman posted:

None of the PNC positions are winnable in a court of law, and they know this.  However, that’s not their goal.  Their goal is to stretch this out into 2020 and have their machinery in place to snag a couple seats by the crook!  This plan has always been there but Charandass rass them up.

the "PNC" goal was always to have elections with a CLEAN list

 

The biggest joke for a Sunday marning Mr Thomas 

HEHEHEHE HAHAHAHA Mental Slaves conditioned at sophia CANNOT change!!

Dave posted:

ronan posted:

Baseman posted:

None of the PNC positions are winnable in a court of law, and they know this.  However, that’s not their goal.  Their goal is to stretch this out into 2020 and have their machinery in place to snag a couple seats by the crook!  This plan has always been there but Charandass rass them up.

the "PNC" goal was always to have elections with a CLEAN list

 

The biggest joke for a Sunday marning Mr Thomas 

And who says Ronan the warrior don’t have a sense of humor!!

Baseman posted:

Dave posted:

ronan posted:

Baseman posted:

None of the PNC positions are winnable in a court of law, and they know this.  However, that’s not their goal.  Their goal is to stretch this out into 2020 and have their machinery in place to snag a couple seats by the crook!  This plan has always been there but Charandass rass them up.

the "PNC" goal was always to have elections with a CLEAN list

 

The biggest joke for a Sunday marning Mr Thomas 

And who says Ronan the warrior don’t have a sense of humor!!

who is “Mr Thomas” bai?

i need a good laff on this important day