Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

France rejects asylum request from WikiLeaks' Assange

Agence France-Presse â€“ 2 hours 8 minutes ago, July 03, 2015, Source

 

Paris (AFP) - The French government rejected an asylum request from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Friday, saying he did not face "immediate danger".

 

"France cannot act on his request," said the office of President Francois Hollande in a statement, after Assange wrote an open letter to the government requesting asylum.

 

"The situation of Mr Assange does not present an immediate danger. Furthermore, he is subject to a European arrest warrant," Hollande's office said.

 

In his letter to the president, published earlier Friday in Le Monde newspaper, Assange described himself as a "journalist pursued and threatened with death by the United States' authorities as a result of my professional activities".

 

"I have never been formally charged with an offence or a common crime, anywhere in the world, including Sweden and the UK," wrote the Australian activist, who turned 44 on Friday.

 

He also raised the issue of US spying on French leaders, which caused controversy last week when WikiLeaks released documents indicating that the United States had wiretapped Hollande and his two predecessors.

 

"The scale of the scandal and the reactions that followed our latest revelations confirmed the legitimacy of our approach," he wrote.

"These revelations were made at the risk of our lives."

 

Assange has spent over three years holed up in the Ecuador embassy in London to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he faces allegations by two women, one of rape and one of sexual assault, which he denies.

 

The former computer hacker fears extradition to Sweden could lead to him being transferred to the United States to face trial over WikiLeaks' publication of classified US military and diplomatic documents.

 

In his letter to Hollande, Assange said he had not seen his youngest child or the child's mother -- both French -- for five years.

 

"I have had to keep their existence secret up to today in order to protect them," he wrote.

 

He claimed last month that Swedish prosecutors had cancelled a long-awaited interview regarding his case.

 

Prosecutors had long insisted that he travel to Sweden for questioning but in March they agreed to go to London because some of the alleged offences will reach their statute of limitations in August.

 

But at the last minute, the interview was cancelled on the grounds that the prosecutors had not received permission from Ecuador to enter its embassy.

 

A criminal investigation is ongoing in the US into WikiLeaks' release in 2010 of 500,000 classified military files on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and 250,000 diplomatic cables.

 

The main source of the leaks, US Army soldier Chelsea Manning, was sentenced to 35 years in prison for breaches of the Espionage Act.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

For a country that gave the world the slogan, "Liberty, equality, fraternity," that's a shame.

 

Assange, a real freedom fighter is actually serving a jail sentence by being in the Embassy.

 

People like Assange are the true guardians of democracy and bulwark against tyrannical government.

He needs to be in jail. He ultimately will get there

FM
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

From the reports, Julian Assange has broken a fundamental trust with his former place of employment by removing private and secure documents.

 

If indeed he was dissatisfied with what he became aware of through his employment, he should have resigned and move on to something else.

Come on. I expected a better response from you. What if he found things that were criminal in nature or morally reprehensible? I keep hearing the same kinds of arguments when immigrants oppose government policies in Canada And the U.S. It was the same in the UK.

Z
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

For a country that gave the world the slogan, "Liberty, equality, fraternity," that's a shame.

 

Assange, a real freedom fighter is actually serving a jail sentence by being in the Embassy.

 

People like Assange are the true guardians of democracy and bulwark against tyrannical government.

He needs to be in jail. He ultimately will get there

So you have tried and convicted him already. You might want to explain your verdict to us and the process you undertook to gather the evidence, hear a defence and making a decision.

Z
Originally Posted by Zed:
Originally Posted by Demerara_Guy:

From the reports, Julian Assange has broken a fundamental trust with his former place of employment by removing private and secure documents.

 

If indeed he was dissatisfied with what he became aware of through his employment, he should have resigned and move on to something else.

Come on. I expected a better response from you. What if he found things that were criminal in nature or morally reprehensible? I keep hearing the same kinds of arguments when immigrants oppose government policies in Canada And the U.S. It was the same in the UK.

Immaterial to the issues on the material of a sensitive nature.

 

He was indeed employed in the security services dealing with extremely sensitive material; something he knew quite well.

 

He has two choices ... remain employed there of seek other employment.

 

In either case, he absolutely has no right to secure information from his place of employment for the purposes of disseminating them here, there and everywhere..

FM
Originally Posted by Zed:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

For a country that gave the world the slogan, "Liberty, equality, fraternity," that's a shame.

 

Assange, a real freedom fighter is actually serving a jail sentence by being in the Embassy.

 

People like Assange are the true guardians of democracy and bulwark against tyrannical government.

He needs to be in jail. He ultimately will get there

So you have tried and convicted him already. You might want to explain your verdict to us and the process you undertook to gather the evidence, hear a defence and making a decision.

He stole government secrets...or rather he persuade a troubled soldier to hand him government secrets. There is a right to protest and a right to object etc but no right to steal information and place it in the public domain where it would be a detriment to the government. It left people in danger and made government positions with respect to other nations weak. He will be in jail and one does not have to be a lawyer to determine that. There is no way out in explaining away what he admits to...stealing government property.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Zed:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

For a country that gave the world the slogan, "Liberty, equality, fraternity," that's a shame.

 

Assange, a real freedom fighter is actually serving a jail sentence by being in the Embassy.

 

People like Assange are the true guardians of democracy and bulwark against tyrannical government.

He needs to be in jail. He ultimately will get there

So you have tried and convicted him already. You might want to explain your verdict to us and the process you undertook to gather the evidence, hear a defence and making a decision.

He stole government secrets...or rather he persuade a troubled soldier to hand him government secrets. There is a right to protest and a right to object etc but no right to steal information and place it in the public domain where it would be a detriment to the government. It left people in danger and made government positions with respect to other nations weak. He will be in jail and one does not have to be a lawyer to determine that. There is no way out in explaining away what he admits to...stealing government property.

DG and Stormborn, am I to understand that your position is that under no circumstance is someone to make devision of a high moral nature if they find someone for whom they work is committing wrongdoing?

Z

Can someone post a source that verified that he stole government documents. As far as I know, he is an Australian who released information given to him about the atrocities committed by the Americans in Afganistan, the Middle East, Guantanimo, etc and even against their allies. Obviously, the Americans want him because he exposed their misdeedsand there is the investigation regarding sexual activities.

Z

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×