i dearly hope that Bharrat Jagdeo does not again force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list if we have to revisit the nomination of a Chair before 2020
Patto creakin juss a lil bit of late
i dearly hope that Bharrat Jagdeo does not again force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list if we have to revisit the nomination of a Chair before 2020
Patto creakin juss a lil bit of late
Replies sorted oldest to newest
"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Jagdoe give de President wan provocation list foh true. Granger tell de man give me SIX choice. Jagdoe mek sure he sneak in 2 or 3 known PPP backahs in each submission. Granger decide foh not combine all de liss. De Presi get he own ole bai. Hey hey hey...Ole and Proppa...hey hey hey...
VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
Little or no faith in a court with a history of unfairness and corruption. Let it go to the CCJ
Billy Ram Balgobin posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
Little or no faith in a court with a history of unfairness and corruption. Let it go to the CCJ
Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.
Billy Ram Balgobin posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
Little or no faith in a court with a history of unfairness and corruption. Let it go to the CCJ
You must respect the court.
Mars posted:Billy Ram Balgobin posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
Little or no faith in a court with a history of unfairness and corruption. Let it go to the CCJ
Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.
These fellas are so biased, don't need magnifying glasses to see such.The courts became more corrupted under the PPP.The Courts are currently performing what they are mandated to do.The PPP are loosing cases, so what do they continue to shout corruption.
Django posted:Mars posted:Billy Ram Balgobin posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
Little or no faith in a court with a history of unfairness and corruption. Let it go to the CCJ
Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.
These fellas are so biased, don't need magnifying glasses to see such.The courts became more corrupted under the PPP.The Courts are currently performing what they are mandated to do.The PPP are loosing cases, so what do they continue to shout corruption.
How come bai? Under the PPP there were still lots of PNC magistrates and judges. If they are doing now what they were mandated to do, what stopped them during the PPP years? Did we have a 90-100 % turnover rate in just over 2 years? Come on Djangy brother, not because you hate a man, you give him a basket to bail a sinking boat.
skeldon_man posted:Django posted:Mars posted:Billy Ram Balgobin posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
Little or no faith in a court with a history of unfairness and corruption. Let it go to the CCJ
Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.
These fellas are so biased, don't need magnifying glasses to see such.The courts became more corrupted under the PPP.The Courts are currently performing what they are mandated to do.The PPP are loosing cases, so what do they continue to shout corruption.
How come bai? Under the PPP there were still lots of PNC magistrates and judges. If they are doing now what they were mandated to do, what stopped them during the PPP years? Did we have a 90-100 % turnover rate in just over 2 years?
What was the percentages ?? the other question should be directed to Freedom House.
There is more fairer Justice System currently, maybe you don't prefer such.
Django posted:skeldon_man posted:Django posted:Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.
These fellas are so biased, don't need magnifying glasses to see such.The courts became more corrupted under the PPP.The Courts are currently performing what they are mandated to do.The PPP are loosing cases, so what do they continue to shout corruption.
How come bai? Under the PPP there were still lots of PNC magistrates and judges. If they are doing now what they were mandated to do, what stopped them during the PPP years? Did we have a 90-100 % turnover rate in just over 2 years?
What was the percentages ?? the other question should be directed to Freedom House.
There is more fairer Justice System currently, maybe you don't prefer such.
Bai Django, stick to the question. Forget freedom House or Congress Place. Concentrate on magistrates and judges and the turnover rate.
Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
You rite...but I still say 3 lists was a bit too much
skeldon_man posted:Django posted:skeldon_man posted:Django posted:Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.
These fellas are so biased, don't need magnifying glasses to see such.The courts became more corrupted under the PPP.The Courts are currently performing what they are mandated to do.The PPP are loosing cases, so what do they continue to shout corruption.
How come bai? Under the PPP there were still lots of PNC magistrates and judges. If they are doing now what they were mandated to do, what stopped them during the PPP years? Did we have a 90-100 % turnover rate in just over 2 years?
What was the percentages ?? the other question should be directed to Freedom House.
There is more fairer Justice System currently, maybe you don't prefer such.
Bai Django, stick to the question. Forget freedom House or Congress Place. Concentrate on magistrates and judges and the turnover rate.
Would not be surprised if Django have nightmares of Freedom House and Jagdeo and screem in his sleep.
VishMahabir posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
You rite...but I still say 3 lists was a bit too much
Are you sayin' that 3 lists were a bit too many for Uncle Granger?
skeldon_man posted:VishMahabir posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
You rite...but I still say 3 lists was a bit too much
Are you sayin' that 3 lists were a bit too many for Uncle Granger?
2 would be reasonable, I think.
VishMahabir posted:skeldon_man posted:VishMahabir posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
You rite...but I still say 3 lists was a bit too much
Are you sayin' that 3 lists were a bit too many for Uncle Granger?
2 would be reasonable, I think.
Bai, compare your statement with mine.
Dave posted:skeldon_man posted:Django posted:skeldon_man posted:Django posted:Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.
These fellas are so biased, don't need magnifying glasses to see such.The courts became more corrupted under the PPP.The Courts are currently performing what they are mandated to do.The PPP are loosing cases, so what do they continue to shout corruption.
How come bai? Under the PPP there were still lots of PNC magistrates and judges. If they are doing now what they were mandated to do, what stopped them during the PPP years? Did we have a 90-100 % turnover rate in just over 2 years?
What was the percentages ?? the other question should be directed to Freedom House.
There is more fairer Justice System currently, maybe you don't prefer such.
Bai Django, stick to the question. Forget freedom House or Congress Place. Concentrate on magistrates and judges and the turnover rate.
Would not be surprised if Django have nightmares of Freedom House and Jagdeo and screem in his sleep.
I heard that the DJ is wiring a booke titled, I dream of Jagdeo and I at freedom house.
Chapter one: Jagdeo dis and Jagdeo dat.
Django posted:Mars posted:Billy Ram Balgobin posted:Mars posted:VishMahabir posted:"force a unilateral decision on President Granger with a provocation list
You out of your mind banna...it was Granger, as I recalled, who made the unconstitutional, unilateral decision...after 3 lists were submitted.
Like you just want to instigate today, eh?
Unconstitutional? How did you arrive at that? Didn't the courts rule that Granger acted in accordance with the constitution?
Little or no faith in a court with a history of unfairness and corruption. Let it go to the CCJ
Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.
These fellas are so biased, don't need magnifying glasses to see such.The courts became more corrupted under the PPP.The Courts are currently performing what they are mandated to do.The PPP are loosing cases, so what do they continue to shout corruption.
Ha ha, you now speaking of the court decision ( where it good and dandy) ... but the other day you express concerned of chief judge Roxane George decisions.
When are you gonna be sincere to your opinions .
What the slopsters will not tell you is that LGE was just a test run to test the electorate sentiments. Now that they have a pulse on the voters, look for the PNC and their henchman to pull out all stops and activate the rigging machine. Patty is their man to see this through.
Drugb posted:LGE was just a test run to test the electorate sentiments. Now that they have a pulse on the voters, look for the PNC and their henchman to pull out all stops and activate the rigging machine. Patty is their man to see this through.
You are clueless LGE isn't test run for General Elections, propagating the nonsense from Freedom House.
Access to this requires a premium membership.