Skip to main content

Basil doesn't know the task for the CEO is to tabulate valid votes as ascertained after a count by his staff. The CEO is not part of the counting process, his staff - the ROs and the POs, are the ones who calculate ballots and determine valid and invalid votes.

Section 96 of the ROPA doesn't permit nor instruct the CEO to "calculate valid votes"

 

@Django posted:

Nothing to do with LAWYERS, the PPP knows the CCJ don't have Jurisdiction ,the appeal the case trying to get the Judges dictate to the CEO .

If the CCJ judges thought they did not have jurisdiction, why did they not refuse to hear the case? I don't think they would have wanted to waste time. Why did they spend all that time listening and questioning the lawyers who presented and defended it?

@skeldon_man posted:

If the CCJ judges thought they did not have jurisdiction, why did they not refuse to hear the case? I don't think they would have wanted to waste time. Why did they spend all that time listening and questioning the lawyers who presented and defended it?

They have to listen to the submissions ,they can't say no .

Last edited by Django
@Rochelle posted:

True - no NEW President was elected but A President was running for re-election.

Like I said, this can be argued both ways. 

Article 177(4) addressed a president. Ali was not a president running for office. He was a candidate running for the office of the president.
Granger is a de facto president. He was also a candidate running for president. The election is not over until a president is sworn in. Only then you can address a president. Granger is squatting.

Romel Roopnarine

 

LISTEN TO THE APNU/AFC CLAIMS OF ELECTORAL FRAUD BY THE PPP/C UNRAVEL DURING TODAY’S CCJ HEARING

Basil stumbles when asked if he has evidence to substantiate the claims he is making before the Court.

It has been well established that the APNU/AFC attempted several times to rig the elections which is all publicly documented, with global leaders and organizations testifying to that fact.

Their efforts failed as the PPP/C with sheer numbers won the elections by a clear majority. Guyanese voters including former traditional PNC supporters came out in their numbers to eject the APNU/AFC from government after a disastrous period in office.

@Rochelle posted:

Actually, most of the identified fraud and dead people votes were in PPP/C strongholds. Check your people. 

Stop prattling PNC propaganda. How can this happen when PNC controlled all the election apparatus? Where are the proofs of dead or absent voters? Who identified these people? The fraudster himself...Lolofeel. This is all hogwash. If the world wasn't watching, Granger would have pulled his trademark move...Burnhamism.

@skeldon_man posted:

Article 177(4) addressed a president. Ali was not a president running for office. He was a candidate running for the office of the president.
Granger is a de facto president. He was also a candidate running for president. The election is not over until a president is sworn in. Only then you can address a president. Granger is squatting.

Look how Skelly schooling we GNI resident lawyer Rochelle deh. I think Basil and her went to the same law school in August month.

Add Reply

Post

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×