Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

If the LGE don't mean squat why is your beloved leader, David Granger and his party bigwigs are using the result to twist the AFC's arm into accepting that they have little electoral value based on the 4% they won at the local elections?

Django, you are a tenacious but poor defender of the PNC.  

Read the continuation of my  former post.

Very poor of you. Come up with something factual. 

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Django posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

 

Blacks make up no more than 30% of the population and the party they support (PNC) has never won more than 42% of the popular votes in a free election. Indians still  make over 40% of the population and the party they support has won over 55% in most of the elections contested since colonial times. 

As for population dwindling that applies to both Indians and Africans and less so for the Amerindians who now make up a solid 10 - 12% of the population and vote mostly for the PPP (About 80%). 

Django is ignoring real facts such as the AFC's 10% of the popular won in 2011 and 2015 came from PPP Indians.  They voted the same way in two elections (2011 and 2015) but not so in the 2018 local government elections.

  The racism from the Granger government and its failures in reducing crime, increasing wages, and growing the economy has led to deep discontent amongst the population.  This discontent was reflected in the local government elections which showed a significant decreased of support of the AFC (4%) and the APNU or PNC (36%).  The PPP ran away with 60% of the votes.

Django,  why don't you give an explanation why the government's support has dwindled and the dominant partner (PNC) in the coalition has stated clearly that the AFC has little electoral value and should therefore be given less ministerial positions and parliamentary seats?

 

Banna get with the times ,and source some real data , East Indians are not over 40% of the population.

LGE don't mean squat comparable to General and Regional Elections

Your facts are not real since they are sourced from propaganda literatures coming out of Congress Place. I don't give credence to anything coming out of that place. 

Your daily attempt to paint a great image of the PNC on this forum has been utterly pathethic and laughable.

Another hogwash statement , all legitimate documents can be found on line , use your skills you will find them.

Regarding your last statement , i am stating what are factual from my own analysis. I am not painting any rosy picture of Political Parties. I am aware what i am saying is not good for some ears , so they come up with all the bullcrap of being ..paid ,taking orders and supporting.

Your analyses don't invite any criticism from the PNC posters on GNI. That's says a whole lot. 

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Your analyses don't invite any criticism from the PNC posters on GNI. That's says a whole lot. 

Good for you Billy, you give Djanjo and Vish ( supporters / defender of a terrorist political party) belly wok tonight. 

Vote PPP/C For A Better Tomorrow. 

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Your analyses don't invite any criticism from the PNC posters on GNI.

That's says a whole lot. 

How many are here on GNI ?

Dave posted:

Billy Ram Balgobin posted:

Your analyses don't invite any criticism from the PNC posters on GNI. That's says a whole lot. 

Good for you Billy, you give Djanjo and Vish ( supporters / defender of a terrorist political party) belly wok tonight.

Vote PPP/C For A Better Tomorrow. 

LOL

That banna weak...dried up pumpkin vine stronger than him, just kidding !! me thinks he is a good fella , only problem seems like a full blown PPP-ite.

@Django. Re: my mention of Nandlall vis a vis Dr Irfaan Ali. I was jesting.

There's absolutely no need to replace Dr Ali as the PPP/C presidential candidate. You and your coalition confederates want to make Dr Ali's academic background an elections issue. The PPP/C is making the welfare of the entire nation its foremost elections issue. This is why the party is inviting and encouraging ANYONE & EVERYONE to read and discuss the PPP/C plans as set out in its manifesto. 

Let me be clear, Django. Dr Irfaan Ali alone is not the PPP/C. He alone didn't create the party manifesto. That important document is the result of months of consultations with the party's members and others. The crafting and drafting of the manifesto was done seriously and diligently by a competent team of party members. The PPP/C in government would not depend on Dr Ali alone to implement its multifaceted manifesto programs à la Hercules. All government ministers and lower-level personnel will be tasked. 

Those who want to divert the electorate towards Dr Ali's certificates will fail.

It seems like Django has taken an oath to assail Indians wherever possible. He has now began referring to the PPP as ‘the Indian Party’ rather than the progressive party which has been it’s objective since it’s creation many decades ago.

Presidential candidate Ali is trying to reach out to all Guyanese because that is how a broad based party operates.