ksazma posted:
 

Likewise it is time for the PNC to respect the law and commence elections as prescribed by law.

It is not any one person to decide who wins and who loses.

That is the right of the voters and sticking to their core nature, the PNC and their supporters are denying those voters their rights.

As soon as GECOM  is ready , Elections will be called [ my view]

Elections in Guyana are serious matter , it's not something to toy with , let GECOM do their gob and the voters will get their rights to cast their ballot for the Party of their choice.

ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

We don’t criticize the PNC because they are mostly black. We criticize them because they have a tendency to act in an uncivilized manner.

Why is it that only the PNC refuse to allow the people their right to vote? 

The attempt to remove an elected government in a fragile Democracy by the plotters, are more than a right to vote.

It happens all over the world without the nonsense that the PNC are currently involved in.

This same PNC tried to do the same thing to the Ramotar government so they suddenly can’t act like it can’t happen in Guyana.

Secondly, if Ramotar and the PPP had behaved even 10% as wicked as the Coalition is doing now, PNC and their supporters would have already burned Guyana to the ground.

It was time to get rid of the kleptocratic PPP , 23 yrs was enough , they behaved as they are rightful owners of the public purse. What makes you think the PPP are saints, they act in devious ways .

The same goes for the current gov't , no anchoring for long periods. The push should have been for a new Constitution , that document was written for one Party State.

Likewise it is time for the PNC to respect the law and commence elections as prescribed by law. It is not any one person to decide who wins and who loses. That is the right of the voters and sticking to their core nature, the PNC and their supporters are denying those voters their rights.

Correct, the voters put them in office, they will be the ones who decide whether they go or stay, not by the vote by a weasel who suddenly gets an epiphany after a deal was struck.

Last edited by cain
cain posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:

We don’t criticize the PNC because they are mostly black. We criticize them because they have a tendency to act in an uncivilized manner.

Why is it that only the PNC refuse to allow the people their right to vote? 

The attempt to remove an elected government in a fragile Democracy by the plotters, are more than a right to vote.

It happens all over the world without the nonsense that the PNC are currently involved in.

This same PNC tried to do the same thing to the Ramotar government so they suddenly can’t act like it can’t happen in Guyana.

Secondly, if Ramotar and the PPP had behaved even 10% as wicked as the Coalition is doing now, PNC and their supporters would have already burned Guyana to the ground.

It was time to get rid of the kleptocratic PPP , 23 yrs was enough , they behaved as they are rightful owners of the public purse. What makes you think the PPP are saints, they act in devious ways .

The same goes for the current gov't , no anchoring for long periods. The push should have been for a new Constitution , that document was written for one Party State.

Likewise it is time for the PNC to respect the law and commence elections as prescribed by law. It is not any one person to decide who wins and who loses. That is the right of the voters and sticking to their core nature, the PNC and their supporters are denying those voters their rights.

Correct, the voters put them in office, they will be the ones who decide whether they go or stay, not by the vote by a weasel who suddenly gets an epiphany after a deal was struck.

So since the voters didn’t vote for their police force they should not have to obey it either. The parliament has auxiliary powers and one of those was exercised by the NCV.

Patterson said that he is concerned about how the PPP know that the money was deposited into his account. Skelly’s question still stand on how the payer got Patterson’s banking information to make the deposit. Did they get it from Patterson? Did he deposit the funds into his account himself or did someone else did. How come he doesn’t seem concerned about how the payer got his banking information?

Who is ready to take a swipe at Dominic Gaskin Head.

AFC’s press conference yesterday, Dominic Gaskin, said that he would put his head on a block and bet that Patterson did not have the money deposited into his personal account.
But Patterson responded just a day after the post, that there is nothing wrong with what happened. He admitted that money was deposited into his bank account by China International Contractors Association,
Patterson said that the organisers committed to reimbursing travel-related expenses up to US$10,000. For this, he said that Cabinet permission was sought and received.
The trip was paid for by the Maritime Administration Department (MARAD), his statement said.
β€œI attended the conference and some time in 2017, a refund for my travels was processed and paid to me as the attendee.”

 

https://www.kaieteurnewsonline...of-his-bank-account/

ksazma posted:

Patterson said that he is concerned about how the PPP know that the money was deposited into his account. Skelly’s question still stand on how the payer got Patterson’s banking information to make the deposit. Did they get it from Patterson? Did he deposit the funds into his account himself or did someone else did. How come he doesn’t seem concerned about how the payer got his banking information?

This Bhai Django is willing to  put his head on a block for AFC/ APNU irrespective of the evidence of corruption. 

Add Reply

Post

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×