The APNU+AFC on Thursday issued a plea for the Joint Services to vote for the Coalition. Over 10,000 members of the Army, Police and Prison and Fire Services are registered to vote on Friday.
The Disciplined Forces are voting ten days before the rest of the population as they will be working to ensure peace and order on March 02.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Looks very busy there
We GDF police vote coalition. Comrade Granger wit coalition win 36 all opposition on 29. Comrade Cuffy and comrade Burnham and comrade Granger all fite make freedom.
PNC will get 99% without even asking
Nehru posted:PNC will get 99% without even asking
Of course they will--you are on the ball.
When did they NOT get 99%?? I am not Einstein but who needs to??
Nehru posted:When did they NOT get 99%?? I am not Einstein but who needs to??
I believe in 1992 the PPP did comparatively well with the military.
Believing is always good
Nehru posted:Believing is always good
Why don't you check rather than acting like a fool.
You making the claim, prove it nah
Nehru posted:PNC will get 99% without even asking
Naaaahhhh bhai Nehru .... PNCR will get 499% of the votes.
Bibi Haniffa posted:
Who in the green shirt and khaki pants overseeing the voting.
Demerara_Guy posted:Bibi Haniffa posted:
Who in the green shirt and khaki pants overseeing the voting.
He is not overseeing the voting. As a candidate, he is entitled to visit polling stations.
Demerara_Guy posted:Bibi Haniffa posted:
Who in the green shirt and khaki pants overseeing the voting.
THE STINKING DICTATOR!!!
You are spot on, Nehru.
It is beginning to appear as if the opposition is preparing its supporters for defeat, which they will blame on rigging.
Totaram posted:Demerara_Guy posted:Bibi Haniffa posted:
Who in the green shirt and khaki pants overseeing the voting.
He is not overseeing the voting. As a candidate, he is entitled to visit polling stations.
In Canada, US_of_A, Britain, etc., candidates for elections DO Not visit pooling stations to monitor the election process.
Each candidate has representatives who are entitled to be present at the pooling stations and they are situated in a selected area where they can observe the process.
In Canada, US_of_A, Britain, etc., no representative is situated as that shown in the picture of the person in green shirt and khaki pants.
Demerara_Guy posted:Totaram posted:Demerara_Guy posted:Bibi Haniffa posted:
Who in the green shirt and khaki pants overseeing the voting.
He is not overseeing the voting. As a candidate, he is entitled to visit polling stations.
In Canada, US_of_A, Britain, etc., candidates for elections DO Not visit pooling stations to monitor the election process.
Each candidate has representatives who are entitled to be present at the pooling stations and they are situated in a selected area where they can observe the process.
In Canada, US_of_A, Britain, etc., no representative is situated as that shown in the picture of the person in green shirt and khaki pants.
Tell me something I don't know. If you look at the video of Granger's visit to the polling station you would know that there were dozens of reporters and election observers present. A reporter asked him about the propriety of him wearing the green shirt etc. Now go and watch the video for the rest.
Totaram posted:Demerara_Guy posted:Totaram posted:Demerara_Guy posted:Bibi Haniffa posted:
Who in the green shirt and khaki pants overseeing the voting.
He is not overseeing the voting. As a candidate, he is entitled to visit polling stations.
In Canada, US_of_A, Britain, etc., candidates for elections DO Not visit pooling stations to monitor the election process.
Each candidate has representatives who are entitled to be present at the pooling stations and they are situated in a selected area where they can observe the process.
In Canada, US_of_A, Britain, etc., no representative is situated as that shown in the picture of the person in green shirt and khaki pants.
Tell me something I don't know. If you look at the video of Granger's visit to the polling station you would know that there were dozens of reporters and election observers present. A reporter asked him about the propriety of him wearing the green shirt etc. Now go and watch the video for the rest.
Immaterial, he has no right to be present in front of the table and agent where people are voting.
It is perfectly in order if he is making a visit without people at the table to cast their votes.
It will then be considered acceptable as a presidential candidate making a courtesy visit.
Access to this requires a premium membership.