Skip to main content

TV announcers, players, managers and media in general have to be diplomatic but I do not have to be. 

 

I was at the stadium today and it was a horribly called game with the Jays getting the shaft. When you know baseball you can sit anywhere in the stadium and tell weather a game was well called, badly called or a team was getting squeezed and the Jays pitchers got squeezed big time today.

FM

I did not want to watch but ended up watching anyways  (like I could have stayed away), Estrada was amazing and Tullo's home run was welcomed, did you see how many double plays they hit into? And yesterday home runs was how I know the Jays to be, did not like how RA was pulled for Price and much as I admired him in the regular season, he did not shine yet in the post season. I am so happy that they tied it up and bring it back to TO. Stoman is on tomorrow and I hope he wins, he's been great since he came bk.

FM
Originally Posted by politikalamity:

There is no "I: in team...check Dicky's numbers against Shin-Soo Choo. I think he already had two hits in the game and it was only 4 innings old...Jays lose they go home..win they get to come home and close out... 

 

Playoffs more that anytime in the season is all about match-ups. 

So, how come he didn't take Price out right after he gave up a run...the "I" in team only meant for RA?

Seems he does not like RA....not allowing a pitcher to get an out with a 7 - 1 lead is assinine...I could understand with a small lead, but yuh leading by 6 runs!

This also meant he was not planning on Price pitching in Game 5

 

FM
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:
Originally Posted by politikalamity:

There is no "I: in team...check Dicky's numbers against Shin-Soo Choo. I think he already had two hits in the game and it was only 4 innings old...Jays lose they go home..win they get to come home and close out... 

 

Playoffs more that anytime in the season is all about match-ups. 

So, how come he didn't take Price out right after he gave up a run...the "I" in team only meant for RA?

Seems he does not like RA....not allowing a pitcher to get an out with a 7 - 1 lead is assinine...I could understand with a small lead, but yuh leading by 6 runs!

This also meant he was not planning on Price pitching in Game 5

 

Through all of this, we got a guy who throws over 100MPH and with accuracy for R.A. so all is good.

 

Harvey struggled last night but let him finish the 5th. That was R.A.'s win. Price had his chance in game 1 and blew it.

FM
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:
 

So, how come he didn't take Price out right after he gave up a run...the "I" in team only meant for RA?

Seems he does not like RA....not allowing a pitcher to get an out with a 7 - 1 lead is assinine...I could understand with a small lead, but yuh leading by 6 runs!

This also meant he was not planning on Price pitching in Game 5

 

the most important thing is that the Jays won...everything else is irrelevant.

 

A manager manages to win and he won and now he is being criticized...this kinds of decisions have been made forever in the MLB post season ..

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Through all of this, we got a guy who throws over 100MPH and with accuracy for R.A. so all is good.

 

Harvey struggled last night but let him finish the 5th. That was R.A.'s win. Price had his chance in game 1 and blew it.

it was a good trade for the Mets, however, if the Jays win the world series then it is an even deal..

 

FM
Originally Posted by politikalamity:
Originally Posted by ksazma:

Through all of this, we got a guy who throws over 100MPH and with accuracy for R.A. so all is good.

 

Harvey struggled last night but let him finish the 5th. That was R.A.'s win. Price had his chance in game 1 and blew it.

it was a good trade for the Mets, however, if the Jays win the world series then it is an even deal..

 

I don't disagree. Meanwhile the Mets not doing it tonight.

FM
Originally Posted by politikalamity:
Originally Posted by RiffRaff:
 

So, how come he didn't take Price out right after he gave up a run...the "I" in team only meant for RA?

Seems he does not like RA....not allowing a pitcher to get an out with a 7 - 1 lead is assinine...I could understand with a small lead, but yuh leading by 6 runs!

This also meant he was not planning on Price pitching in Game 5

 

the most important thing is that the Jays won...everything else is irrelevant.

 

A manager manages to win and he won and now he is being criticized...this kinds of decisions have been made forever in the MLB post season ..

For the sake of argument, find me a post season game where a pltcher had a similar lead and was taken out before he was allowed to be eligible for the win?

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×