I disagree with portion of this report. Many Guyanese who started out in 2000 are doing well. During the past seventeen years, Guyanese made mistakes in their investment strategy that failed them. However, that time has faded. Many new comers from Guyana are attracted to Schenectady because it's affordable. The Schenectady attraction is increasing rapidly because NYC is too expensive for beginners.     

The Mayor in the early days when Guyanese were buying up Schenectady, he got excited and became corrupted. This was a time when Guyanese were cutting each other throat for survival. All of them wanted to be on the good side of the mayor to feel important.        

The youths are the drug users and pushers. Young people are drinking heavily and driving recklessly, causing accident and death to increase.

First, it were the Blacks and Hispanics. Now, the Guyanese themselves are giving Schenectady a bad name. And so the story goes. 

So which portion of the report you disagree with?

Cobra, we in 2017!!! Are you a Dhabla salesman???

RiffRaff posted:

So which portion of the report you disagree with?

Thay banna confused likea rass.

Guyanese corrupted the Mayor with bribes for choice property! In any event, many guyanese are doing well being the ghetto leeches like the chinese were...suppliers of the basics in their small shops selling low quality crap....

RiffRaff posted:

So which portion of the report you disagree with?

This report is totally strayed from the whole truth about Schenectady. There are many good that Guyanese have done to Schenectady that's missing from the report. Everywhere there Is good and bad, but still people find Schenectady to be home to family, job and leisure, etc., for almost two decades. 

Stormborn posted:

Guyanese corrupted the Mayor with bribes for choice property! In any event, many guyanese are doing well being the ghetto leeches like the chinese were...suppliers of the basics in their small shops selling low quality crap....

What is your source of this information?

Drugb posted:

Stormborn posted:

Guyanese corrupted the Mayor with bribes for choice property! In any event, many guyanese are doing well being the ghetto leeches like the chinese were...suppliers of the basics in their small shops selling low quality crap....

What is your source of this information?

He was hanging out with the bottom of the barrel lot who functioned completely in that relmn. Most are in jail or were indicted or got off by the skin of their teeth

Stormborn posted:

Drugb posted:

Stormborn posted:

Guyanese corrupted the Mayor with bribes for choice property! In any event, many guyanese are doing well being the ghetto leeches like the chinese were...suppliers of the basics in their small shops selling low quality crap....

What is your source of this information?

He was hanging out with the bottom of the barrel lot who functioned completely in that relmn. Most are in jail or were indicted or got off by the skin of their teeth

Apparently you didn't get my question. I repeat, what is your source of the highlighted information. 

Drugb posted:

Stormborn posted:

Drugb posted:

Stormborn posted:

Guyanese corrupted the Mayor with bribes for choice property! In any event, many guyanese are doing well being the ghetto leeches like the chinese were...suppliers of the basics in their small shops selling low quality crap....

What is your source of this information?

He was hanging out with the bottom of the barrel lot who functioned completely in that relmn. Most are in jail or were indicted or got off by the skin of their teeth

Apparently you didn't get my question. I repeat, what is your source of the highlighted information. 

should have added "most likely", to avoid tarnishing his name. He did hang out with a lot of Guyanese crooks who are now in jail or served jail time

I probably visit Schenectady more than anyone else here at GNI. I always visit a place called Niskayuna, NY. Very wealthy and affluent area. 

I sometimes visit the heart of Schenectady and can post my observations.

Crime and Drugs are mainly in African American neighbourhoods and many are on welfare.

Guyanese bought and have invested in areas of Schenectady and have transformed many neighbourhoods. Many Guyanese own multiple homes and have mainly African Americans as tenants.

They (Indo Guyanese) are doing extremely well in Schenectady.

I personally know someone who owns over thirty apartments. African Americans on welfare are a majority of his tenants, (he uses a "section something" term ) to describe their status and how their rent are paid.

The writer of that article needs to have his or her brain examined.

Yuji22

Cobra posted:

RiffRaff posted:

So which portion of the report you disagree with?

This report is totally strayed from the whole truth about Schenectady. There are many good that Guyanese have done to Schenectady that's missing from the report. Everywhere there Is good and bad, but still people find Schenectady to be home to family, job and leisure, etc., for almost two decades. 

Have to agree with Cobra.

This report is flawed.

yuji22 posted:

I probably visit Schenectady more than anyone else here at GNI. I always visit a place called Niskayuna, NY. Very wealthy and affluent area. 

I sometimes visit the heart of Schenectady and can post my observations.

Crime and Drugs are mainly in African American neighbourhoods and many are on welfare.

Guyanese bought and have invested in areas of Schenectady and have transformed many neighbourhoods. Many Guyanese own multiple homes and have mainly African Americans as tenants.

They (Indo Guyanese) are doing extremely well in Schenectady.

I personally know someone who owns over thirty apartments. African Americans on welfare are a majority of his tenants, (he uses a "section something" term ) to describe their status and how their rent are paid.

The writer of that article needs to have his or her brain examined.

Yuji22

 

Sheer sk.....t  you does talk,you don't know any thing about the ole USA,always demeaning Afros,let me inform you there are depressed areas in White neighborhoods and White outnumbered Afros on welfare.

Suh who are the rest of the tenants of the slum lord ???

With a population of 66,041, violent crime in the area is ranked 7th highest in New York while property crime ranks 14th worst in New York.

They are ranked the 7th highest in NY when it comes to violent crime. Someone please list the other six cities that ranked worst.

Django posted: 

Sheer sk.....t  you does talk,you don't know any thing about the ole USA,always demeaning Afros,let me inform you there are depressed areas in White neighborhoods and White outnumbered Afros on welfare.

Suh who are the rest of the tenants of the slum lord ???

Incorrect, percentage wise Blacks are disproportionately on welfare. 

http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

yuji22 posted:

I personally know someone who owns over thirty apartments. African Americans on welfare are a majority of his tenants, (he uses a "section something" term ) to describe their status and how their rent are paid.

The writer of that article needs to have his or her brain examined.

Yuji22

 

This is section 8 assistance.  CaribJ is well aware of this type of entitlement. In the past there were some concern that he was a recipient which he denied. 

Django probably took a black baigan with roti.

I am in Niskayuna, NY almost every weekend in the summertime. How many times a year does he visit Schenectady ? Django opens his loud mouth and speaks nonsense.

Areas around Mount Forest have the highest crimes and drugs. This area is 99 percent African Americans. You dare not drive around some of these neighbourhoods during the night.

I am not blaming blacks or anyone else, this area has been depressed economically for years. Many cannot find work and are forced on welfare. I am just stating the facts.

Indo Guyanese on the other hand, for whatever reason, are able to find work and are doing quite well in Schenectady. As for that landlord, he took his money and invested, that is how America works.

Django, Stop speaking nonsense and opening your aloud mouth in the mornings and making yourself look like a fool. BTW, please enjoy your black baigan with roti.

Yuji22.

Drugb posted:

yuji22 posted:

I personally know someone who owns over thirty apartments. African Americans on welfare are a majority of his tenants, (he uses a "section something" term ) to describe their status and how their rent are paid.

The writer of that article needs to have his or her brain examined.

Yuji22

 

This is section 8 assistance.  CaribJ is well aware of this type of entitlement. In the past there were some concern that he was a recipient which he denied. 

That explains why he is upset when I speak the truth on what I saw with my own eyes in some neighbourhoods in America.

Drugb posted:

Django posted: 

Sheer sk.....t  you does talk,you don't know any thing about the ole USA,always demeaning Afros,let me inform you there are depressed areas in White neighborhoods and White outnumbered Afros on welfare.

Suh who are the rest of the tenants of the slum lord ???

Incorrect, percentage wise Blacks are disproportionately on welfare. 

http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

Welfare Demographics	Percent	Total Number
Percent of welfare recipients who are white / caucasian	16.8 %	11,405,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are black	39.6 %	26,884,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Hispanic	21.2 %	14,392,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Asian or Pacific Islander	18 %	12,220,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Other / Mixed	4.4 %	2,987,000

With African American Americans being 13 percent of the population, those welfare numbers are extremely high. Carib and D2 will soon show up in defence of those high numbers.

yuji22 posted:

Django probably took a black baigan with roti.

I am in Niskayuna, NY almost every weekend in the summertime. How many times a year does he visit Schenectady ? Django opens his loud mouth and speaks nonsense.

Areas around Mount Forest have the highest crimes and drugs. This area is 99 percent African Americans. You dare not drive around some of these neighbourhoods during the night.

I am not blaming blacks or anyone else, this area has been depressed economically for years. Many cannot find work and are forced on welfare. I am just stating the facts.

Indo Guyanese on the other hand, for whatever reason, are able to find work and are doing quite well in Schenectady. As for that landlord, he took his money and invested, that is how America works.

Django, Stop speaking nonsense and opening your aloud mouth in the mornings and making yourself look like a fool. BTW, please enjoy your black baigan with roti.

Yuji22.

 

Banna i was there last month,one of my niece live there.

Kerr you rass you don't know how ole USA works,you are picking on Afros.

Darpoke,always afraid we have an area that are depressed,predominantly Afros,i can go through anytime without fear,I lived there when first migrated,staying at my friend house,who still lives there.

Talking about Roti,not a daily intake the last was a month ago,Django trying to stay healthy.

yuji22 posted:

Drugb posted:

Django posted: 

Sheer sk.....t  you does talk,you don't know any thing about the ole USA,always demeaning Afros,let me inform you there are depressed areas in White neighborhoods and White outnumbered Afros on welfare.

Suh who are the rest of the tenants of the slum lord ???

Incorrect, percentage wise Blacks are disproportionately on welfare. 

http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

Welfare Demographics	Percent	Total Number
Percent of welfare recipients who are white / caucasian	16.8 %	11,405,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are black	39.6 %	26,884,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Hispanic	21.2 %	14,392,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Asian or Pacific Islander	18 %	12,220,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Other / Mixed	4.4 %	2,987,000

With African American Americans being 13 percent of the population, those welfare numbers are extremely high. Carib and D2 will soon show up in defence of those high numbers.

Always pulling from the Net without checking credibility,that is not a Government Website.

Read this article.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...phics_n_6771938.html

Nationally, most of the people who receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program are white. According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.

Django posted:

yuji22 posted:

Drugb posted:

Django posted: 

Sheer sk.....t  you does talk,you don't know any thing about the ole USA,always demeaning Afros,let me inform you there are depressed areas in White neighborhoods and White outnumbered Afros on welfare.

Suh who are the rest of the tenants of the slum lord ???

Incorrect, percentage wise Blacks are disproportionately on welfare. 

http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

Welfare Demographics	Percent	Total Number
Percent of welfare recipients who are white / caucasian	16.8 %	11,405,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are black	39.6 %	26,884,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Hispanic	21.2 %	14,392,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Asian or Pacific Islander	18 %	12,220,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Other / Mixed	4.4 %	2,987,000

With African American Americans being 13 percent of the population, those welfare numbers are extremely high. Carib and D2 will soon show up in defence of those high numbers.

Always pulling from the Net without checking credibility,that is not a Government Website.

Read this article.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...phics_n_6771938.html

Nationally, most of the people who receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program are white. According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.

Snap is only foodstamps, it is not considered welfare. Most elderly will get snap benefits.  The statistics I presented is an excerpt from the department of commerce.

Drugb posted:

Django posted:

yuji22 posted:

Drugb posted:

Django posted: 

Sheer sk.....t  you does talk,you don't know any thing about the ole USA,always demeaning Afros,let me inform you there are depressed areas in White neighborhoods and White outnumbered Afros on welfare.

Suh who are the rest of the tenants of the slum lord ???

Incorrect, percentage wise Blacks are disproportionately on welfare. 

http://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

Welfare Demographics	Percent	Total Number
Percent of welfare recipients who are white / caucasian	16.8 %	11,405,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are black	39.6 %	26,884,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Hispanic	21.2 %	14,392,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Asian or Pacific Islander	18 %	12,220,000
Percent of welfare recipients who are Other / Mixed	4.4 %	2,987,000

With African American Americans being 13 percent of the population, those welfare numbers are extremely high. Carib and D2 will soon show up in defence of those high numbers.

Always pulling from the Net without checking credibility,that is not a Government Website.

Read this article.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...phics_n_6771938.html

Nationally, most of the people who receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program are white. According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.

Snap is only foodstamps, it is not considered welfare. Most elderly will get snap benefits.  The statistics I presented is an excerpt from the department of commerce.

SNAP is part of the welfare system. It is considered as public assistance. People with children who apply for SNAP will also get TANF(temporary Assistance to Needy Families) or cash. These allowances are good until the child(ren) reach the age of 18 or there is an improvement in their finances. Some of these folks who are on public assistance and have children over the age of 5 are required to work 20-30 hours per week.

DrugbSenior Member

25 minutes ago

 

Snap is only foodstamps, it is not considered welfare. Most elderly will get snap benefits.  The statistics I presented is an excerpt from the department of commerce.

 here is info on site

http://www.statisticbrain.com/about/

here is dept of commerce

https://search.commerce.gov/se...filiate=commerce.gov

Educate yourself what are US welfare programs,ask Yugi to join you.

http://federalsafetynet.com/welfare-definition.html

skeldon_man posted:

SNAP is part of the welfare system. It is considered as public assistance. People with children who apply for SNAP will also get TANF(temporary Assistance to Needy Families) or cash. These allowances are good until the child(ren) reach the age of 18 or there is an improvement in their finances. Some of these folks who are on public assistance and have children over the age of 5 are required to work 20-30 hours per week.

SNAP benefits are given to you each month on a plastic card called an EBT(electronic benefits transfer) card, which works like a debit card. ... SNAP is a nutrition program. It is not a welfare cash assistance program (which is called TAFDC). You do not have to be receiving TAFDC to get SNAP — these are separate programs.

http://www.gettingfoodstamps.org/whatissnap.html

While the snap program is administered by the welfare dept, it is generally not considered "welfare" in the traditional sense. 

Drugb posted:

skeldon_man posted:

SNAP is part of the welfare system. It is considered as public assistance. People with children who apply for SNAP will also get TANF(temporary Assistance to Needy Families) or cash. These allowances are good until the child(ren) reach the age of 18 or there is an improvement in their finances. Some of these folks who are on public assistance and have children over the age of 5 are required to work 20-30 hours per week.

SNAP benefits are given to you each month on a plastic card called an EBT(electronic benefits transfer) card, which works like a debit card. ... SNAP is a nutrition program. It is not a welfare cash assistance program (which is called TAFDC). You do not have to be receiving TAFDC to get SNAP — these are separate programs.

http://www.gettingfoodstamps.org/whatissnap.html

 

While the snap program is administered by the welfare dept, it is generally not considered "welfare" in the traditional sense. 

Banna you beating around the bush,

read here

Now do some research from 'real source" and show us the breakdown of recipients of US Welfare System.

Drugb posted:

skeldon_man posted:

SNAP is part of the welfare system. It is considered as public assistance. People with children who apply for SNAP will also get TANF(temporary Assistance to Needy Families) or cash. These allowances are good until the child(ren) reach the age of 18 or there is an improvement in their finances. Some of these folks who are on public assistance and have children over the age of 5 are required to work 20-30 hours per week.

SNAP benefits are given to you each month on a plastic card called an EBT(electronic benefits transfer) card, which works like a debit card. ... SNAP is a nutrition program. It is not a welfare cash assistance program (which is called TAFDC). You do not have to be receiving TAFDC to get SNAP — these are separate programs.

http://www.gettingfoodstamps.org/whatissnap.html

 

While the snap program is administered by the welfare dept, it is generally not considered "welfare" in the traditional sense. 

I worked 5 years for the welfare system. The programs are for low income people.
SNAP is a nutrition program. It is not a welfare cash assistance program. If you do get cash and food stamp, both benefits are loaded to your EBT card and you can only withdraw the cash part of your benefits. The rest of the benefits must be redeemed for food. If you do live below certain income level, you do get these benefits administered by DHS. There are about 8 different programs like SNAP, TANF, AABD...
I know of a Guyanese lady(about 75 years old), never worked a day in her life in US, yet she collects FS and cash, rent, etc. She is considered a welfare recipient.

Django posted:

Drugb posted:

skeldon_man posted:

SNAP is part of the welfare system. It is considered as public assistance. People with children who apply for SNAP will also get TANF(temporary Assistance to Needy Families) or cash. These allowances are good until the child(ren) reach the age of 18 or there is an improvement in their finances. Some of these folks who are on public assistance and have children over the age of 5 are required to work 20-30 hours per week.

SNAP benefits are given to you each month on a plastic card called an EBT(electronic benefits transfer) card, which works like a debit card. ... SNAP is a nutrition program. It is not a welfare cash assistance program (which is called TAFDC). You do not have to be receiving TAFDC to get SNAP — these are separate programs.

http://www.gettingfoodstamps.org/whatissnap.html

 

While the snap program is administered by the welfare dept, it is generally not considered "welfare" in the traditional sense. 

Banna you beating around the bush,

read here

Now do some research from 'real source" and show us the breakdown of recipients of US Welfare System.

Normally you don't proclaim a person to be on welfare if they just get food stamps. Welfare in the general sense refers to a person out of work, not collecting unemployment and able to work but is unemployed.  You should not paint was a broad brush and proclaim a person on welfare if they just collect food stamps. Just my opinion. Many elderly on SSN benefits who are retired are getting food stamps and supplemental health care assistance. Now if you want to classify these retired folks as being on "welfare" then that it your prerogative. 

Drugb posted:

Normally you don't proclaim a person to be on welfare if they just get food stamps. Welfare in the general sense refers to a person out of work, not collecting unemployment and able to work but is unemployed.  You should not paint was a broad brush and proclaim a person on welfare if they just collect food stamps. Just my opinion. Many elderly on SSN benefits who are retired are getting food stamps and supplemental health care assistance. Now if you want to classify these retired folks as being on "welfare" then that it your prerogative. 

the term was broadly applicable to the national welfare ie a safety net to capture those failing a baseline in specific areas from child care, health care, poverty as distinct from corporate welfare. Corporate welfare is gargantum and it all goes to white folks! The numbers above is self evidently bogus.

Why don't you "smart" people edit your post so quotes are not duplicated and the thread becones a mess?

skeldon_man posted:

I worked 5 years for the welfare system. The programs are for low income people.
SNAP is a nutrition program. It is not a welfare cash assistance program. If you do get cash and food stamp, both benefits are loaded to your EBT card and you can only withdraw the cash part of your benefits. The rest of the benefits must be redeemed for food. If you do live below certain income level, you do get these benefits administered by DHS. There are about 8 different programs like SNAP, TANF, AABD...
I know of a Guyanese lady(about 75 years old), never worked a day in her life in US, yet she collects FS and cash, rent, etc. She is considered a welfare recipient.

Apparently for a person working in the system for 5 years, you are not discerning of the term.

This definition may assist us in a consensus. 

Welfare dependency is the state in which a person or household is reliant on government welfare benefits for their income for a prolonged period of time, and without which they would not be able to meet the expenses of daily living. The United States Department of Health and Human Services defines welfare dependency as the proportion of all individuals in families which receive more than 50 percent of their total annual income from Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), food stamps, and/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits.^[1] Typically viewed as a social problem, it has been the subject of major welfare reform efforts since the mid-20th century, primarily focused on trying to make recipients self-sufficient through paid work. While the term "welfare dependency" can be used pejoratively, for the purposes of this article it shall be used to indicate a particular situation of persistent poverty.

Chief posted:

Cobra posted:

RiffRaff posted:

So which portion of the report you disagree with?

This report is totally strayed from the whole truth about Schenectady. There are many good that Guyanese have done to Schenectady that's missing from the report. Everywhere there Is good and bad, but still people find Schenectady to be home to family, job and leisure, etc., for almost two decades. 

Have to agree with Cobra.

This report is flawed.

the report was about the city at large and no mention was made of Guyanese. 

That city is in fact a mess with its most enterprising residents fleeing to more lucrative places. I bet that the kids of these Guyanese migrants will do the same as soon as they can.

Drugb posted:

yuji22 posted:

I personally know someone who owns over thirty apartments. African Americans on welfare are a majority of his tenants, (he uses a "section something" term ) to describe their status and how their rent are paid.

The writer of that article needs to have his or her brain examined.

Yuji22

 

This is section 8 assistance.  CaribJ is well aware of this type of entitlement. In the past there were some concern that he was a recipient which he denied. 

Druggie doesn't cease to scream about being a proud member of the Indo KKK.  Some one is black so must be on welfare in the scrambled mind of this drug addict.

Druggie among immigrant groups in NYC I bet you wouldn't guess which have the highest welfare dependence.  Jews.  Which have the lowest.  Black immigrants.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...verty_n_5240355.html

These measure poor and near poor rates in NYC.  Note that Asians have the highest and blacks only higher than it is for whites.

So go haul your crack and opioid addicted brain elsewhere. You can take your Indo KKK buddy Ksaz with you as well.

caribny posted:

Druggie doesn't cease to scream about being a proud member of the Indo KKK.  Some one is black so must be on welfare in the scrambled mind of this drug addict.

Druggie among immigrant groups in NYC I bet you wouldn't guess which have the highest welfare dependence.  Jews.  Which have the lowest.  Black immigrants.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...verty_n_5240355.html

These measure poor and near poor rates in NYC.  Note that Asians have the highest and blacks only higher than it is for whites.

So go haul your crack and opioid addicted brain elsewhere. You can take your Indo KKK buddy Ksaz with you as well.

Stop throwing a tantrum, don't blame the messenger.  I just report what data is collected. Either way I don't care if blacks are 0% or 50% in poverty. The numbers don't lie. 

Drugb posted:

caribny posted:

Druggie doesn't cease to scream about being a proud member of the Indo KKK.  Some one is black so must be on welfare in the scrambled mind of this drug addict.

Druggie among immigrant groups in NYC I bet you wouldn't guess which have the highest welfare dependence.  Jews.  Which have the lowest.  Black immigrants.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...verty_n_5240355.html

These measure poor and near poor rates in NYC.  Note that Asians have the highest and blacks only higher than it is for whites.

So go haul your crack and opioid addicted brain elsewhere. You can take your Indo KKK buddy Ksaz with you as well.

Stop throwing a tantrum, don't blame the messenger.  I just report what data is collected. Either way I don't care if blacks are 0% or 50% in poverty. The numbers don't lie. 

the numbers say that blacks in NYC aren't the poorest group and to your shock that distinction becomes to Asians.  In addition 95% of Jamaicans are NOT on public assistance.  I use them as a proxy for black immigrants from the English speaking Caribbean.

So you need to cease your racist nonsense that black immigrants are a welfare dependent group.

And you are a messenger for hatred and bigotry.  That is the only message that you bring.

Carribean immigrants who also classified themselves as blacks are doing way better than African Americans in NYc.

caribny posted:

the numbers say that blacks in NYC aren't the poorest group and to your shock that distinction becomes to Asians.  In addition 95% of Jamaicans are NOT on public assistance.  I use them as a proxy for black immigrants from the English speaking Caribbean.

So you need to cease your racist nonsense that black immigrants are a welfare dependent group.

And you are a messenger for hatred and bigotry.  That is the only message that you bring.

Asians are a very broad group. Now you lump chinee man with the rest of us.

See below and weep.

Asian Americans Are the Poorest Minority Group in New York City

ByKhier Casino

Posted on March 1, 2017

 

caribny posted:

Drugb posted:

caribny posted:

Druggie doesn't cease to scream about being a proud member of the Indo KKK.  Some one is black so must be on welfare in the scrambled mind of this drug addict.

Druggie among immigrant groups in NYC I bet you wouldn't guess which have the highest welfare dependence.  Jews.  Which have the lowest.  Black immigrants.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...verty_n_5240355.html

These measure poor and near poor rates in NYC.  Note that Asians have the highest and blacks only higher than it is for whites.

So go haul your crack and opioid addicted brain elsewhere. You can take your Indo KKK buddy Ksaz with you as well.

Stop throwing a tantrum, don't blame the messenger.  I just report what data is collected. Either way I don't care if blacks are 0% or 50% in poverty. The numbers don't lie. 

the numbers say that blacks in NYC aren't the poorest group and to your shock that distinction becomes to Asians.  In addition 95% of Jamaicans are NOT on public assistance.  I use them as a proxy for black immigrants from the English speaking Caribbean.

So you need to cease your racist nonsense that black immigrants are a welfare dependent group.

And you are a messenger for hatred and bigotry.  That is the only message that you bring.

Blacks from the west indies came to Europe and NA better educated than most unil H1B begin to operate with indians. In England for example, west indian blacks earn on average better than most white folks. Black Guyanese are not spoken of often but in the US, they are compared to Indians the most with college degrees.

BTW american civil rights leaders have a high proportion of individuals from the west indies.

Chief posted:

Carribean immigrants who also classified themselves as blacks are doing way better than African Americans in NYc.

Al Sharpton would disagree with you.

Stormborn posted:

caribny posted:

Drugb posted:

caribny posted:

Druggie doesn't cease to scream about being a proud member of the Indo KKK.  Some one is black so must be on welfare in the scrambled mind of this drug addict.

Druggie among immigrant groups in NYC I bet you wouldn't guess which have the highest welfare dependence.  Jews.  Which have the lowest.  Black immigrants.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...verty_n_5240355.html

These measure poor and near poor rates in NYC.  Note that Asians have the highest and blacks only higher than it is for whites.

So go haul your crack and opioid addicted brain elsewhere. You can take your Indo KKK buddy Ksaz with you as well.

Stop throwing a tantrum, don't blame the messenger.  I just report what data is collected. Either way I don't care if blacks are 0% or 50% in poverty. The numbers don't lie. 

the numbers say that blacks in NYC aren't the poorest group and to your shock that distinction becomes to Asians.  In addition 95% of Jamaicans are NOT on public assistance.  I use them as a proxy for black immigrants from the English speaking Caribbean.

So you need to cease your racist nonsense that black immigrants are a welfare dependent group.

And you are a messenger for hatred and bigotry.  That is the only message that you bring.

Blacks from the west indies came to Europe and NA better educated than most unil H1B begin to operate with indians. In England for example, west indian blacks earn on average better than most white folks. Black Guyanese are not spoken of often but in the US, they are compared to Indians the most with college degrees.

 

BTW american civil rights leaders have a high proportion of individuals from the west indies.

If this is the case then kudos to my fellow Guyanese. I love to see my people make progress.

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

 

If this is the case then kudos to my fellow Guyanese. I love to see my people make progress.

Hope Caribj kisses you. 

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Chief posted:

Carribean immigrants who also classified themselves as blacks are doing way better than African Americans in NYc.

Al Sharpton would disagree with you.

Why do you think he would.  A common lament of black Americans of his generation is that "these West Indians take all the jobs, and all the houses".  The debate isn't that black immigrants do better. Its about WHY they do better. 

Statistics indicate that black immigrants do better ONLY among those who are less educated.  Black Americans with college degrees do better than black immigrants. Black Americans who didn't finish high school do tremendously worse.  So the problem isn't among black Americans overall. Its among those locked in the poverty syndrome.