Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

The twisted logic of those who never cease to distort history

July 15, 2014 

DEAR EDITOR,


The contrast in the practice of diplomacy between one and that of the majority begs the question: If every country were to get itself involved in each other’s internal affairs what will the world be like? Surely, international comity would be turned on its head.


International comity is a principle of international law where; “One State, to the greatest extent possible, recognizes the Legislature, executive or judicial acts of another”. The now departed US Ambassador breached this fundamental principle. The central question is; did he act on his own or was he acting in accordance with the imprimatur of the US State Department?


Dr Roger Luncheon, Head of the Presidential Secretariat, made it very clear that Manickchand’s statement had the imprimatur of the State of the Republic of Guyana. At the time of her speaking, she had full powers. So what if Manickchand was “booed and heckled” the question is who did it?
Video footage shows that the usual suspects were involved. These are the individuals who spend their days and nights plotting and planning ways and means of seeing the back of the PPP/C Government.


There is no mystery about the praxis of diplomacy. Diplomats are sent abroad to engage in advocacy for, and to advance the interests of, their country. The ultimate aim is to influence others to support their views. In other words, to make them their allies.


The challenge lies in the application of those interests to the domestic political, economic and social peculiarities of the country to which the diplomat is posted or to “lie” on behalf of their country.


Here in Guyana we host several Ambassadors, High Commissioners, Delegates, and Resident Representatives representing their Governments and International Organizations. They all enjoy the basic privileges and immunities offered and guaranteed by the Government of Guyana.


With the exception of a few sporadic statements that can be described as un-diplomatic and interference in the internal affairs of our country, the majority of diplomats here in Guyana have held steadfastly and honourably to convention and the orthodoxy of diplomatic practice.


The former US Ambassador carved out for himself the role of the elephant in the room.


As regards the claims of Manickchand’s staunch representation of our country’s sovereignty and dignity being a “cuss down”, “vulgar” and “undiplomatic”, all this is nothing more than useless twaddle by a few posturing messiahs and untrustworthy egoists who probably pay no taxes, have no TIN certificate, or make any tangible contribution to improving the well-being of the Guyanese working people.


Like peacocks strutting the diplomatic circuit, this useless bunch displays pretentious airs as traffickers of modern ideas, when in fact they are nothing more than a gathering of gurus of fathomless ignorance.


To those who claim that the PPP depreciates the help rendered by the U.S. to return democracy in 1992, they should be ignored. The PPP has always made reference to the strong support extended first and foremost by US Congressmen and Senators, above all by former President Jimmy Carter and later by President George Bush. That’s part of our history, only ignoramuses would not know that.


But what must never be forgotten or down-played is the decisive, arduous and central role played by the Guyanese people at home and abroad in forcing the PNC to hold free and fair elections.


So here is the logic of the intellectual skunks who never cease to distort history; “when the hand that once helped you now abuses and mocks you, shake it and say “thank you”. To do otherwise would in their view, cast you in the role of a nimakaram.


‘Boysie’ Ramkarran once told me a story. He said one day an Englishman was making the rounds at his East Coast Plantation when, in the presence of one of his gardeners, he expelled a fairly audible flatus (fart). He quickly turned and stared at the gardener and asked “well?” To this the gardener replied “excuse me sah!! Smiling to himself, the Englishman moved on to continue his rounds of his plantation.


I dedicate this story to all those who may wish to play the role of either the gardener or the plantation owner. The choice is theirs.


Clement J. Rohee,
General Secretary
People’s Progressive Party

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The ambassador has been given no reprimand  and is in fact placed in a job of trust since his departure from Guyana. It therefore behooves us to conclude his displeasure at the PPP reticence to facilitate local elections is not merely his personal views but that of his bosses in the state department.

 

Again, it matters not whether Mrs Manichand spoke for the state. Her not the sole authoritative voice in the land merely because it came with the imprimatur of the administration. The opposition speaks with no less authority and they are dismayed that this lady can in their name be so rude in their name. Her cause afterall was an unjust one; hiding behind protocol to mask a glaring democratic deficit.

 

I also detest these venomous suggestion that it is only wastrels object to the PPP ie those that do not pay taxes etc. I wonder what was the productive work of Rohee when he was not in the employ of the state. I also do not believe many are happy at his ability to meet his administrative obligations.

 

There is on doing dissatisfaction with him and open accusations of incompetency.  The PPP and its agents need to get off their high horse because they hold office. Citizens, even the least of them are their bosses. Actually, they work for even the bums in the street so this idea that citizens  cannot speak to their dissatisfaction  without a history og work etc is for the birds. Many will say the scarcity of avenues to be employed is directly a consequence of the PPP being in office.

 

FM

QUOTE: "‘Boysie’ Ramkarran once told me a story. He said one day an Englishman was making the rounds at his East Coast Plantation when, in the presence of one of his gardeners, he expelled a fairly audible flatus (fart). He quickly turned and stared at the gardener and asked “well?” To this the gardener replied “excuse me sah!! Smiling to himself, the Englishman moved on to continue his rounds of his plantation."

 

What prompted the honorable and venerable Boysie Ramkarran to tell Rohee that story?

Mr Ramkarran had more tact than Rohee and was more diplomatic than Rohee. I suspect it was Mr Ramkarran's way of drawing attention to the fact that Rohee was expelling too much flatus in Freedom House.

These days there is no end to Rohee's continual release of verbal flatus.

FM
Originally Posted by Gilbakka:

QUOTE: "‘Boysie’ Ramkarran once told me a story. He said one day an Englishman was making the rounds at his East Coast Plantation when, in the presence of one of his gardeners, he expelled a fairly audible flatus (fart). He quickly turned and stared at the gardener and asked “well?” To this the gardener replied “excuse me sah!! Smiling to himself, the Englishman moved on to continue his rounds of his plantation."

 

What prompted the honorable and venerable Boysie Ramkarran to tell Rohee that story?

Mr Ramkarran had more tact than Rohee and was more diplomatic than Rohee. I suspect it was Mr Ramkarran's way of drawing attention to the fact that Rohee was expelling too much flatus in Freedom House.

These days there is no end to Rohee's continual release of verbal flatus.

LOL! except that Rohee's flatus release can be messy or all wet.

Mitwah

He dedicated his story to everyone not the PPP and disrespectfully categorize them as they haughty or the  confused. I suggest the PPP do not know a difference since here he is suggesting he is more than a man of letters but one with god like wisdom to know he is always right.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×