NOT EVEN A TOKEN- RACISM IN EVERYTHING PNC STYLE -First Lady opens ICT workshop for Region Three youths By Staff Reporter - July 11, 2018

GTAngler posted:
.

So we went from you complaining about Indians owning the majority of business in Guyana to Indians should hire more Afros regardless of qualification to I am enabling the Whites because I believe in hiring the best qualified candidate. And this makes me racist? Laughable. Keep blaming the world for your shortcomings. The rest of us will continue to work hard and make our lives a success.

I did NOT complain that the majority of businesses are owned by Indians. I stated it as a FACT.  Just as it is a FACT that the bulk of the public sector is dominated by blacks.

My contention is if the domination of the private sector by Indians gives Indians an excuse to exclude blacks, because they consider them to be unsuitable for no reason other than being black, then why scream if blacks do the same thing in the public sector. to Indians.  Yes they are then both committing the same sin of using ethnicity and not merit. 

But in your eyes its only wrong when the black person does it.  Then you scream that you are fair and balanced and talk with intelligence on race in Guyana.  I see that you must agree with Trump that white Americans are getting a raw deal because of all of these nonwhites who demand their due based upon a system of merit.

Its seems OK for Indians to exclude but not blacks.  It seems OK for Indians to scream racism when blacks exclude them but when blacks scream racism such behavior is co0nsidered racist. 

That it is perfectly logical in your world for an Indian to only hire Indians, and exclude any consideration of black professionals because the latter clearly must be incompetent and incapable. That to fair minded and balanced people is RACIST and it is a fact that YOU must be a racist if you cannot understand this FACT.

I have no doubt that there is bias going on here. My contention is that this bias as NO WORSE than that which goes on in the private sector.

If you wish to continue to be an anti black racist then continue to justify racism against blacks by the private sector but do NOT wail when blacks in the public sector retaliate.

I also have made note of your RACIST personal attack against me. This reveal lots in your little reptilian head. I am a loser because I am black. That is your thinking.

caribny posted:
GTAngler posted:
.

So we went from you complaining about Indians owning the majority of business in Guyana to Indians should hire more Afros regardless of qualification to I am enabling the Whites because I believe in hiring the best qualified candidate. And this makes me racist? Laughable. Keep blaming the world for your shortcomings. The rest of us will continue to work hard and make our lives a success.

I did NOT complain that the majority of businesses are owned by Indians. I stated it as a FACT.  Just as it is a FACT that the bulk of the public sector is dominated by blacks.

My contention is if the domination of the private sector by Indians gives Indians an excuse to exclude blacks, because they consider them to be unsuitable for no reason other than being black, then why scream if blacks do the same thing in the public sector. to Indians.  Yes they are then both committing the same sin of using ethnicity and not merit. 

But in your eyes its only wrong when the black person does it.  Then you scream that you are fair and balanced and talk with intelligence on race in Guyana.  I see that you must agree with Trump that white Americans are getting a raw deal because of all of these nonwhites who demand their due based upon a system of merit.

Its seems OK for Indians to exclude but not blacks.  It seems OK for Indians to scream racism when blacks exclude them but when blacks scream racism such behavior is co0nsidered racist. 

That it is perfectly logical in your world for an Indian to only hire Indians, and exclude any consideration of black professionals because the latter clearly must be incompetent and incapable. That to fair minded and balanced people is RACIST and it is a fact that YOU must be a racist if you cannot understand this FACT.

I have no doubt that there is bias going on here. My contention is that this bias as NO WORSE than that which goes on in the private sector.

If you wish to continue to be an anti black racist then continue to justify racism against blacks by the private sector but do NOT wail when blacks in the public sector retaliate.

I also have made note of your RACIST personal attack against me. This reveal lots in your little reptilian head. I am a loser because I am black. That is your thinking.

You are a loser because that's who and what you are. It has nothing to do with race. You use race as an excuse for your inadequacies. As I have said before, anyone who stands up for any ethnic group except Afro Guyanese is a racist. It that case, guilty as charged. I have never condoned or supported racism in any sector private or public but at the same time i do not support any sort of entitlement. My parents taught me to work for what I want not sit on my ass and find excuses. So continue with your nonsensical ranting and blaming. I feel sorry for you.

GTAngler posted:

 

anyone who stands up for any ethnic group except Afro Guyanese is a racist. It that case, guilty as charged.

Glad you admit it because you ALWAYS stand up for Indians, NEVER stand up for blacks and then you scream that those who do stand up for blacks are losers and racists.

Now its interesting that you accuse me of using race and yet your comments on this very forum queried the under representation of Indians. And it isn't the first time that you have done so either.

 Isn't that seeing it through the prism of race?  How come you decided that their "Indianness" explain their exclusion.

But carry on. Glad to see that you admit that you are a racist.

GTAngler posted:
 

Does anyone know how this works or what the criteria were? Was there an open application process then selection? I spent a lot of time on WCD and in Essequibo. This is NOT an accurate ethnic representation.

And here he sees it through the prism of race.  Why not accept your own assessment of blacks and admit in this case that the Indians weren't qualified.  No you will not do so, but you definitely will when blacks complain about under representation.

You are so steeped in your Indo centricity that you don't even see this for what it is.

GTAngler posted:
 Now if you really wanted to help the youths in an area AND wanted to be fair, would you not have made sure you reached out to all the schools or are you telling me that is an accurate depiction of the ethnic breakdown of youths in that region? .

Funny this.  You demand all of this outreach to attract Indians but if someone said that the same should be done to attract blacks in instances where there is under representation you scream that they are racist losers who can only see life through race.

You are definitely not using any criteria aside from ethnicity to assess this situation.  How do you know that the outreach wasn't done?

Add Reply

Likes (0)

×
×
×
×
×