GECOM Chair will hold press conference on November 8

Topics

Django

October 31 2019

Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) Chair, (ret’d) Justice Claudette Singh S.C told reporters last Tuesday that she will hold a press conference to address matters related to GECOM’s preparations for the March 2, 2020 General and Regional Elections

This comes after both the political opposition and the Guyana Press Association (GPA) called on her to make herself available to the press to clarify matters before the Commission and the Secretariat.She had told Kaieteur News that she would speak to the press when decisions are being made, and several decisions were made at last Tuesday’s statutory meeting.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Former Member

That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.

10/31/199:55 AM

NehruBig Mouth Member

This woman is a DISGRACE and a big disappointment!! She thinks she still lives in a Cave!!!

10/31/1910:13 AM

DjangoAdmin

ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.

Claudette Singh in her younger days .

10/31/1910:34 AM

Bibi HaniffaGNI Queen

I hope she doesn’t mistakenly give out the election results during the press conference.

10/31/1911:23 AM

TolaSenior Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.
Claudette Singh in her younger days .

Quite a beautiful lady in her younger days.

It is naïve to think that a person's body don't change in their senior years, especially with illness.

10/31/1911:57 AM

Former Member

Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.

10/31/1912:07 PM

NehruBig Mouth Member

Beautiful but compromised, selfish, lacks decency, integrity anf HONOR!!

10/31/1912:07 PM

Hugh JorganNew Member

Nehru posted:
Beautiful but compromised, selfish, lacks decency, integrity anf HONOR!!

Beautiful???? Are we looking at the same picture?

10/31/1912:17 PM

GTAnglerSenior Member

Hugh Jorgan posted:
Nehru posted:
Beautiful but compromised, selfish, lacks decency, integrity anf HONOR!!
Beautiful???? Are we looking at the same picture?

Nehru probably had a liquid lunch.

10/31/1912:19 PM

Sheik101Senior Member

ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.

U love dat woman with a passion, nah bai?

10/31/1912:25 PM

kpHonorary Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.
Claudette Singh in her younger days .

That's when she was a PPP, now she is an UGLY PNC Devil.

10/31/191:00 PM

alena06Senior Member

Nehru posted:
Beautiful but compromised, selfish, lacks decency, integrity anf HONOR!!

Like you jump the fence and lose your sight. 😀

10/31/191:04 PM

DjangoAdmin

kp posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.
Claudette Singh in her younger days .
That's when she was a PPP, now she is an UGLY PNC Devil.

When was she linked to the PPP ? refresh your memory

http://www.ipsnews.net/2001/01...ys-high-court-judge/

10/31/191:06 PM

NehruBig Mouth Member

alena06 posted:
Nehru posted:
Beautiful but compromised, selfish, lacks decency, integrity anf HONOR!!
Like you jump the fence and lose your sight. 😀

Alena, I was referring to the Photo from 100 years ago

10/31/191:11 PM

kpHonorary Member

Django posted:
kp posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.
Claudette Singh in her younger days .
That's when she was a PPP, now she is an UGLY PNC Devil.
When was she linked to the PPP ? refresh your memory
http://www.ipsnews.net/2001/01...ys-high-court-judge/

TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.

10/31/191:19 PM

DjangoAdmin

kp posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.
Claudette Singh in her younger days .
That's when she was a PPP, now she is an UGLY PNC Devil.
When was she linked to the PPP ? refresh your memory
http://www.ipsnews.net/2001/01...ys-high-court-judge/
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.

Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.

10/31/191:23 PM

Former Member

Sheik101 posted:
ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.
U love dat woman with a passion, nah bai?

Like I love malathion bai. 😀

That woman is a disgrace to the human race.

10/31/191:25 PM

Former Member

Prince posted:
Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.

Prince, was she Jagdeo’s appointee or Jagdeo’s nominee? I have a problem with her because she is corrupt and incompetent not to mention the fac that’s she is the lapdog of Basil Williams and the DAG. I also have a problem with Jagdeo who nominated her and despite the fact that she has exposed her corruption and incompetence since her appointment by DAG, continues to say that he has complete faith in her. Question is this. Does Bharrat Jagdeo have faith in Claudette Singh or has he lost faith in Claudette Singh?

10/31/191:27 PM

kpHonorary Member

Django posted:
kp posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.
Claudette Singh in her younger days .
That's when she was a PPP, now she is an UGLY PNC Devil.
When was she linked to the PPP ? refresh your memory
http://www.ipsnews.net/2001/01...ys-high-court-judge/
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.

Open that link and read it a few times and you will see what I mean.

10/31/191:27 PM

DjangoAdmin

kp posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
That woman’s face looks very evil. Ideal for today given that it is Halloween.
Claudette Singh in her younger days .
That's when she was a PPP, now she is an UGLY PNC Devil.
When was she linked to the PPP ? refresh your memory
http://www.ipsnews.net/2001/01...ys-high-court-judge/
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Open that link and read it a few times and you will see what I mean.

Don't have to , i clearly understand her stance currently as GECOM Chairman.

10/31/191:30 PM

NehruBig Mouth Member

Dondadda posted:
Prince posted:
Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.
Prince, was she Jagdeo’s appointee or Jagdeo’s nominee? I have a problem with her because she is corrupt and incompetent not to mention the fac that’s she is the lapdog of Basil Williams and the DAG. I also have a problem with Jagdeo who nominated her and despite the fact that she has exposed her corruption and incompetence since her appointment by DAG, continues to say that he has complete faith in her. Question is this. Does Bharrat Jagdeo have faith in Claudette Singh or has he lost faith in Claudette Singh?

I have to agree with you to a point. But Jagdeo was hoping she is human, decent and honorable. She is just another HO!!!

10/31/191:34 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.

Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?

10/31/191:41 PM

DjangoAdmin

ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?

The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.

Attached is the Law.

Attachments

Hide

Files (1)

gy_NATIONAL REGISTRATION ACT.pdf

10/31/191:55 PM

Former Member

@Django. Your familiarity with various Acts of Parliament could be handsomely rewarded one fine day with an honorary doctorate of Law. And I won't be surprised if those frauds at UWI initiate the award. Keep on trucking.

10/31/193:01 PM

NehruBig Mouth Member

What a nice way to say " What a DUMB ASS you are"

10/31/193:12 PM

BasemanSenior Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.

Why you asking these stupid questions on FB! I saw yuh last night making trouble! It’s not cards from 2008. It’s card for people who have not voted since 2008! Jagdeo is correct. You don’t need a card to vote! Cards are issued from age 14 for reasons apart from voting! You can also use your passport or driver’s lic as ID to vote! So you cannot just delete names because they don’t pick up cards! This is electoral fraud!

You PNCites trying ever trick to suppress voters! I don’t care who wins, but it must be free!

10/31/195:31 PM

NehruBig Mouth Member

Base, Bhai nah waste time with a certified MUD HEAD!! When stupidity was sharing he ran at the front of the line!!! And he seems not to be embarrassed by the blatant stupidity!!!

10/31/195:38 PM

DjangoAdmin

Baseman posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
Why you asking these stupid questions on FB! I saw yuh last night making trouble!
It’s not cards from 2008.
It’s card for people who have not voted since 2008!
Jagdeo is correct. You don’t need a card to vote! Cards are issued from age 14 for reasons apart from voting! You can also use your passport or driver’s lic as ID to vote! So you cannot just delete names because they don’t pick up cards! This is electoral fraud!
You PNCites trying ever trick to suppress voters! I don’t care who wins, but it must be free!

Did i ask a question or made a comment ? regarding the ID Cards not uplifted since 2008.

How do you know these people haven't voted or migrated ?

10/31/195:56 PM

DjangoAdmin

Nehru posted:
Base, Bhai nah waste time with a certified MUD HEAD!! When stupidity was sharing he ran at the front of the line!!! And he seems not to be embarrassed by the blatant stupidity!!!

Why you pushing your self, when big people talking ?

10/31/195:57 PM

kpHonorary Member

Baseman posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
Why you asking these stupid questions on FB! I saw yuh last night making trouble! It’s not cards from 2008. It’s card for people who have not voted since 2008! Jagdeo is correct. You don’t need a card to vote! Cards are issued from age 14 for reasons apart from voting! You can also use your passport or driver’s lic as ID to vote! So you cannot just delete names because they don’t pick up cards! This is electoral fraud!
You PNCites trying ever trick to suppress voters! I don’t care who wins, but it must be free!

And Fair. It defeats their objective to rig.

10/31/195:59 PM

DjangoAdmin

kp posted:
Baseman posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
Why you asking these stupid questions on FB! I saw yuh last night making trouble! It’s not cards from 2008. It’s card for people who have not voted since 2008! Jagdeo is correct. You don’t need a card to vote! Cards are issued from age 14 for reasons apart from voting! You can also use your passport or driver’s lic as ID to vote! So you cannot just delete names because they don’t pick up cards! This is electoral fraud!
You PNCites trying ever trick to suppress voters! I don’t care who wins, but it must be free!
And Fair. It defeats their objective to rig.

Claims and Objection ending soon , where are the Haitians ???

10/31/196:04 PM

DjangoAdmin

Dondadda posted:
Prince posted:
Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.
Prince, was she Jagdeo’s appointee or Jagdeo’s nominee? I have a problem with her because she is corrupt and incompetent not to mention the fac that’s she is the lapdog of Basil Williams and the DAG. I also have a problem with Jagdeo who nominated her and despite the fact that she has exposed her corruption and incompetence since her appointment by DAG, continues to say that he has complete faith in her. Question is this. Does Bharrat Jagdeo have faith in Claudette Singh or has he lost faith in Claudette Singh?

Is there any one in Guyana , that fits the trust of PPP supporters ?

10/31/196:07 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Prince posted:
Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.
Prince, was she Jagdeo’s appointee or Jagdeo’s nominee? I have a problem with her because she is corrupt and incompetent not to mention the fac that’s she is the lapdog of Basil Williams and the DAG. I also have a problem with Jagdeo who nominated her and despite the fact that she has exposed her corruption and incompetence since her appointment by DAG, continues to say that he has complete faith in her. Question is this. Does Bharrat Jagdeo have faith in Claudette Singh or has he lost faith in Claudette Singh?

Is there any one in Guyana , that fits the trust of PPP supporters ?

Dr Django, you Prapa working hard for this pay check.

10/31/196:21 PM

kpHonorary Member

Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Prince posted:
Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.
Prince, was she Jagdeo’s appointee or Jagdeo’s nominee? I have a problem with her because she is corrupt and incompetent not to mention the fac that’s she is the lapdog of Basil Williams and the DAG. I also have a problem with Jagdeo who nominated her and despite the fact that she has exposed her corruption and incompetence since her appointment by DAG, continues to say that he has complete faith in her. Question is this. Does Bharrat Jagdeo have faith in Claudette Singh or has he lost faith in Claudette Singh?

Is there any one in Guyana , that fits the trust of PPP supporters ?
Dr Django, you Prapa working hard for this pay check.

He has to double up, there is no Mitwah .

10/31/196:31 PM

DjangoAdmin

Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Prince posted:
Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.
Prince, was she Jagdeo’s appointee or Jagdeo’s nominee? I have a problem with her because she is corrupt and incompetent not to mention the fac that’s she is the lapdog of Basil Williams and the DAG. I also have a problem with Jagdeo who nominated her and despite the fact that she has exposed her corruption and incompetence since her appointment by DAG, continues to say that he has complete faith in her. Question is this. Does Bharrat Jagdeo have faith in Claudette Singh or has he lost faith in Claudette Singh?

Is there any one in Guyana , that fits the trust of PPP supporters ?
Dr Django, you Prapa working hard for this pay check.

My foot !!!! try something else.

10/31/196:36 PM

DjangoAdmin

kp posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Prince posted:
Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.
Prince, was she Jagdeo’s appointee or Jagdeo’s nominee? I have a problem with her because she is corrupt and incompetent not to mention the fac that’s she is the lapdog of Basil Williams and the DAG. I also have a problem with Jagdeo who nominated her and despite the fact that she has exposed her corruption and incompetence since her appointment by DAG, continues to say that he has complete faith in her. Question is this. Does Bharrat Jagdeo have faith in Claudette Singh or has he lost faith in Claudette Singh?

Is there any one in Guyana , that fits the trust of PPP supporters ?
Dr Django, you Prapa working hard for this pay check.
He has to double up, there is no Mitwah .

Double up !!! LOL

10/31/196:37 PM

Former Member

Gilbakka posted:
@Django. Your familiarity with various Acts of Parliament could be handsomely rewarded one fine day with an honorary doctorate of Law. And I won't be surprised if those frauds at UWI initiate the award. Keep on trucking.

the slopster is being fed information from a team of pnc back office cronies, he is just the front man.

10/31/196:52 PM

kpHonorary Member

Django posted:
kp posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Prince posted:
Folks, she is Jagdeo's appointee. Who else has a problem with her? The same way you degrade her ability to conduct a fair election, you should also find fault with Jagdeo and the PPP.
Prince, was she Jagdeo’s appointee or Jagdeo’s nominee? I have a problem with her because she is corrupt and incompetent not to mention the fac that’s she is the lapdog of Basil Williams and the DAG. I also have a problem with Jagdeo who nominated her and despite the fact that she has exposed her corruption and incompetence since her appointment by DAG, continues to say that he has complete faith in her. Question is this. Does Bharrat Jagdeo have faith in Claudette Singh or has he lost faith in Claudette Singh?

Is there any one in Guyana , that fits the trust of PPP supporters ?
Dr Django, you Prapa working hard for this pay check.
He has to double up, there is no Mitwah .
Double up !!! LOL

Lighten up, people are having fun at your expense.

10/31/196:53 PM

DjangoAdmin

Drugb posted:
Gilbakka posted:
@Django. Your familiarity with various Acts of Parliament could be handsomely rewarded one fine day with an honorary doctorate of Law. And I won't be surprised if those frauds at UWI initiate the award. Keep on trucking.
the slopster is being fed information from a team of pnc back office cronies, he is just the front man.

No information from no one and no front man for anyone.

10/31/197:01 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.

If their names are not on the voters list, are they going to still be able to vote?

10/31/197:31 PM

kpHonorary Member

Django posted:
Drugb posted:
Gilbakka posted:
@Django. Your familiarity with various Acts of Parliament could be handsomely rewarded one fine day with an honorary doctorate of Law. And I won't be surprised if those frauds at UWI initiate the award. Keep on trucking.
the slopster is being fed information from a team of pnc back office cronies, he is just the front man.
No information from no one and no front man for anyone.

Puppet, puppet no puppet. !!!

10/31/197:38 PM

kpHonorary Member

ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
If their names are not on the voters list, are they going to still be able to vote?

You can be a born Guyanese live your entire life in Guyana and if your name is not on the list you can't vote. But you can come from Haiti and get registered by rhe PNC you can vote. Voting is the counting of the ballots one by one that every eligible voter cast.

10/31/197:46 PM

DjangoAdmin

ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
If their names are not on the voters list, are they going to still be able to vote?

How will they vote when their names are not on the list. The voters list is padded , recommendations was made for H2H. Well we all know what played out to avoid the H2H.

10/31/197:47 PM

DjangoAdmin

kp posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
If their names are not on the voters list, are they going to still be able to vote?
You can be a born Guyanese live your entire life in Guyana and if your name is not on the list you can't vote.
But you can come from Haiti and get registered by rhe PNC you can vote.
Voting is the counting of the ballots one by one that every eligible voter cast.

How come they aren't found and objections made to their names on the voters list ?

10/31/197:49 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
If their names are not on the voters list, are they going to still be able to vote?
How will they vote when their names are not on the list. The voters list is padded , recommendations was made for H2H. Well we all know what played out to avoid the H2H.

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?

H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.

The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?

10/31/197:53 PM

kpHonorary Member

Django posted:
kp posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
If their names are not on the voters list, are they going to still be able to vote?
You can be a born Guyanese live your entire life in Guyana and if your name is not on the list you can't vote.
But you can come from Haiti and get registered by rhe PNC you can vote.
Voting is the counting of the ballots one by one that every eligible voter cast.
How come they aren't found and objections made to their names on the voters list ?

Once they are given a voter ID card, who would argue. They will show up on election day and vote

10/31/198:08 PM

BasemanSenior Member

Django posted:
Baseman posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
Why you asking these stupid questions on FB! I saw yuh last night making trouble!
It’s not cards from 2008.
It’s card for people who have not voted since 2008!
Jagdeo is correct. You don’t need a card to vote! Cards are issued from age 14 for reasons apart from voting! You can also use your passport or driver’s lic as ID to vote! So you cannot just delete names because they don’t pick up cards! This is electoral fraud!
You PNCites trying ever trick to suppress voters! I don’t care who wins, but it must be free!
Did i ask a question or made a comment ? regarding the ID Cards not uplifted since 2008.
How do you know these people haven't voted or migrated ?

Yea, you commented! How you think I knew you were tuned in?

Anyway, That’s not for you to guess or judge. What if the live there and decide to go vote this time?

10/31/198:31 PM

BasemanSenior Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
If their names are not on the voters list, are they going to still be able to vote?
How will they vote when their names are not on the list. The voters list is padded , recommendations was made for H2H. Well we all know what played out to avoid the H2H.

The H2H was illegal! To prevent illegal voting, implement controls at the polling station. Why do things to cast doubt on the validity of the outcome! The PNC is strong, they stand a good chance without hanky-panky!

10/31/198:35 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
kp posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
kp posted:
TKS. she is the one that said the need for voter ID card to cast a vote is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. so look what she is saying today, she get bought.
Justice Claudette Singh , haven't changed from her ruling . Seems you are listening to the spinners.
Under her watch are names of people who have not uplifted their ID cards going to be removed from the voters list or not?
The ID cards in question were issued in 2008, the amount are 25,000 . Those who don't uplift their cards , the names will be struct out from the Voters List not the NRL.
Attached is the Law.
If their names are not on the voters list, are they going to still be able to vote?
You can be a born Guyanese live your entire life in Guyana and if your name is not on the list you can't vote.
But you can come from Haiti and get registered by rhe PNC you can vote.
Voting is the counting of the ballots one by one that every eligible voter cast.
How come they aren't found and objections made to their names on the voters list ?

Attachments

Hide

Images (1)

10/31/198:56 PM

DjangoAdmin

ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?

Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.

Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .

10/31/199:12 PM

DjangoAdmin

Baseman posted:
The H2H was illegal! To prevent illegal voting, implement controls at the polling station. Why do things to cast doubt on the validity of the outcome!
The PNC is strong, they stand a good chance without hanky-panky!

H2H Registration isn't illegal !!! regarding your last statement that should be the Coalition of Political Parties , yes they are strong and don't need no rigging.

10/31/199:13 PM

cainTired old hippie

BJ told dem peeps fo not take part in anything, is he fault when things go wrong. He does talk too dam much.

10/31/199:18 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity to your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .

I am more interested in Witch's ruling after the 1997 elections regarding ID cards and voting and her apparent position now. There is no ambiguity to her ruling then.

10/31/199:21 PM

BasemanSenior Member

Django posted:
Baseman posted:
The H2H was illegal! To prevent illegal voting, implement controls at the polling station. Why do things to cast doubt on the validity of the outcome!
The PNC is strong, they stand a good chance without hanky-panky!
H2H Registration isn't illegal !!! regarding your last statement that should be the Coalition of Political Parties , yes they are strong and don't need no rigging.

If the PNC not strong, Coalition down the sewer! Pig with lipstick, still a pig!

10/31/199:24 PM

Former Member

cain posted:
BJ told dem peeps fo not take part in anything, is he fault when things go wrong. He does talk too dam much.

Bai, in the end, even GECOM abandoned that H2H nonsense. They came around to Jagdeo's argument.

10/31/199:24 PM

DjangoAdmin

ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity to your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
I am more interested in Witch's ruling after the 1997 elections regarding ID cards and voting and her apparent position now.
There is no ambiguity to her ruling then.

The "ambiguity" is referenced to your statement about H2HR.

10/31/199:25 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity to your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
I am more interested in Witch's ruling after the 1997 elections regarding ID cards and voting and her apparent position now.
There is no ambiguity to her ruling then.
The "ambiguity" is referenced to your statement about H2HR.

H2H is history now bai. Even GECOM abandoned it.

The matter at hand now is if Witch will clarify the issue regarding the need for ID cards to vote in light of her ruling regarding the 1997 elections.

10/31/199:31 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .

What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?

10/31/199:35 PM

DjangoAdmin

ksazma posted:

The matter at hand now is if Witch will clarify the issue regarding the need for ID cards to vote in light of her ruling regarding the 1997 elections.

There is no disagreement about ID's that can be presented to vote.

The contention is the names of 25,000 ID Cards since 2008 not uplifted, will be removed from the voters list , those who uplift theirs, their names will be on the voters list.

10/31/199:41 PM

BasemanSenior Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:

The matter at hand now is if Witch will clarify the issue regarding the need for ID cards to vote in light of her ruling regarding the 1997 elections.
There is no disagreement about ID's that can be presented to vote.
The contention is the names of 25,000 ID Cards since 2008 not uplifted, will be removed from the voters list , those who uplift theirs, their names will be on the voters list.

And that's illegal! And you are misstating the facts. Its not cards not uplifted since 2008. It ID cards issued for persons who did not vote since 2008! You cannot assume their situation and delete their names!

10/31/199:45 PM

DjangoAdmin

Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?

You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?

It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.

10/31/199:45 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:

The matter at hand now is if Witch will clarify the issue regarding the need for ID cards to vote in light of her ruling regarding the 1997 elections.
There is no disagreement about ID's that can be presented to vote.
The contention is the names of 25,000 ID Cards since 2008 not uplifted, will be removed from the voters list , those who uplift theirs, their names will be on the voters list.

Names cannot be removed from the voters list because someone didn't pick up their ID card because when that person turns up to vote and their name is not on the list Witch will have to explain why she allowed that abomination to take place in light of her earlier ruling. She can't say she doesn't know what anyone is talking about.

This ID argument only became a focal point after Roxanne George ruled that names on the list cannot removed unless certain legal criteria is satisfied.

10/31/199:47 PM

BasemanSenior Member

Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?
You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?
It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.

Don't matter, you cannot delete their names! Plain and simple!

10/31/199:47 PM

DjangoAdmin

Baseman posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

The matter at hand now is if Witch will clarify the issue regarding the need for ID cards to vote in light of her ruling regarding the 1997 elections.
There is no disagreement about ID's that can be presented to vote.
The contention is the names of 25,000 ID Cards since 2008 not uplifted, will be removed from the voters list , those who uplift theirs, their names will be on the voters list.
And that's illegal! And you are misstating the facts. Its not cards not uplifted since 2008.
It ID cards issued for persons who did not vote since 2008!
You cannot assume their situation and delete their names!

How the heck they determine that ? you don't make sense.

10/31/199:49 PM

Former Member

Baseman posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?
You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?
It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.
Don't matter, you cannot delete their names! Plain and simple!

Except that the PNC dominated Coalition has tried one illegal move after the other to delay and deny the citizens of Guyana their right to elect their representatives.

10/31/199:50 PM

DjangoAdmin

Baseman posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?
You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?
It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.
Don't matter, you cannot delete their names! Plain and simple!

You holding on to rotten rope.

10/31/199:50 PM

BasemanSenior Member

ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

The matter at hand now is if Witch will clarify the issue regarding the need for ID cards to vote in light of her ruling regarding the 1997 elections.
There is no disagreement about ID's that can be presented to vote.
The contention is the names of 25,000 ID Cards since 2008 not uplifted, will be removed from the voters list , those who uplift theirs, their names will be on the voters list.
Names cannot be removed from the voters list because someone didn't pick up their ID card because when that person turns up to vote and their name is not on the list Witch will have to explain why she allowed that abomination to take place in light of her earlier ruling. She can't say she doesn't know what anyone is talking about.
This ID argument only became a focal point after Roxanne George ruled that names on the list cannot removed unless certain legal criteria is satisfied.

Bai, you laang winded! See my response! Shart and sweet!!

10/31/199:50 PM

BasemanSenior Member

Django posted:
Baseman posted:
Django posted:
You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?
It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.
Don't matter, you cannot delete their names! Plain and simple!
You holding on to rotten rope.

Hehehe...

10/31/199:52 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
Baseman posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?
You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?
It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.
Don't matter, you cannot delete their names! Plain and simple!
You holding on to rotten rope.

Actually, it is the PNC dominated Coalition's rope that is rotten. Just consider that every single last legal argument that they have made to every single last real court was knocked down by those courts. They only found some cover from the crooked judges in Guyana.

10/31/199:54 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:

The matter at hand now is if Witch will clarify the issue regarding the need for ID cards to vote in light of her ruling regarding the 1997 elections.
There is no disagreement about ID's that can be presented to vote.
The contention is the names of 25,000 ID Cards since 2008 not uplifted, will be removed from the voters list , those who uplift theirs, their names will be on the voters list.

Dr Django, like you over turning the CJ ruling back in August that says names cannot be removed from the list.

She further stated that only deceased persons and those otherwise disqualified under Article 159 (2), (3), or (4) are to be removed.
Pointing out that the “right to vote and the right to be registered to vote are sacrosanct”, the High Court Judge said “residence requirements from citizens

10/31/199:55 PM

DjangoAdmin

Dave posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

The matter at hand now is if Witch will clarify the issue regarding the need for ID cards to vote in light of her ruling regarding the 1997 elections.
There is no disagreement about ID's that can be presented to vote.
The contention is the names of 25,000 ID Cards since 2008 not uplifted, will be removed from the voters list , those who uplift theirs, their names will be on the voters list.
Dr Django, like you over turning the CJ ruling back in August that says names cannot be removed from the list.
She further stated that only deceased persons and those otherwise disqualified under Article 159 (2), (3), or (4) are to be removed.
Pointing out that the “right to vote and the right to be registered to vote are sacrosanct”, the High Court Judge said “residence requirements from citizens

I am not overturning the CJ ruling. Perhaps most of 25,000 persons are either deceased or migrated.

10/31/1910:09 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?
You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?
It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.

No. Why can’t they mail it to their residence and have them sign as receiving it. That is one form of accommodating them. Are you suggesting that there isn no mail service in Guyana anymore?

10/31/1910:12 PM

Former Member

The political parties need to encourage their supporters to uplift their cards.

PPP used to provide FREE transportation to their supporters in these situations.

10/31/1910:14 PM

Former Member

Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?
You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?
It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.
No. Why can’t they mail it to their residence and have them sign as receiving it. That is one form of accommodating them. Are you suggesting that there isn no mail service in Guyana anymore?

Did they deliver any during the H2H registration.. don’t think so.

That was a perfect opportunity to deliver them.

10/31/1910:17 PM

Former Member

Guyana is a backward ass place. They printing ID cards for people when they can't give them to their holders. They should print the damn card and hand it out the same time.

10/31/1910:39 PM

cainTired old hippie

Jus mention there is a $50US with each card picked up by the owners, see how many would show up, some, twice..taraaasss.

10/31/1911:01 PM

DjangoAdmin

Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

Exactly. So if this witch ruled not so long ago that an entire elections was invalid because ONE person couldn't vote because they did not have an ID, how can she argue now that someone cannot vote if they do not have an ID?
H2H became unnecessary after continuous registration became the law.
The only thing that played out regarding H2H was one of the Coalition's attempt to delay the elections. Outside of a waste of time and money, how did that H2H went?
Do two things , check when Continuous Registration becomes the Law and when was the last H2H Registration , info should be on line. There may be ambiguity in your statement.
Regarding the 25,000 ID Cards not uplifted since 2008 , those individuals residing in Guyana should pick theirs up .
What if they can’t afford the costs to travel to uplift it?
You mean since 2008 , they still can't afford the cost ?
It's over ten years. Those ID cards was generated from data, taken from the 2008 H2H Registration.
No. Why can’t they mail it to their residence and have them sign as receiving it. That is one form of accommodating them. Are you suggesting that there isn no mail service in Guyana anymore?

Do you get your ID or document used for identification purposes [not passport ] in the mail in Canada ? Is it a requirement to have an ID ?

Does everything have to be backward in Guyana, each Region have registration offices.

10/31/1911:16 PM

DjangoAdmin

Here is a GY Registration Training Manual , see attachment ayuh read um

Attachments

Hide

Files (1)

Registration_training_manual_gy.pdf

10/31/1911:28 PM

Vish MSenior Member

Is she in charge or is she just naive

11/1/1912:05 AM

TolaSenior Member

GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.

Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.

Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.

11/1/1912:54 AM

Former Member

Vish M posted:
Is she in charge or is she just naive

She seems to be following PNC orders.

11/1/197:27 AM

Former Member

Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.

Jagdeo 'nominated' her because it was the only way he can keep Granger from delaying the elections further. Plus she was the least toxic of all the people who Granger indicated he would appoint. Imagine that she is the least toxic. What does that say about the others that Granger indicated he would support.

11/1/197:31 AM

Former Member

Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
No. Why can’t they mail it to their residence and have them sign as receiving it. That is one form of accommodating them. Are you suggesting that there isn no mail service in Guyana anymore?
Do you get your ID or document used for identification purposes [not passport ] in the mail in Canada ? Is it a requirement to have an ID ?
Does everything have to be backward in Guyana, each Region have registration offices.

That is why they shouldn't have even printed the ID cards in the first place. Who prints ID cards for people when those people are not even around to verify that they are the right person?

11/1/197:33 AM

DjangoAdmin

Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points
as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.

Tola , from what i have gathered , there are Registration Offices in each Region.

11/1/198:35 AM

TolaSenior Member

Django posted:
Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points
as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.
Tola , from what i have gathered , there are Registration Offices in each Region.

Django, if the ID cards are at these regional offices, it is the responsibility of the voters to pick them up.

The laziness of some Guyanese shows, when we freely take pictures of their family and make prints overseas. But when we call them for pickup, just a short distanced away in Guyana, most say ' Bring am abee house na'.

11/1/199:57 AM

TolaSenior Member

ksazma posted:
Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.
Jagdeo 'nominated' her because it was the only way he can keep Granger from delaying the elections further. Plus she was the least toxic of all the people who Granger indicated he would appoint. Imagine that she is the least toxic. What does that say about the others that Granger indicated he would support.

For whatever reason, Jagdeo or anyone else makes a nomination, they must accept responsibility for that nomination and criticism cannot be placed on others for their decision.

11/1/1910:21 AM

Former Member

Django posted:
Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points
as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.
Tola , from what i have gathered , there are Registration Offices in each Region.

Please let us know the pick up location/address in each Regional Office where people can go to pick up theirs. I notice that GECOM did not provide this information to people or at least put the location/addresses of the Regional offices in the newspapers so that people are aware.

11/1/1912:15 PM

DjangoAdmin

Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points
as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.
Tola , from what i have gathered , there are Registration Offices in each Region.
Please let us know the pick up location/address in each Regional Office where people can go to pick up theirs.
I notice that GECOM did not provide this information to people or at least put the location/addresses of the Regional offices in the newspapers so that people are aware.

Permanent Offices and Temporary Offices

https://www.gecom.org.gy/home/locations

All information about GECOM

https://www.gecom.org.gy/

There is no excuse for people not picking up their ID.

11/1/191:14 PM

Former Member

Tola posted:
ksazma posted:
Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.
Jagdeo 'nominated' her because it was the only way he can keep Granger from delaying the elections further. Plus she was the least toxic of all the people who Granger indicated he would appoint. Imagine that she is the least toxic. What does that say about the others that Granger indicated he would support.
For whatever reason, Jagdeo or anyone else makes a nomination, they must accept responsibility for that nomination and criticism cannot be placed on others for their decision.

Who is saying that one should not take responsibility for their actions? You were just being corrected on your statement that Jagdeo nominated her when you know fully well that Granger suggested her and Jagdeo went through the nomination process just to keep the wheel turning. She was not any of his original nominations over a three submissions process.

Now that you have been duly corrected, you should take your own advise and accept responsibility for your misleading comment.

11/1/193:53 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points
as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.
Tola , from what i have gathered , there are Registration Offices in each Region.
Please let us know the pick up location/address in each Regional Office where people can go to pick up theirs.
I notice that GECOM did not provide this information to people or at least put the location/addresses of the Regional offices in the newspapers so that people are aware.
Permanent Offices and Temporary Offices
https://www.gecom.org.gy/home/locations
All information about GECOM
https://www.gecom.org.gy/
There is no excuse for people not picking up their ID.

Thank you for the info, however, these permanent and/temporary offices are used for claims and objections purposes. No where does it state that people can pick up their ID cards. Please point me to where it says so.

11/1/195:26 PM

DjangoAdmin

Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points
as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.
Tola , from what i have gathered , there are Registration Offices in each Region.
Please let us know the pick up location/address in each Regional Office where people can go to pick up theirs.
I notice that GECOM did not provide this information to people or at least put the location/addresses of the Regional offices in the newspapers so that people are aware.
Permanent Offices and Temporary Offices
https://www.gecom.org.gy/home/locations
All information about GECOM
https://www.gecom.org.gy/
There is no excuse for people not picking up their ID.
Thank you for the info, however, these permanent and/temporary offices are used for claims and objections purposes.
No where does it state that people can pick up their ID cards. Please point me to where it says so.

What do you think the permanent offices are there for ? it's stated in the registration laws. Do you think ID cards are only uplifted at head office ?

Temporary offices are created during election time.

Did you check out the voters list and election results that are posted.There are more details of voting at every polling stations in the 2015 election results. I downloaded and convert to spread sheet for stats purposes.

here is link https://www.gecom.org.gy/archived/archive.html

11/1/195:58 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Dondadda posted:
Django posted:
Tola posted:
GPO is not the most reliable place to mail ID cards or anything else. Too many sticky fingers.
Why don't GECOM decentralize the cards pickup points
as the government do with passport applications. No one in their right mind would travel from Skeldon or Charity to pickup their card in GT. When they have difficulty finding funds to even see a doctor in GT.
Also, it is not fair to criticize the GECOM chairperson for making decisions. Because, after all the challenges to find a new chairperson, Jagdeo nominated her. A method should be used to replace her, if the PPP feels she is not serving their purpose. No confidence motions seems to be a popular thing in Guyana, but it might be easier to mate elephants at the GT zoo.
Tola , from what i have gathered , there are Registration Offices in each Region.
Please let us know the pick up location/address in each Regional Office where people can go to pick up theirs.
I notice that GECOM did not provide this information to people or at least put the location/addresses of the Regional offices in the newspapers so that people are aware.
Permanent Offices and Temporary Offices
https://www.gecom.org.gy/home/locations
All information about GECOM
https://www.gecom.org.gy/
There is no excuse for people not picking up their ID.
Thank you for the info, however, these permanent and/temporary offices are used for claims and objections purposes.
No where does it state that people can pick up their ID cards. Please point me to where it says so.
What do you think the permanent offices are there for ? it's stated in the registration laws. Do you think ID cards are only uplifted at head office ?
Temporary offices are created during election time.
Did you check out the voters list and election results that are posted.There are more details of voting at every polling stations in the 2015 election results. I downloaded and convert to spread sheet for stats purposes.
here is link https://www.gecom.org.gy/archived/archive.html

I still have not seen anywhere that the ID cards are at the Permanent/temporary offices and available for pick up. As well, a lot has changed since 2015 by GECOM, for example they are not consistent with their messaging and are confusing the people out there that most have given up and don’t know what to believe of GECOM.

11/2/1912:44 PM

DjangoAdmin

Dondadda posted:

I still have not seen anywhere that the ID cards are at the Permanent/temporary offices and available for pick up.
As well, a lot has changed since 2015 by GECOM, for example they are not consistent with their messaging and are confusing the people out there that most have given up and don’t know what to believe of GECOM.

It's the duty of every citizen of Guyana to get an ID Card , when the required age is reached. Also it's their duty to make sure their names are on the voters list.

Some of the politicians are misleading the people.

11/2/1912:55 PM

Former Member

ID card isn’t required to vote so citizen need not waste time if they don’t want it.

11/2/191:21 PM

DjangoAdmin

ksazma posted:
ID card isn’t required to vote so citizen need not waste time if they don’t want it.

When conducting business, an ID required , what will they produce ?

Do you know about this in the US ? https://www.dhs.gov/real-id-public-faqs

11/2/191:47 PM

Former Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
ID card isn’t required to vote so citizen need not waste time if they don’t want it.
When conducting business, an ID required , what will they produce ?
Do you know about this in the US ? https://www.dhs.gov/real-id-public-faqs

I never had an ID card in America because I got my DL shortly after moving here. As FK stated, other forms of ID is sufficient for identification. Therefore GECOM is overreaching by removing names from the voters list just on account of those ID cards. It will be mayhem on elections day when people can’t vote. Unless GECOM knows for sure that all those names are not PNC voters. You know how PNC voters does get on bad on elections day.

11/2/192:02 PM

kpHonorary Member

Django posted:
ksazma posted:
ID card isn’t required to vote so citizen need not waste time if they don’t want it.
When conducting business, an ID required , what will they produce ?
Do you know about this in the US ? https://www.dhs.gov/real-id-public-faqs

In Guyana there are several forms of ID, passports, birth certificates, NIS card, Income tax statement a utility bill, driver licence, failing to produce any of the above only then a voter ID card will be issued. But, the PNC is handing out this ID card in the same manner they sell PNC card. I recently voted on Canada, I showed my driver licence to vote.

Remember they stopped the H2H registration before everyone was registered, so what happened to those that did not get registered?? The H2H was done mainly in the PNC areas and completed, where as some was started in the Indos areas ,then stopped. This is voter restriction and control.

11/2/192:37 PM

Former Member

kp posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
ID card isn’t required to vote so citizen need not waste time if they don’t want it.
When conducting business, an ID required , what will they produce ?
Do you know about this in the US ? https://www.dhs.gov/real-id-public-faqs
In Guyana there are several forms of ID, passports, birth certificates, NIS card, Income tax statement a utility bill, driver licence, failing to produce any of the above only then a voter ID card will be issued. But, the PNC is handing out this ID card in the same manner they sell PNC card. I recently voted on Canada, I showed my driver licence to vote.
Remember they stopped the H2H registration before everyone was registered, so what happened to those that did not get registered?? The H2H was done mainly in the PNC areas and completed, where as some was started in the Indos areas ,then stopped. This is voter restriction and control.

Bai, that is how PNC does roll. Incompetence tarass.

11/2/195:34 PM

Skip to main content

Topics

Attachments

Attachments

She further stated that only deceased persons and those otherwise disqualified under Article 159 (2), (3), or (4) are to be removed.Pointing out that the “right to vote and the right to be registered to vote are sacrosanct”, the High Court Judge said “residence requirements from citizens

She further stated that only deceased persons and those otherwise disqualified under Article 159 (2), (3), or (4) are to be removed.Pointing out that the “right to vote and the right to be registered to vote are sacrosanct”, the High Court Judge said “residence requirements from citizens

Attachments

Add Reply

Membership Required

Remove From Your Block List

Manage Follow Preferences

Block

Premium Membership Required

GNI VIP Member

Please wait...

She further stated that only deceased persons and those otherwise disqualified under Article 159 (2), (3), or (4) are to be removed.
Pointing out that the “right to vote and the right to be registered to vote are sacrosanct”, the High Court Judge said “residence requirements from citizens

She further stated that only deceased persons and those otherwise disqualified under Article 159 (2), (3), or (4) are to be removed.
Pointing out that the “right to vote and the right to be registered to vote are sacrosanct”, the High Court Judge said “residence requirements from citizens