Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

skeldon_man posted:
ksazma posted:

@Django Bai Django, what is your objective of posters taking this test?

We are already set in our ways. What will test tell us? I don't have the patience to go through all that nonsense. I just took a glimpse of one item.

These nonsense are forms of indoctrinations. They are modern day attempts to influence peoples' thoughts and actions. The trouble is the pontificators are usually worse than the subjects. Take for instance Warren's attempted rebuke of Buttigieg about donors. He responded to her perfectly about the problem of people issuing purity tests they themselves cannot pass.

These tests are meaningless to GNI posters right now. The only thing that matters is Granger's yearlong thumbing his nose at the laws and constitution and obstinacy regarding elections within 90 days of the successful passage of a NCV. That is the test that the Granger illegal cabal is failing and those who condone it is equally as bad.

FM
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

@Django Bai Django, what is your objective of posters taking this test?

Me thinks it's good how we see things.

I don't think so bai. We are all accomplished individuals in our own right so if we still need to learn about ourselves, we have a huge problem. I see these as indoctrination exercises and I even discourage my young children from any of these kinds of exercises. There are a lot of evil people in the world whose only objective is to rule over others. I constantly warn my young kids of avoiding those kinds of people.

Question. How much credence do you give to shrinks?

FM
Django posted:
skeldon_man posted:
ksazma posted:

@Django Bai Django, what is your objective of posters taking this test?

We are already set in our ways. What will test tell us? I don't have the patience to go through all that nonsense. I just took a glimpse of one item.

What you saying , we are stuck and can't change ?

I think we change every day as we process things more clearly. I refuse to change because someone tells me that there is some deficiency in my actions because almost every time someone seeks to tell another about some deficiency they are worse. Beware of wolves in sheep clothing.

FM
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

@Django Bai Django, what is your objective of posters taking this test?

Me thinks it's good how we see things.

I don't think so bai. We are all accomplished individuals in our own right so if we still need to learn about ourselves, we have a huge problem. I see these as indoctrination exercises and I even discourage my young children from any of these kinds of exercises.

There are a lot of evil people in the world whose only objective is to rule over others.I constantly warn my young kids of avoiding those kinds of people.

Question. How much credence do you give to shrinks?

Quite interesting , i allow my children to decide who are evil ,i will not pontificate , will have discussions what to look for about people. They have their own life to live.

Django
Last edited by Django
ksazma posted:
skeldon_man posted:
ksazma posted:

@Django Bai Django, what is your objective of posters taking this test?

We are already set in our ways. What will test tell us? I don't have the patience to go through all that nonsense. I just took a glimpse of one item.

These nonsense are forms of indoctrinations. They are modern day attempts to influence peoples' thoughts and actions. The trouble is the pontificators are usually worse than the subjects. Take for instance Warren's attempted rebuke of Buttigieg about donors. He responded to her perfectly about the problem of people issuing purity tests they themselves cannot pass.

These tests are meaningless to GNI posters right now. The only thing that matters is Granger's yearlong thumbing his nose at the laws and constitution and obstinacy regarding elections within 90 days of the successful passage of a NCV. That is the test that the Granger illegal cabal is failing and those who condone it is equally as bad.

Well said Kaz... 
Django should personally take the test to Congress Place and make sure them cabal take it, they may then believe 33 is greater than 32... since Djanjo so believe in the test... If Djanjo biases opinion doesn’t change now, then the test didn’t work for him. 

Personally, I stay away from those things. 

FM
Dave posted:

Django should personally take the test to Congress Place and make sure them cabal take it, they may then believe 33 is greater than 32... since Djanjo so believe in the test... If Djanjo biases opinion doesn’t change now, then the test didn’t work for him. 

Personally, I stay away from those things. 

Such a twit !!!  Always telling people to do this and do that , and called it discussions.

The test was designed by Harvard , you will stay away because the results will shocking.

Django
Last edited by Django
Django posted:
Dave posted:

Django should personally take the test to Congress Place and make sure them cabal take it, they may then believe 33 is greater than 32... since Djanjo so believe in the test... If Djanjo biases opinion doesn’t change now, then the test didn’t work for him. 

Personally, I stay away from those things. 

Such a twit !!!  The test was designed by Harvard , you will stay away because the results will shocking.

Share your results nah,  . I wanna believe the test wake you Rass up😆

FM
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:

Django should personally take the test to Congress Place and make sure them cabal take it, they may then believe 33 is greater than 32... since Djanjo so believe in the test... If Djanjo biases opinion doesn’t change now, then the test didn’t work for him. 

Personally, I stay away from those things. 

Such a twit !!!  The test was designed by Harvard , you will stay away because the results will shocking.

Share your results nah,  . I wanna believe the test wake you Rass up😆

Actually i chose one , it proves my beliefs ,i see human race. I am with the 17 % of test takers  that scored the same.

Django
Last edited by Django
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

@Django Bai Django, what is your objective of posters taking this test?

Me thinks it's good how we see things.

I don't think so bai. We are all accomplished individuals in our own right so if we still need to learn about ourselves, we have a huge problem. I see these as indoctrination exercises and I even discourage my young children from any of these kinds of exercises.

There are a lot of evil people in the world whose only objective is to rule over others.I constantly warn my young kids of avoiding those kinds of people.

Question. How much credence do you give to shrinks?

Quite interesting , i allow my children to decide who are evil ,i will not pontificate , will have discussions what to look for about people. They have their own life to live.

Bai, I am not sure what you mean above. I am my children's father and I can guarantee you that there are no one in the world who has their best interests than me and their mother. It is our responsibility to warn them about the evils of the world. In fact, to not do so is a gross dereliction of our responsibility. Our kids will have their own lives to live but me and their mother didn't just fvckad causing them to be born with no care of how they will grow. We also had the responsibility to take care of them when they were babies, provide a comfortable, safe and positive environment for them to foster in which is how they are progressing smoothly in their academic pursuits. Pontificating to ones' children is obligatory. Pontificating to others, especially when one has worse inclinations than the ones they pontificate to is unacceptable and should be vehemently rejected.

FM
Gilbakka posted:

From the moment I saw the word "Harvard" I knew the test would be out of my depth. I much prefer to do a test set by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University of India. Dem is me people.

BTW, Django, I guess you got an excellent score for that Harvard test. Sincere congratulations.

Actually here are the facts about the project.

https://www.projectimplicit.net/about.html

Project Implicit was founded in 1998 by three scientists – Tony Greenwald (University of Washington), Mahzarin Banaji (Harvard University), and Brian Nosek (University of Virginia). Project Implicit Mental Health launched in 2011, led by Bethany Teachman (University of Virginia) and Matt Nock (Harvard University). Project Implicit also provides consulting services, lectures, and workshops on implicit bias, diversity and inclusion, leadership, applying science to practice, and innovation. If you are interested in finding out more about these services, visit https://www.projectimplicit.net/organization.html.

 

Django
Django posted:
Gilbakka posted:

From the moment I saw the word "Harvard" I knew the test would be out of my depth. I much prefer to do a test set by Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University of India. Dem is me people.

BTW, Django, I guess you got an excellent score for that Harvard test. Sincere congratulations.

Actually here are the facts about the project.

https://www.projectimplicit.net/about.html

Project Implicit was founded in 1998 by three scientists – Tony Greenwald (University of Washington), Mahzarin Banaji (Harvard University), and Brian Nosek (University of Virginia). Project Implicit Mental Health launched in 2011, led by Bethany Teachman (University of Virginia) and Matt Nock (Harvard University). Project Implicit also provides consulting services, lectures, and workshops on implicit bias, diversity and inclusion, leadership, applying science to practice, and innovation. If you are interested in finding out more about these services, visit https://www.projectimplicit.net/organization.html.

 

It is money making bai with no real goal to help anyone. These indoctrination exercises are designed to make people feel lesser than the presenters of these exercises. People are expected to stand up and say, "my name is so and so and I have this problem" These people are like preachers who have all the answers but never solve any problems.

FM
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:

Django should personally take the test to Congress Place and make sure them cabal take it, they may then believe 33 is greater than 32... since Djanjo so believe in the test... If Djanjo biases opinion doesn’t change now, then the test didn’t work for him. 

Personally, I stay away from those things. 

Such a twit !!!  The test was designed by Harvard , you will stay away because the results will shocking.

Share your results nah,  . I wanna believe the test wake you Rass up😆

Actually i chose one , it proves my beliefs ,i see human race. I am with the 17 % of test takers  that scored the same.

Quiet interesting, so if you see human race as a your beliefs, then you should respect everyone’s believe.. rite 

17% meaningless ******* trying to figure out themselves .. oh boy. 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:

Django should personally take the test to Congress Place and make sure them cabal take it, they may then believe 33 is greater than 32... since Djanjo so believe in the test... If Djanjo biases opinion doesn’t change now, then the test didn’t work for him. 

Personally, I stay away from those things. 

Such a twit !!!  The test was designed by Harvard , you will stay away because the results will shocking.

Share your results nah,  . I wanna believe the test wake you Rass up😆

Actually i chose one , it proves my beliefs ,i see human race. I am with the 17 % of test takers  that scored the same.

Quiet interesting, so if you see human race as a your beliefs, then you should respect everyone’s believe.. rite 

Depends on what beliefs .

Django
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:

Django should personally take the test to Congress Place and make sure them cabal take it, they may then believe 33 is greater than 32... since Djanjo so believe in the test... If Djanjo biases opinion doesn’t change now, then the test didn’t work for him. 

Personally, I stay away from those things. 

Such a twit !!!  The test was designed by Harvard , you will stay away because the results will shocking.

Share your results nah,  . I wanna believe the test wake you Rass up😆

Actually i chose one , it proves my beliefs ,i see human race. I am with the 17 % of test takers  that scored the same.

Quiet interesting, so if you see human race as a your beliefs, then you should respect everyone’s believe.. rite 

Depends on what beliefs .

If you SEE HUMAN RACE, RESPECT EVERYONE BELIEVES.. It’s common sense. Even the stupid have a story. 

FM

I personally think too much energy is wasted on race. Everyone undermines anyone who allows them to. It is everyone’s responsibility to ensure that they do not become victimized by others. Take Harris situation for instance. She unprovokedly invoked race in the debates and when she had nothing else to contribute and was forced to drop out, she again pulled out the race card as reason for her situation. She completely overlooked all the white men who dropped out before her.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×