Skip to main content

FM
Former Member
http://www.demerarawaves.com/i...a-tv-suspension.html


Reporters Without Borders slams Sharma TV suspension
Written by Demerara Waves
Tuesday, 04 October 2011 11:17

International press freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders has condemned President Bharrat Jagdeo's suspension of CNS TV6 ahead of the upcoming elections calling it an appalling move.

"The presidential order is all the more reprehensible for forcing the station off the air during the run-up to regional and general elections that must be held by 28 December," the group said in a release Tuesday.

It added that the suspension is "both discriminatory and absurd."

"How can the president's personal view of a comment made on the air be grounds for reducing CNS Channel Six to silence? But this appalling measure is all the more inopportune for coming during an election period.

The fact that the station is owned by Chandra Narine Sharma, the leader of the opposition Justice for All Party, is a further reason for seeing it as an attack on pluralism and democratic debate," the France-based NGO declared.

It noted that the official reason for the suspension was opposition parliamentarian Anthony Vieira's on-the-air criticism of Bishop Juan Edghill for which the former PNCR1-G MP and Sharma have been sued by Edghill.

"There is nothing to stop Bishop Edghill filing a lawsuit over the comments that were made about him but, on the other hand, nothing permits President Jagdeo to use these comments as grounds for imposing censorship," Reporters Without Borders said.

Sharma had been suspended twice before for broadcast breaches, the first time for one month and the second time for four months. This time the television operator, whose station went off air at 6 PM Monday, said he would be laying off his 30 workers.

Reporters Without Borders also noted Jagdeo's testy relationship with certain sections of the media and drew attention to the July passage of the Broadcasting Bill which contains elements that have raised eye brows.

"It provides for a National Broadcasting Authority with a board of seven persons all named by the president. Also clause 32 of the new law says that all programmes must be "fair and balanced."

Trying to use legislation to impose criteria about 'good' programme content and news coverage is unfortunately the surest way to obstruct the work of the media," Reporters Without Borders concluded.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Reporters Without Borders?
Come on, guys. You know how this thing works.
A "reporter" within Guyana's borders drafted that statement or most of it and sent it to Reporters Without Borders for signature and endorsement.
Nothing to be alarmed about.
Reporters Without Borders should sponsor C.N. Sharma to attend a journalism college.
B
quote:
Originally posted by Bookman:
Reporters Without Borders?
Come on, guys. You know how this thing works.
A "reporter" within Guyana's borders drafted that statement or most of it and sent it to Reporters Without Borders for signature and endorsement.
Nothing to be alarmed about.
Reporters Without Borders should sponsor C.N. Sharma to attend a journalism college.


So the Reporters Without Borders signed it blind-folded, right ?

How are draft protest formulated, signed and distributed ?

Someone should send Jagdeo to a political college to understand how to change a country's constitution, they promised to do for more than 19 years.
Tola
quote:
Originally posted by Demerara_Guy:
Changes to fundamental clauses in the Guyana constitution requires the support of, at least, 66% of the members of parliament.


The PPP has proven that they were able to get most things passed in parliament, why not the constitution ?

They were also able to ignore things that benefit their corrupt manner of governance.
Tola
quote:
Originally posted by Tola:
quote:
Originally posted by Demerara_Guy:

Changes to fundamental clauses in the Guyana constitution requires the support of, at least, 66% of the members of parliament.


The PPP has proven that they were able to get most things passed in parliament, why not the constitution ?

They were also able to ignore things that benefit their corrupt manner of governance.


Again, quite simple ..

The Constitution requires the support of at least 66% of the members of parliament.

Questions: .. When were the opposition members prepared to concientiously work to make that specific change to the constitution?
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Demerara_Guy:
quote:
Originally posted by Tola:
quote:
Originally posted by Demerara_Guy:

Changes to fundamental clauses in the Guyana constitution requires the support of, at least, 66% of the members of parliament.


The PPP has proven that they were able to get most things passed in parliament, why not the constitution ?

They were also able to ignore things that benefit their corrupt manner of governance.


Again, quite simple ..

The Constitution requires the support of at least 66% of the members of parliament.

Questions: .. When were the opposition members prepared to concientiously work to make that specific change to the constitution?


Question : Was it tabled, were they asked ?
Tola
quote:
Originally posted by Demerara_Guy:
The opportunity existed, but the opposition members did not proceed to make the needed specific amendents to the constitution.


The PPP extended the parliament to continue their last minute ramming of bills down the throat of Guyanese because they know their time is coming to an abrubt end
J
quote:
Originally posted by Tola:
quote:
Originally posted by Demerara_Guy:

The opportunity existed, but the opposition members did not proceed to make the needed specific amendents to the constitution.


Question : Is the opposition the Government of Guyana ?


Again, quite simple ..

It requires, at least, 66% of the parliamentarians to make the change.

Question: .. When has the opposition members made the effort to make the number 66% or more?
FM
quote:
Originally posted by Demerara_Guy:
quote:
Originally posted by Tola:
quote:
Originally posted by Demerara_Guy:

The opportunity existed, but the opposition members did not proceed to make the needed specific amendents to the constitution.


Question : Is the opposition the Government of Guyana ?


Again, quite simple ..

It requires, at least, 66% of the parliamentarians to make the change.

Question: .. When has the opposition members made the effort to make the number 66% or more?


Question : Why should the opposition do work designated to the government ?
Tola

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×