Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Revised voters list posted for scrutiny

January 1 2020

Source

The Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) has posted the Revised List of Electors (RLE) to allow for public scrutiny, the Department of Public Information (DPI) reported yesterday.

The list can be checked for names at https://www.gecom.org.gy/

According to GECOM Public Relations Officer Yolanda Ward, the posting of the 661, 378 names of eligible voters will be displayed over 21 days.

She said, according to DPI,  that the RLE has been posted for public scrutiny and to make corrections to information within the 21-day period. Where changes have to be made, persons should visit registration offices in their respective areas with the β€œpink slip” from January 4 to inform and update accordingly.

Citizens are urged to check to ensure that transactions done during the 2019 registration exercises are correct.

The final product, the PRO pointed out, will be the Official List of Electors.

Nomination day is scheduled for January 10, 2020. General elections are set for March 2, 2020

 
Drugb posted:

Don't lie bannas, what facts, you google shyte from wikipedia and unaccredited sources and try to pass it off as fact.

Look how you came up with fuzzy math like cribby and expect people to take you seriously.

The stench from pnc slop can must have a detrimental effect.

That's the worse ,don't quote from that.  Banna dispute the maths ,instead of chasing your tail.

I would ask you to curtail your habits ,depicted in your last sentence.

Last edited by Django
Django posted:
Drugb posted:

Those who fetch pnc slopcan make statements without providing evidence to back up said statements. A typical ignar, pretending to be an intellectual.

I back any statements with evidence , do that all the time on GNI.  That's what irks most posters ,when they try to push propaganda.

There goes the problem Django....

Propaganda is a broad term, and we can interpret it’s intend when it is used to promote ones personal belief, like how you said, you are neutral and will identify the corrupt. 

But you are YET to call out the corrupt and corruption in APNU/ AFC in the same manner as you do with PPP. If you don’t see this as a problem, then we have problems in the future. 

Dave posted:
Django posted:
Drugb posted:

Those who fetch pnc slopcan make statements without providing evidence to back up said statements. A typical ignar, pretending to be an intellectual.

I back any statements with evidence , do that all the time on GNI.  That's what irks most posters ,when they try to push propaganda.

There goes the problem Django....

Propaganda is a broad term, and we can interpret it’s intend when it is used to promote ones personal belief, like how you said, you are neutral and will identify the corrupt. 


But you are YET to call out the corrupt and corruption in APNU/ AFC in the same manner as you do with PPP. If you don’t see this as a problem, then we have problems in the future. 

Banna are you sure , i haven't call out corruption by APNU/AFC ? there are two that stands out ,both i have condemn.

I would re-state my beliefs regarding Guyana , which i have done before , no government should be anchored for long periods ,there should be periods of rotating government, the voters should make this happen.

Any way take a look at the meaning of propaganda ,it differs from neutral folks beliefs.

Last edited by Django

I just saw this. What kind of gin kaak bring ramgoat story hey?

FB posting from Anil Nandlall.

I thought that when the Chairperson of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM), approximately two weeks ago, casted her vote in favour of verifying the 16,863 β€œpossible new registrants” emerging from the truncated house-to-house registration exercise, GECOM had accepted that unverified names cannot legally eventuate unto the Revised List of Electors (RLE).

I, therefore, felt fortified when GECOM embarked upon a verification exercise in respect of these 16,863 β€œpossible new registrants”, scrutinized by agents of the political parties.

This verification exercise resulted in 6,535 persons on that list of 16,863 not being verified. I understand this to mean that these persons were not found by the verifiers. Significantly, only 118 of this list of 16,863 were not visited.

After going through with this entire ordeal, GECOM still ends up placing all the 16,863 on the RLE, including 6,417, which GECOM itself has confirmed they could not find and the 118 who were not even visited.

Now, GECOM is requesting the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) to provide evidence to establish that the 6,535 persons do not exist, even though it is GECOM that executed the verification exercise and it is GECOM that disclosed that they were unable to verify the existence or whereabouts of these very persons.

Maybe, I am losing it, but does this make sense to anyone?

Coincidentally, 6,535 votes will constitute over one seat, the difference between APNU & the PPP at the 2015 elections.

Django posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Coincidentally, 6,535 votes will constitute over one seat, the difference between APNU & the PPP at the 2015 elections.

The winner will have more than one seat difference ,in the coming elections. I have been looking at recent elections results in Regions 1,7,8,9,10 and came to the conclusion.

Why include the non existent people in the list?

skeldon_man posted:
Django posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Coincidentally, 6,535 votes will constitute over one seat, the difference between APNU & the PPP at the 2015 elections.

The winner will have more than one seat difference ,in the coming elections. I have been looking at recent elections results in Regions 1,7,8,9,10 and came to the conclusion.

Why include the non existent people in the list?

That's why HTH registration was needed to verify the voters are existing. Periodically it have to be done.

Last edited by Django
Django posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Would GECOM chair allow the jumbie names to be on the voters' list? What will happen to the 6000 plus names?

They can't vote .

It can happen Django, here is how. 
Take for example Buxton.. opposition polling agent can be intimidated by APNU / AFC supporters, they can leave for their safety... so who is there to object to multiple voting. 

Mr X will vote for the jumbie and not dipping his finger in the ink , he then return to vote for himself. There is also the possibility of stuffing the box with the jumbie votes. 

It happened in 2015 and GECOM refused to address same when the ballot papers supply by Canada did not match some that was in the boxes. 

We are dealing with PNC that rigged election for 28 years, and ONLY the intervention of the ABC country that saw a change. 
These same bastard rule of a free election in 2015 and ignored the international law that required a recount if the vote are 2% and less . 

They sat silent including CARICOM where the constitution is violated and court orders are ignored.  

Django posted:
skeldon_man posted:
Django posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Coincidentally, 6,535 votes will constitute over one seat, the difference between APNU & the PPP at the 2015 elections.

The winner will have more than one seat difference ,in the coming elections. I have been looking at recent elections results in Regions 1,7,8,9,10 and came to the conclusion.

Why include the non existent people in the list?

That's why HTH registration was needed to verify the voters are existing. Periodically it have to be done.

Carter suggested a effective way how it can be done. Why wasn’t it implemented. 

Django posted:
skeldon_man posted:

Would GECOM chair allow the jumbie names to be on the voters' list? What will happen to the 6000 plus names?

They can't vote .

If they can’t vote why were you worried about all the names of alleged non existent people on the list used for the 2015 elections?