Skip to main content

seignet posted:
Prashad posted:

Modi is doing just that. "If you want a white skin wife then move to Kashmir". That is Modi's incentive to Indians. That is why keffer vex so bad. Modi destroyed his plan B. If keffer doesn't get a white Arab wife then he was planning to get a white skin wife from Kashmir. Now thanks to Modi keffer has to complete will men all over India for a white skin Kashmiri wife.

Pakistan encourages marriage of Chinese men to Hindu girls. Pakistan's way of getting rid of the Hindu citizens. Christians have the problems as well.

.. and if true, it should be condemned by all not used to justify genocide and ethnic cleansing.

AJ
.5VPrashad posted:
Stormborn posted:

Hari Singh, the hereditary leader of the region, wanted to remain independent. Pakistan invaded. He fled to India and hand over the state to India. India fought back to defend its new claims. Pakistan kept a portion after a cease fire.

They invaded again and started an ethnic cleansing. India invaded and almost destroyed Pakistan and retained the property. China has claims like any greedy neighbor wanting the place for its water. It is the reason the invaded and still hold Tibet. Maybe they should have gone with India. 

The region is a mess. India cannot give up the area. Its survival depends on holding on to it hence their hard line stance.  With it falling into the hands of Pakistan, over a 100 millions down stream will lose their water supply as it is diverted to Pakistan. India will never let Kashmir go. 

Stormborn forgot Taiwan's claim to Kashmir. Communist China has an agreement with Pakistan to get a piece of Indian Kashmir after it is giving back to Pakistan. The Pakis put some serious blows on Kashmiris living in Pakistan. There are no reporters there in Pakistan kashmir to record the lashes so everyone thinks it is all Rosie there

 

Keffer is no longer allowed in Pakistan Kashmir. So he doesn't know what is going on there.

 

Once more, you dumb-ass dishonest latrine cleaner, stop posting garbage; if you have balls, post your evidence ! Let everyone see what a shameless dishonest piece of dog-shyte you really are ! Put up or stop posting rubbish so that everyone can see that you are merely an accumulation of filth !

K
Last edited by Keffer
Prashad posted:

Keffer vex bad because now he has to compete with Moses from Madras for a white skin wife from Kashmir. Modi caused that. Keffer knows that "Opposites attract" so Tamil Moses from Madras will have the advantage with the white skin girls from Kashmir.

Who is Moses; is he your new husband Does your boyfriend know that you are spending time posting rubbish on GNI, Gadha ? If he finds out you are again making an ass of yourself, he will again deliver a good beating to your sorry ass  !

K
Last edited by Keffer

MODI MOST POPULAR: PM Narendra Modi remains the most popular leader in the country, according to the Mood of the Nation poll. 30 per cent of the respondents rated his performance as outstanding while 41 per cent rated it as good. His approval ratings as prime minister are at 71 per cent. He is also rated as the best prime minister India has had. Indira Gandhi follows in the second spot while Atal Bihari Vajpayee ranks third. Modi's predecessor, Manmohan Singh ranks seventh of the list of best Indian prime ministers.

https://www.indiatoday.in/mood...t-1580907-2019-08-14

Baseman
Keffer posted:
Prashad posted:

Keffer vex bad. Modi destroyed his Kashmir marriage plans. 

Maybe your idol Modi can find you a man; have you thought about that ? Since I will be going to India in a two or three weeks, maybe I can  ask him to help you out !

Keffer I highly doubt that you are going to India. The only India you are going to is an Indian reservation in Ontario.

Prashad
Prashad posted:
Chief posted:
Keffer posted:
Prashad posted:

I got to disagree with the chief here. Those Kashmiris are a bunch of spoilt murderous bullies who are out to earn Saudi Petrodollars by murder. Modi is too soft on them. Prashad would have gotten their murderous behinds in chains building a modern sewage system for the whole of India.

Prashad, I urge you once again to remember the old saying 'it is always so much better to keep your mouth shut and let others think you are a jackass (no insult intended to donkeys) than to open it and remove all doubt'. You insist on pretending that you know everything about everything despite the fact that you are totally incapable of differentiating your ass from your elbow ! Although you have never anywhere even remotely close to the Indian sub-continent, you insist on pretending that you are an expert who knows so much about the geopolitical situation of Indian sub-continent. The truth, however, is that your 'knowledge' is restricted solely to the cleaning of latrines for your lords and masters in the US army. You know absolutely nothing about that part of the world so you ought to use your ears and keep your yap shut as tightly as possible ! Narinder Modi is and has always been a hateful and bigoted excuse for a human being and he has displayed such behavior on scores of occasions in the past! Your 'pea-sized' brain evidently does not permit you to recall the killing of more than 230 men, women and children; all Muslims, on a train in Gujerat while Modi was the chief minister of that state ! In addition to being informed of the potential for violence prior to the arrival of the train, he was urged to request assistance and support from the central government; despite which he deliberately did NOTHING ! As a consequence of his deliberate refusal to heed the advice of his own staff and local police, close to 250 were killed ....simply because they were Muslims ! Your statement "Those Kashmiris are a bunch of spoilt murderous bullies who are out to earn Saudi Petrodollars by murder" is clearly indicative of your deep and dismal ignorance; no doubt due to inhalation of filth from the latrines that you spend your life washing daily for your masters ! I challenge you to provide even a single iota of evidence to support your statement that these people are murderers ! With our own eyes, I and my staff have witnessed the raw  brutality and barbarity that the Indian army has inflicted on these people ! I personally witnessed Indian soldiers kicking and brutalizing old men, old women and children ! UN protocols prohibit me from publishing or sharing such photographs. You can spew as much trash as you like about Modi; the United Nations has copious evidence that classifies him as a bigot and a barbarian so I strongly suggest you keep your bigotry locked up as tightly as you can in your latrine brain ! You are free to scream as loudly as you wish about the people of Kashmir; I am absolutely certain that, if you were faced with what they have to deal with from the Indian army, you will instantly you soil your drawers ! It is sad and depressing that you, a latrine cleaner who have never even 'set foot' on the Indian sub-continent and are incapable of saying two words in Hindi, Urdu or Pashto, have the temerity to call these people spoilt and murderous bullies ! My humble advice to you is that you cease and desist from participating in discussions on subjects of which you are ignorant.

 

Keffer you really lay it on Prashad.

Wait until that white Arab woman get sick and tired of hearing Keffer play his Mukesh and Rafiq records the whole day. She is going to call the police and say that keffer try to punch her in the eye and they will pick up his behind and throw him in Jail. I hope those Kashmiris break him out then.

 

Prashad, your posts are, without exception, pure unadulterated balderdash ! You have never, ever been anywhere even remotely close to India or Pakistan and you are incapable of uttering even two of the simplest Hindi or Urdu words. In other words, you are nothing but a full-fledged shit-brained idiot, so instead of continuously interrupting others with your perpetually meaningless and irrelevant bilge, why don't you leave others to carry on discussions so that you can focus on cleaning the US army toilets ?

K
Last edited by Keffer
Baseman posted:
Abu Jihad posted:
Baseman posted:
Abu Jihad posted:

The current situation is fueled by the fascist move done by Modi to revoke special status of Kashmir unprovoked.  Punjab comes to mind and I would like to see Modi try that there.

There are many places in the world with similar agreement such as Hong Kong, Taiwan, Quebec etc.  Do we take away all of their special status and start a war everywhere, I dont think so.

The "current" situation is not so current.  It was centuries in the making!  Ayuh like start history at the reaction, not the action!  Modi is attempting to reverse the historic "occupation!"

... and this is the classic definition of fascism and your obsession with Modi.  

 

Just wait for other parts of India to start rebelling.

Answer my question you two Islamist freaks.   How did those statues get in the Hindu Kush?

Are the Burmese also Facists?   It was good India did not criticize them.  India has to address the Islamization of parts of India.  

Modi needs to create special incentives to encourage Hindus to resettle Jammu/Kashmir!

Islamist freaks, eh ! You are perfectly free to call or refer to me in any way you like but where I have been, in and around the entire Indian sub-continent, you will never, ever be able to even dream about so you can keep your prejudice, hate and bigotry all to yourself. It is truly a tragedy that your intellect is so woefully under-developed that you are now capable of thinking only along deeply biased and shamelessly prejudicial ways. Furthermore, what I and other Muslims (within Human Concern International) have done and continue to do virtually on a daily basis, without giving any thought whatsoever to the ethnicity or religious beliefs of those to whom we bring relief and assistance ! I have no interest whatsoever in gravitating to your depth of of bias, prejudice and bigotry; that is for you to grapple with. I hope, however, that it will not be too far off in the future when you and others with you deficiency in outlook and thinking come face to face with your prejudice and hatred for other people you have never ever seen or met.

K
Prashad posted:
Keffer posted:
Prashad posted:

Keffer vex bad. Modi destroyed his Kashmir marriage plans. 

Maybe your idol Modi can find you a man; have you thought about that ? Since I will be going to India in a two or three weeks, maybe I can  ask him to help you out !

Keffer I highly doubt that you are going to India. The only India you are going to is an Indian reservation in Ontario.

I have no care or concern over the thinking of dumb latrine-cleaners,particularly those who cannot differentiate their asses from their elbows !

K

Prashad likes his beef curry with roti or dal puri. But he will settle for rice if he cannot get the two and you throw in some potato. I don't think Modi would like someone like me. Nevertheless when in Rome do as the Romans do. In India Prashad will settle for a buffalo burger and fries. Throw in a coke zero with ice please. Killing a person from your ancestors because he or she eats beef is absolutely unacceptable.

Prashad
Stormborn posted:

seems both sides are brutalizing each other.

Islam, a beautiful religion, 1600 years in the making and still demonstrating their beauty. 

Jinnnah, that mangy dog caused so many millions of people to be uprooted and lives lost. So f'ked up is these people that India had to free East Begal from Islam, the beautiful religion.

Now, they want Kashmir. Pakistan should get it, because for sure the Kashmiri muslims will be in hands of the devil and this divine being will certainly have the Pakstani elite having dem eat their own shit. Which they so desrve.  Why these fing ppl love to kill and claiming dey have beautiful beliefs. Dey certainly dresses like demented dead people.

S
seignet posted:
Stormborn posted:

seems both sides are brutalizing each other.

Islam, a beautiful religion, 1600 years in the making and still demonstrating their beauty. 

Jinnnah, that mangy dog caused so many millions of people to be uprooted and lives lost. So f'ked up is these people that India had to free East Begal from Islam, the beautiful religion.

Now, they want Kashmir. Pakistan should get it, because for sure the Kashmiri muslims will be in hands of the devil and this divine being will certainly have the Pakstani elite having dem eat their own shit. Which they so desrve.  Why these fing ppl love to kill and claiming dey have beautiful beliefs. Dey certainly dresses like demented dead people.

Bai Siggy, whah yuh ranting and raving about? Didn't yuh scripture teach dat bloodshed wuz de oney way to connect to God? Yuh do realize dat Islam teaches dat no bloodshed is needed tuh connect tuh God right?

FM

According to Jinnah there is no such thing as India. It was just a British administrative unit created by the British. According to him Muslims and Hindus are two separate people. Jinnah real surname was Takkur. He is a Gujarati like Gandhi and Modi. All four of his grandparents were born Hindus. His father was called Jinne, Which was a nickname meaning skinny. His father converted to Islam because of the caste system in Hinduism and how Jinnah grandfather was treated when he left his caste job as an agricultural merchant to become a fish merchant but eventually wanted to come back to his caste but was prevented by his caste from do this.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad

The Aga Khan who was a half Italian Arab. He was allowed to live in India by the British after he left Iran. The Aga Khan was the Ismali sect leader and lmam.  Aga Khans are decendent of the Prophet (may God bless his great soul) by the Prophet's grandson. He was a leader of the Muslim league of India . Jinnah was an Ismali Muslim.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
ksazma posted:

Wasn't it the British who sow the seeds of distrust in Jinnah's mind? If so, Jinnah was foolish to buy it. Just like all those AFC supporters who foolishly bought that the PNC had really reformed from their wicked ways.

East Bengal was partitioned before the time of Jinnah, some muslim cleric accepted a bribe from the English to proclaim they wanted a muslim enclave. The British did that because of the Calcutta independence movement. Dividing Bengal would weaken the movement.

S
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:

Wasn't it the British who sow the seeds of distrust in Jinnah's mind? If so, Jinnah was foolish to buy it. Just like all those AFC supporters who foolishly bought that the PNC had really reformed from their wicked ways.

East Bengal was partitioned before the time of Jinnah, some muslim cleric accepted a bribe from the English to proclaim they wanted a muslim enclave. The British did that because of the Calcutta independence movement. Dividing Bengal would weaken the movement.

This was something I learned when visiting Calcutta.  Also, Bombay was founded to mitigate the power of Calcutta!  It was an impressive place!

Baseman

In some ways Jinnah was right. Prashad did alot of thinking about this matter. If Hindus can discriminate against their own Hindus then they certainly can discriminate against Muslims. For example, I told an Indian India Hindu woman that me Prashad is shastri (If Anil can call himself a shastri then Prashad can call himself a shastri) the woman started shouting that Prashad is not a shastri but a Maharati. I don't know what a Maharati is. (I wish that I had my buddy keffer there to explain what a Maharati is). I asked the woman how she knew that. She said that she is a Shastri and she never seen a shastri that looks like me.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Prashad posted:

In some ways Jinnah was right. Prashad did alot of thinking about this matter. If Hindus can discriminate against their own Hindus then they certainly can discriminate against Muslims. For example, I told an Indian India Hindu woman that me Prashad is shastri (If Anil can call himself a shastri then Prashad can call himself a shastri) the woman started shouting that Prashad is not a shastri but a Maharati. I don't know what a Maharati is. (I wish that I had my buddy keffer there to explain what a Maharati is). I asked the woman how she knew that. She said that she is a Shastri and she never seen a shastri that looks like me.

Looks like you barn wid gra!!

Baseman

A Pakistan cab driver told me that Pakistan is becoming more and more extreme and its not just Peshawar but in the major cities of Pakistan Punjab. You fellows see Imran Khan wife how she is covered from head to toe. That is certainly not the Imran who use to enjoy a pint at his local English pub.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:

Wasn't it the British who sow the seeds of distrust in Jinnah's mind? If so, Jinnah was foolish to buy it. Just like all those AFC supporters who foolishly bought that the PNC had really reformed from their wicked ways.

East Bengal was partitioned before the time of Jinnah, some muslim cleric accepted a bribe from the English to proclaim they wanted a muslim enclave. The British did that because of the Calcutta independence movement. Dividing Bengal would weaken the movement.

No doubt there has been a lot of stupid Muslims after Muhammad. It is like they never learned anything from Muhammad.

FM
Keffer posted:
Baseman posted:
Abu Jihad posted:

... and this is the classic definition of fascism and your obsession with Modi.  

 

Just wait for other parts of India to start rebelling.

Answer my question you two Islamist freaks.   How did those statues get in the Hindu Kush?

Are the Burmese also Facists?   It was good India did not criticize them.  India has to address the Islamization of parts of India.  

Modi needs to create special incentives to encourage Hindus to resettle Jammu/Kashmir!

Islamist freaks, eh !t.

Yes, why you think you have the copyright on calling people Bigots, Latrine Cleaner, etc!!

Answer nuh!  How did those statues get into the Hindu Kush? 

And as bonus Double Jeopardy question!  Why is it called "Hindu Kush?"

No need to go off on your long-winded tirade!

Baseman
Last edited by Baseman
cain posted:
Baseman posted:

And as bonus Double Jeopardy question!  Why is it called "Hindu Kush?"

Iman smoke some nice Hindu Kush, not bad stuff. Puff puff..pass

Hi Hippie since that stuff is legal I have a few plants, some are about 5 feet tall with lots of buds. Hope you are flying high with the good stuff. . I sold the cottage up North and investing in Michigan. Bought two places very cheap.I will flip. Just be careful what you light up  some joint can make you sick.

K
kp posted:
cain posted:
Baseman posted:

And as bonus Double Jeopardy question!  Why is it called "Hindu Kush?"

Iman smoke some nice Hindu Kush, not bad stuff. Puff puff..pass

Hi Hippie since that stuff is legal I have a few plants, some are about 5 feet tall with lots of buds. Hope you are flying high with the good stuff. . I sold the cottage up North and investing in Michigan. Bought two places very cheap.I will flip. Just be careful what you light up  some joint can make you sick.

You leave the Kawarthas to head South, banna what da heck wrong with you eh? People dem running away from Trump an you running to him, wuhderass.

cain
cain posted:
kp posted:
cain posted:
Baseman posted:

And as bonus Double Jeopardy question!  Why is it called "Hindu Kush?"

Iman smoke some nice Hindu Kush, not bad stuff. Puff puff..pass

Hi Hippie since that stuff is legal I have a few plants, some are about 5 feet tall with lots of buds. Hope you are flying high with the good stuff. . I sold the cottage up North and investing in Michigan. Bought two places very cheap.I will flip. Just be careful what you light up  some joint can make you sick.

You leave the Kawarthas to head South, banna what da heck wrong with you eh? People dem running away from Trump an you running to him, wuhderass.

I live comfortable in TO where Real Estate is very expensive, but I invest in the cheap USA.

K

The problem with real estate is the taxes, the liability insurance and the money for upkeep of the property. These things can be killers. Just ask those China Chinamen who bought properties in British Columbia. They owe millions of dollars in taxes to the municipality. Prashad prefer to own stock in publicly traded real estate companies.

Prashad
Prashad posted:

The problem with real estate is the taxes, the liability insurance and the money for upkeep of the property. These things can be killers. Just ask those China Chinamen who bought properties in British Columbia. They owe millions of dollars in taxes to the municipality. Prashad prefer to own stock in publicly traded real estate companies.

You pay capital gains tax only when you sell and that is on the profit you make. Presently there are not enough rental units in Toronto ,the government encourages private rental units. Near U ft I have several units rented to students some are paid a year in advance.

K
Prashad posted:

KP I am talking about the yearly tax that you have to pay to the municipality plus insurance plus the cost of upkeep plus the mortgage.  It all adds up.

For example I have a two bedroom condo rented for $2500 per month my total monthly expenses adds up to $1900 , I make $600 per month plus appreciated value of the property and every monthly  mort gage payment some goes towards reducing the principal. As usual it's location, location,  location.  $600 Is good return on my downplay mentioned of 20%. Many times I purchase before the ground is broken from the builder.

K
kp posted:
Prashad posted:

KP I am talking about the yearly tax that you have to pay to the municipality plus insurance plus the cost of upkeep plus the mortgage.  It all adds up.

For example I have a two bedroom condo rented for $2500 per month my total monthly expenses adds up to $1900 , I make $600 per month plus appreciated value of the property and every monthly  mort gage payment some goes towards reducing the principal. As usual it's location, location,  location.  $600 Is good return on my downplay mentioned of 20%. Many times I purchase before the ground is broken from the builder.

Bannas, what does Modi have to do with the price of Real Estate in the US....give Trump credit!

Baseman
kp posted:

This Modi shit was a topic to promote which religion is better and posters degrading other people religion, it went wacko Chief calling Hindus Chammars. 

Chief's a poke!  He probably was a chammar before he got forcibly converted!

For the past four pages I have asked how the Statues got into the Hindu Kush.  Them bais running in circles, especially nutcase Keffer!

What you think KP?

Baseman
Baseman posted:
kp posted:

This Modi shit was a topic to promote which religion is better and posters degrading other people religion, it went wacko Chief calling Hindus Chammars. 

Chief's a poke!  He probably was a chammar before he got forcibly converted!

For the past four pages I have asked how the Statues got into the Hindu Kush.  Them bais running in circles, especially nutcase Keffer!

What you think KP?

Honestly ,I don't know  so I cannot contribute. 

K
Baseman posted:
kp posted:

This Modi shit was a topic to promote which religion is better and posters degrading other people religion, it went wacko Chief calling Hindus Chammars. 

Chief's a poke!  He probably was a chammar before he got forcibly converted!

For the past four pages I have asked how the Statues got into the Hindu Kush.  Them bais running in circles, especially nutcase Keffer!

What you think KP?

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

FM

It was not only the Indians that were Buddhists in Afghanistan.  It was also the Greeks that became Buddhists and helped in the spread of Buddhism in Afganistan.  Chandra Gupta who was a powerful Indian King was a Buddhist. His wife was a Greek Princess. Buddhism started in Afghanistan around 25O BC.  In 610 AD the Angel Gabriel appeared to the Prophet. This was a long time between the two religions.

Prashad
Last edited by Prashad
Prashad posted:

It was not only the Indians that were Buddhists in Afghanistan.  It was also the Greeks that became Buddhists and helped in the spread of Buddhism in Afganistan.  Chandra Gupta who was a powerful Indian King was a Buddhist. His wife was a Greek Princess. Buddhism started in Afghanistan around 25O BC.  In 610 AD the Angel Gabriel appeared to the Prophet. This was a long time between the two religions.

Indeed, Buddhism was being practiced in Afghanistan long before Siggy Lord and Savior appeared in Bethlehem. It survived many different eras of external rule as well as after the Muslims arrived there around 642, just 10 years after the passing of Muhammad. Islam is the world's youngest major religion which has had its good and bad elements. I think its good far outweigh its bad but I would not in any way seek to diminish the effects it had on those who sees its bad elements. Only those affected by something are best able to describe it. I like Islam and will always do. Not only because I was born into it but I have experienced its beauty. The tranquility one feels as they prostrate feeling all their worries flow to the carpet below them. That is an experience I will never forget. I have also witness beauty of other religions also. No doubt I fight with Siggy because Siggy fights with me but I would not tell Siggy to stop doing what he is doing. That is between him and his God.

FM
ksazma posted:

Islam is the world's youngest major religion which has had its good and bad elements. I think its good far outweigh its bad but I would not in any way seek to diminish the effects it had on those who sees its bad elements. Only those affected by something are best able to describe it. I like Islam and will always do. Not only because I was born into it but I have experienced its beauty. The tranquility one feels as they prostrate feeling all their worries flow to the carpet below them. That is an experience I will never forget.

there is no doubt in my mind that Islam NEVER taught you that "Blacks are the scourge of the world"

that's all on you and the no-teeth, hood n sheet 'manifesto' crowd you begging all these years to join

just saying 

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Prashad posted:

It was not only the Indians that were Buddhists in Afghanistan.  It was also the Greeks that became Buddhists and helped in the spread of Buddhism in Afganistan.  Chandra Gupta who was a powerful Indian King was a Buddhist. His wife was a Greek Princess. Buddhism started in Afghanistan around 25O BC.  In 610 AD the Angel Gabriel appeared to the Prophet. This was a long time between the two religions.

Watch keffer come in and tell you dah is lie you never been there, he was there among Gupta and his Woman....he even met Gabriel..tarassss.

cain
ksazma posted:
Baseman posted:
kp posted:

This Modi shit was a topic to promote which religion is better and posters degrading other people religion, it went wacko Chief calling Hindus Chammars. 

Chief's a poke!  He probably was a chammar before he got forcibly converted!

For the past four pages I have asked how the Statues got into the Hindu Kush.  Them bais running in circles, especially nutcase Keffer!

What you think KP?

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

When Alexander the Great arrived at the borders of modern day Afghanistan he met King Chandra Gupta. This was in the time period of Before Christ. Buddah was before Alexander the Great. Suh those Buddahs were there even before Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac.

S
ronan posted:
ksazma posted:

Islam is the world's youngest major religion which has had its good and bad elements. I think its good far outweigh its bad but I would not in any way seek to diminish the effects it had on those who sees its bad elements. Only those affected by something are best able to describe it. I like Islam and will always do. Not only because I was born into it but I have experienced its beauty. The tranquility one feels as they prostrate feeling all their worries flow to the carpet below them. That is an experience I will never forget.

there is no doubt in my mind that Islam NEVER taught you that "Blacks are the scourge of the world"

that's all on you and the no-teeth, hood n sheet 'manifesto' crowd you begging all these years to join

just saying 

whey you duz come up wid dem lines? Always an entertainment. 

S

The Mongols around 1000 AD attacked Middle east countries and close to 200 years they occupied those lands. Mysteriously, they decided to trek back to Mongolia. During those 200 years, they come to believe in Islam and its teachings, it suited them well. For they would plunder their way back, invading and imposing Islam. The Arabs were the first to invade the Malabar coast. The Mongols choose the land routes of invasions, first taking Afghanistan and much later Delhi.

S
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

When Alexander the Great arrived at the borders of modern day Afghanistan he met King Chandra Gupta. This was in the time period of Before Christ. Buddah was before Alexander the Great. Suh those Buddahs were there even before Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac.

???

Alexander conquered Egypt circa 330 BC and the Ptolemys ruled up until Rome took over just before Christ

according to Bible legends

Moses lived circa 1200 BC . . .  for the illiterates, that's more than a thousand years before Christ was born

Abraham did his Father-of-Nations thing at least several hundred years before Moses! . . . again, for the illiterates that's venturing into near pre-history - 1800 BC and even further back

Gautama Buddha lived circa 400/500 BC thereabouts

do the math and stop peddling NONSENSE

FM
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:
Baseman posted:
kp posted:

This Modi shit was a topic to promote which religion is better and posters degrading other people religion, it went wacko Chief calling Hindus Chammars. 

Chief's a poke!  He probably was a chammar before he got forcibly converted!

For the past four pages I have asked how the Statues got into the Hindu Kush.  Them bais running in circles, especially nutcase Keffer!

What you think KP?

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

When Alexander the Great arrived at the borders of modern day Afghanistan he met King Chandra Gupta. This was in the time period of Before Christ. Buddah was before Alexander the Great. Suh those Buddahs were there even before Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac.

Bai, dem Buddha statues was built toward the end of the 6th century C.E.

FM
ronan posted:
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

When Alexander the Great arrived at the borders of modern day Afghanistan he met King Chandra Gupta. This was in the time period of Before Christ. Buddah was before Alexander the Great. Suh those Buddahs were there even before Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac.

???

Alexander conquered Egypt circa 330 BC and the Ptolemys ruled up until Rome took over just before Christ

according to Bible legends

Moses lived circa 1200 BC . . .  for the illiterates, that's more than a thousand years before Christ was born

Abraham did his Father-of-Nations thing at least several hundred years before Moses! . . . again, for the illiterates that's venturing into near pre-history - 1800 BC and even further back

Gautama Buddha lived circa 400/500 BC thereabouts

do the math and stop peddling NONSENSE

yuh rite. Moses came from Abraham. I am never too sure about them years-considered speculations. Egyptians says there never a Moses.

Suh I could challenge yuh on that. A wondering what D2 points of view.

 

S
Last edited by seignet
seignet posted:
ronan posted:

Alexander conquered Egypt circa 330 BC and the Ptolemys ruled up until Rome took over just before Christ

according to Bible legends

Moses lived circa 1200 BC . . .  for the illiterates, that's more than a thousand years before Christ was born

Abraham did his Father-of-Nations thing at least several hundred years before Moses! . . . again, for the illiterates that's venturing into near pre-history - 1800 BC and even further back

Gautama Buddha lived circa 400/500 BC thereabouts

do the math and stop peddling NONSENSE

yuh rite. Moses came from Abraham. I am never too sure about them years-considered speculations. Egyptians says there never a Moses.

Suh I could challenge yuh on that. A wondering what D2 points of view.

 

Mr D2 is agnost like me family and buddy 

FM
seignet posted:
ronan posted:
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

When Alexander the Great arrived at the borders of modern day Afghanistan he met King Chandra Gupta. This was in the time period of Before Christ. Buddah was before Alexander the Great. Suh those Buddahs were there even before Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac.

???

Alexander conquered Egypt circa 330 BC and the Ptolemys ruled up until Rome took over just before Christ

according to Bible legends

Moses lived circa 1200 BC . . .  for the illiterates, that's more than a thousand years before Christ was born

Abraham did his Father-of-Nations thing at least several hundred years before Moses! . . . again, for the illiterates that's venturing into near pre-history - 1800 BC and even further back

Gautama Buddha lived circa 400/500 BC thereabouts

do the math and stop peddling NONSENSE

yuh rite. Moses came from Abraham. I am never too sure about them years-considered speculations. Egyptians says there never a Moses.

Suh I could challenge yuh on that. 

what is there to “challenge”?

what exactly about my statement “Bible legends” is it that you don’t understand?

FM
ronan posted:
seignet posted:
ronan posted:
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

When Alexander the Great arrived at the borders of modern day Afghanistan he met King Chandra Gupta. This was in the time period of Before Christ. Buddah was before Alexander the Great. Suh those Buddahs were there even before Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac.

???

Alexander conquered Egypt circa 330 BC and the Ptolemys ruled up until Rome took over just before Christ

according to Bible legends

Moses lived circa 1200 BC . . .  for the illiterates, that's more than a thousand years before Christ was born

Abraham did his Father-of-Nations thing at least several hundred years before Moses! . . . again, for the illiterates that's venturing into near pre-history - 1800 BC and even further back

Gautama Buddha lived circa 400/500 BC thereabouts

do the math and stop peddling NONSENSE

yuh rite. Moses came from Abraham. I am never too sure about them years-considered speculations. Egyptians says there never a Moses.

Suh I could challenge yuh on that. 

what is there to “challenge”?

what exactly about my statement “Bible legends” is it that you don’t understand?

On the point that there was no Moses, according to Muslim Egypt. So those years you stated could be speculative.

S
seignet posted:
ronan posted:
seignet posted:
ronan posted:
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

When Alexander the Great arrived at the borders of modern day Afghanistan he met King Chandra Gupta. This was in the time period of Before Christ. Buddah was before Alexander the Great. Suh those Buddahs were there even before Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac.

???

Alexander conquered Egypt circa 330 BC and the Ptolemys ruled up until Rome took over just before Christ

according to Bible legends

Moses lived circa 1200 BC . . .  for the illiterates, that's more than a thousand years before Christ was born

Abraham did his Father-of-Nations thing at least several hundred years before Moses! . . . again, for the illiterates that's venturing into near pre-history - 1800 BC and even further back

Gautama Buddha lived circa 400/500 BC thereabouts

do the math and stop peddling NONSENSE

yuh rite. Moses came from Abraham. I am never too sure about them years-considered speculations. Egyptians says there never a Moses.

Suh I could challenge yuh on that. 

what is there to “challenge”?

what exactly about my statement “Bible legends” is it that you don’t understand?

On the point that there was no Moses, according to Muslim Egypt. So those years you stated could be speculative.

banna, i am introducing you to a bit of forensic history/archeology/anthropology contextualizing the myths and legends in the Abrahamic and other religious traditions

it doesn’t matter whether these characters existed or not

pay attention, arite?

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Baseman posted:

Muslims are trying to ethnically cleanse the Hindu population and claim the territory just as with Hindu Kush, etc.  This is why the Burmese are reacting and expelling all Muslims.  They cite these historical examples as justification!

Let murdering modi try that shit with "Hindu Kush' and see what happens

 

Pointblank
Pointblank posted:
Baseman posted:

Muslims are trying to ethnically cleanse the Hindu population and claim the territory just as with Hindu Kush, etc.  This is why the Burmese are reacting and expelling all Muslims.  They cite these historical examples as justification!

Let murdering modi try that shit with "Hindu Kush' and see what happens

Nah, he sticking with Jammu/Kashmir.  When he finishes with that only then he may ponder Hindu Kush!  Fair enough?

Baseman

The Annexation of Kashmir

 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s dramatic decision to abrogate the special status of Jammu and Kashmir enshrined in Article 370 of the Indian Constitution seems to have taken the world by surprise. It is an extension of the strategy adopted by Narendra Modi in his statecraft, where the dominant factor dictating his policies is its impact on the Hindutva constituency, who openly root for India to adopt a majoritarian character.

Since 5 August 2019, the situation Kashmir Valley, which has been on a lockdown, is tense. While the Bharatiya Janata Party’s Hindutva backers are rejoicing over the decision, many others are justifying it by arguing that Article 370 had not been able to bring peace in the Valley for seven decades, and how this decision could bring about a change. This argument is problematic, as nowhere in the world has a country brought sustainable peace in a region bedeviled by separatism by taking away whatever limited autonomy that the region enjoyed.

This sort of arbitrary centralization has only two outcomes—a violent insurrection leading to the independence of the territory or brutal state repression resulting in massive human rights violation of the rebelling population. As regional geostrategic political environment dictates such outcomes, the first possibility appears bleak in the case of Kashmir, at least at this point of time. Thus, the second outcome is most likely.

The propaganda being unleashed is that lack of development is the reason for the continued unrest in the Valley and the abolition of special status will bring in massive financial investment from the mainland. This claim is hogwash. The state of Jammu and Kashmir is economically more developed than many northern and eastern Indian states and fares better than Narendra Modi’s Gujarat in the human development indices. The possibility of purchasing land does not itself lead to increased investment. For economic development, you need social peace and political stability. Even the hyper-nationalists in India do not foresee a peaceful Kashmir in the near future.

At present, there is not a single politician in Kashmir who is seen to belong to the mainstream. Three former chief ministers have been arrested without any formal charges against them, making a complete mockery of the law. The stage has been set for the escalation of Kashmir conflict. Modi’s decision has given a new lease of life to the right of self-determination in Kashmir, which will lead to further militarization and loss of lives in the Valley.

While the Indian media is amplifying the government propaganda that all is well in Kashmir, international press has been extremely critical of the massive human rights violations after the abrogation of Article 370. There is no doubt about the increased state oppression in the highly militarized Kashmir Valley—the Kashmiris are the ones that have suffered the most in the bargain and will continue to suffer the most.

India becoming a ‘Hindu Rashtra’ is not just a theoretical possibility anymore. The way constitutional provisions are being circumvented and parliamentary procedures bypassed, anything seems possible now. India’s Constitution has lost its sanctity, and the insecurity of India’s minorities, the Muslims in particular, has increased manifold.

The unilateral abrogation of the special provisions for Kashmir has also raised serious questions about the reliability of India’s commitment to a negotiated settlement. Article 370 was not only a constitutional provision, but also a solemn commitment of the nation to the people of Kashmir at the time of its accession to the Indian Union.

India’s decades-old policy of treating Kashmir as a bilateral issue has also received a major jolt. While Kashmir has become a concern for the international community, India is increasingly being pitted against a Pakistan-China axis. By enforcing this unilateral decision, India has also lost the moral high ground that it has always claimed on Kashmir. True, in a world that is increasingly becoming an assembly of authoritarian regimes wearing populist masks, India might get away with it. But when the global tide turns, India will be at the receiving end.

Modi’s decision on Kashmir will give political dividends to the Hindutva groups in India. Increased violence in Kashmir will help them demonize Muslims in the rest of India, to make political capital out of it. In Pakistan, the military stands to have a bigger say in the country’s politics and governance, especially at a time the United States is looking for a face-saving exit from Afghanistan.

By abrogating Kashmir’s special provisions, Modi has taken a massive step towards promoting violence and bigotry and inflicting serious damage to the region’s aspiration of achieving sustainable peace and development.

AJ
Prashad posted:

Modi needs to go further and take away citizenship from these ungrateful Kashmiris. But first he should give them the option to go to Pakistan.

Or maybe India should let the Kashmiris have their own country and make sure Pakistan is held strongly responsible if they try to take it from the Kashmiris. All of Kashmir should be free from both India and Pakistan as neither have been good for Kashmir.

FM
ronan posted:
seignet posted:
ksazma posted:

Bai, dem Buddha statues were built just in the nick of time. Just a few decades before the Muslims took over Afghanistan once and for all. Amazingly, those statues survived all those centuries of Muslim rule until those Taliban idiots came along and demonstrated their ignorance of Islamic Sharia and the teachings of Muhammad. Muslims are not allowed to destroy any place of worship. The only exception was the Kaaba because the Kaaba was originally built by Abraham and Ishmael for the worship of God. And even then it was not the Kaaba that they were allowed to destroy but rather only the idols which were placed in them after Abraham and Ishmael were long gone from the world. I believe the Indians ruled controlled Afghanistan for less than 50 years before the Muslims rived there.

When Alexander the Great arrived at the borders of modern day Afghanistan he met King Chandra Gupta. This was in the time period of Before Christ. Buddah was before Alexander the Great. Suh those Buddahs were there even before Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac.

???

Alexander conquered Egypt circa 330 BC and the Ptolemys ruled up until Rome took over just before Christ

according to Bible legends

Moses lived circa 1200 BC . . .  for the illiterates, that's more than a thousand years before Christ was born

Abraham did his Father-of-Nations thing at least several hundred years before Moses! . . . again, for the illiterates that's venturing into near pre-history - 1800 BC and even further back

Gautama Buddha lived circa 400/500 BC thereabouts

do the math and stop peddling NONSENSE

Basic history has to be explained to ahwe "brilliant" and "genetically superior" indian brethren, all complicit in Seignet's nonsense by their silence. Just fking amazing, the depth of ignorance hay!

FM
Prashad posted:

Try marrying a white Arab's daughter and you will see what White Arabs are all about.  As one Palestinian Jordanian told Prashad " Because I am a white person the white Americans tell me exactly what they are thinking and feeling" 

In other words, and as usual, you haven't the faintest idea what you're braying about.

GTAngler
Baseman posted:
Prashad posted:

Try marrying a white Arab's daughter and you will see what White Arabs are all about.  As one Palestinian Jordanian told Prashad " Because I am a white person the white Americans tell me exactly what they are thinking and feeling" 

Banna, you look like you suffer nuff rejection!

He also suffers fromTrumplitis...... he lies a lot.

cain
Last edited by cain
Baseman posted:
Prashad posted:

Try marrying a white Arab's daughter and you will see what White Arabs are all about.  As one Palestinian Jordanian told Prashad " Because I am a white person the white Americans tell me exactly what they are thinking and feeling" 

Banna, you look like you suffer nuff rejection!

This chap is a naive clown. I asked two simple questions because I really wanted to know and he responds with unrelated garbage. The only "white arabs" I can think of are the Circassians who were displaced in the 19th century when Russia conquered the Caucuses. As such they are not true ethnic arabs.

GTAngler
GTAngler posted:
Baseman posted:
Prashad posted:

Try marrying a white Arab's daughter and you will see what White Arabs are all about.  As one Palestinian Jordanian told Prashad " Because I am a white person the white Americans tell me exactly what they are thinking and feeling" 

Banna, you look like you suffer nuff rejection!

This chap is a naive clown. I asked two simple questions because I really wanted to know and he responds with unrelated garbage. The only "white arabs" I can think of are the Circassians who were displaced in the 19th century when Russia conquered the Caucuses. As such they are not true ethnic arabs.

What more do white Arabs have to do to show you that they are white. Palastinians and Jordanians have clearly stated that they are white. Their skins are white. Get over it. Your brown skin will never turn white on its own so you will never be his equal. My advice to you is to use some Jamaican skin bleach.

Prashad
Prashad posted:

If you are an East Indian then you are an absolute traitor to your race. You will never be accepted as a white Arab and that is what your brown ass has to live with. You will always have to kiss the feet of the white Arab and clean up his sh-t in Dubai.

I was right. You are a naive bordering on ignorant, clown. You obviously have an inferiority complex. I am East Indian and very proud of it. I don't subscribe to your idiotic and bigoted concept of a separatist East Indian Country so from that standpoint, I am a traitor. By the way, please desist from any interest in my ass. I am not so inclined. 

GTAngler
Prashad posted:
GTAngler posted:
Baseman posted:
Prashad posted:

Try marrying a white Arab's daughter and you will see what White Arabs are all about.  As one Palestinian Jordanian told Prashad " Because I am a white person the white Americans tell me exactly what they are thinking and feeling" 

Banna, you look like you suffer nuff rejection!

This chap is a naive clown. I asked two simple questions because I really wanted to know and he responds with unrelated garbage. The only "white arabs" I can think of are the Circassians who were displaced in the 19th century when Russia conquered the Caucuses. As such they are not true ethnic arabs.

What more do white Arabs have to do to show you that they are white. Palastinians and Jordanians have clearly stated that they are white. Their skins are white. Get over it. Your brown skin will never turn white on its own so you will never be his equal. My advice to you is to use some Jamaican skin bleach.

More idiotic babbling by the resident fool. The toilet cleaners you're sniffing are destroying whatever brain cells you have left.

GTAngler
Last edited by GTAngler
GTAngler posted:
Prashad posted:
GTAngler posted:
Baseman posted:
Prashad posted:

Try marrying a white Arab's daughter and you will see what White Arabs are all about.  As one Palestinian Jordanian told Prashad " Because I am a white person the white Americans tell me exactly what they are thinking and feeling" 

Banna, you look like you suffer nuff rejection!

This chap is a naive clown. I asked two simple questions because I really wanted to know and he responds with unrelated garbage. The only "white arabs" I can think of are the Circassians who were displaced in the 19th century when Russia conquered the Caucuses. As such they are not true ethnic arabs.

What more do white Arabs have to do to show you that they are white. Palastinians and Jordanians have clearly stated that they are white. Their skins are white. Get over it. Your brown skin will never turn white on its own so you will never be his equal. My advice to you is to use some Jamaican skin bleach.

More idiotic babbling by the resident fool. The toilet cleaners you're sniffing are destroying whatever brain cells you have left.

Go tell the white Arab in Dubai that you are his equal. He will connect his Italian shoemaker to your South Asian tailor then put your brown behind in the Paki pit to work.

Prashad

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×