Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Rev:

     


* Lordy! Lordy! It looks like the Rev has landed in hot waters with the ladies on GNI for calling SRK short and ugly.

 

* Arrite! Arrite! Lemme make some amends---I read Anjali's comments about SRK being a man of charisma and talent---I guess women are attracted to and and put a big value on men like Sharukh Khan who make them smile, make them laugh, and make the feel good about themselves---Guess once a man projects enthusiasm and sex appeal---he's got it made with the smarter sex.

 

* Thank god for the way women think--even a frog can magically become a prince if he has talent, intelligence, charisma, and a sense of humor.hahaha

 

Rev

I'm glad you come to your senses

 

It's not always about looks.  I agreed he is not your classic handsome man, SRK is considered as ruggedly handsome in my books. He's charismatic, dynamic and have just the right appeal to make him a dashing man

 

Another example - I wouldn't consider Daniel Craig as a handsome man but he is super attractive and makes me swoon

FM
Originally Posted by Riya:
 

I'm glad you come to your senses

 

ha ha ha ha ha

 

riya:

 

* I told you I have a good teacher at home---yuh know how much time that woman slap some sense into my hard head---but I catch sense quick---I always learn.haha

 

* You mentioned some other stuff---I'll comment later---tad busy.

 

Rev

FM
Originally Posted by Riya:
 

 

 

It's not always about looks.  I agreed he is not your classic handsome man, SRK is considered as ruggedly handsome in my books. He's charismatic, dynamic and have just the right appeal to make him a dashing man

 

Another example - I wouldn't consider Daniel Craig as a handsome man but he is super attractive and makes me swoon

 

       

 

Nurse Riya:

 

* You mentioned "your books", where can I buy copies I'd love to read them---you strike the Rev as a very knowledgeable and  interesting woman. 

 

* Anyway, Thanks for sharing with the forum the kinds of men who get your juices/hormones/dopamine flowing.

 

* By the way riya, did you know studies have shown that "there is a shift in male preference by women during their menstrual cycle---and most women are attracted to men with masculine bodies during ovulation but do not desire them as long term partners---I guess when the ovulation ceases that's when "super attractive" men like the man who makes you "swoon",Daniel Craig,  stimulate the female hormones---but during ovulation---the masculine breed gets the "juices" flowing.

 

* Good lord women are complex.

 

* Anyway, Is there any truth in that study nurse riya ?

 

Rev

 

FM
Originally Posted by Riya:

My books are Mills and Boon and Harlequin Romance

 

riya's fantasy Jason Statham

 

I can prove that study wrong. I'm attracted to Daniel Craig, Jason Statham and SRK 365 days!


* Well riya, you were surely right when you said you liked your men "ruggedly handsome."hahaha

 

* Those romance Mills and Boon fiction served you well.

 

Rev

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Rev:
Originally Posted by Riya:

My books are Mills and Boon and Harlequin Romance

 

riya's fantasy Jason Statham

 

I can prove that study wrong. I'm attracted to Daniel Craig, Jason Statham and SRK 365 days!


* Well riya, you were surely right when you said you liked your men "ruggedly handsome."hahaha

 

* Those romance Mills and Boon fiction served you well.

 

Rev


Hai Ram! I just fainted

darn, darn, darn! God took his sweet time and made this man. Sigh.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Rev, SRK is very talented. One year he was the four nominees for best actor. Never seen that before. But you are right. He did not have the looks like his contemporary Hritik Roshan.

Kzaaz, don't confuse talent with stardom. SRK is one-dimensional - he rarely acts with range like he did in Chak de India.

 

Meryl Streep has talent and none can touch her; Demi Moore has stardom. Madonna has stardom but Cindy Lauper was a better singer.

 

Hollywood actors who combined both talent and stardom - Marlon Brando and Tom Cruise. The closest thing Bollywood has would be Amitabh Bachan and to some extent Aamir Khan. Shah Rouk? put his name on a movie and it draws a crowd; but as he said once while accepting an award "you want to see power, go see Amitabh in Black"!

Kari
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Rev, SRK is very talented. One year he was the four nominees for best actor. Never seen that before. But you are right. He did not have the looks like his contemporary Hritik Roshan.

Kzaaz, don't confuse talent with stardom. SRK is one-dimensional - he rarely acts with range like he did in Chak de India.

 

Meryl Streep has talent and none can touch her; Demi Moore has stardom. Madonna has stardom but Cindy Lauper was a better singer.

 

Hollywood actors who combined both talent and stardom - Marlon Brando and Tom Cruise. The closest thing Bollywood has would be Amitabh Bachan and to some extent Aamir Khan. Shah Rouk? put his name on a movie and it draws a crowd; but as he said once while accepting an award "you want to see power, go see Amitabh in Black"!

Bai, we talking Bollywood. If you want to combine them no one in the world come close to Amitabh for acting and no one in the world come close to Rafi and Lata for singing. But since we are talking Bollywood and SRK, to say that he is a star but not talented is incorrect. For that I draw your attention to Mohabbatein during some of his scenes with Amitabh.

FM
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Originally Posted by Kari:
Originally Posted by ksazma:
Rev, SRK is very talented. One year he was the four nominees for best actor. Never seen that before. But you are right. He did not have the looks like his contemporary Hritik Roshan.

Kzaaz, don't confuse talent with stardom. SRK is one-dimensional - he rarely acts with range like he did in Chak de India.

 

Meryl Streep has talent and none can touch her; Demi Moore has stardom. Madonna has stardom but Cindy Lauper was a better singer.

 

Hollywood actors who combined both talent and stardom - Marlon Brando and Tom Cruise. The closest thing Bollywood has would be Amitabh Bachan and to some extent Aamir Khan. Shah Rouk? put his name on a movie and it draws a crowd; but as he said once while accepting an award "you want to see power, go see Amitabh in Black"!

Bai, we talking Bollywood. If you want to combine them no one in the world come close to Amitabh for acting and no one in the world come close to Rafi and Lata for singing. But since we are talking Bollywood and SRK, to say that he is a star but not talented is incorrect. For that I draw your attention to Mohabbatein during some of his scenes with Amitabh.

Kzaazzzz, I  say he is one-dimensional. He lacks range. His buffoonery as a grown man walking around like a high school boy with back-back and pretend basketball was ludicrous - and he even brought that image to one of his tours to New York.

 

You have to look at the body of work of Aamir Khan (who only gets involved in movies with good scripts) and Irfaan Khan, and see the deficiencies in Shah Rukh Khan's acting.

Kari

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×