Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Nehru,

I'm happy with the result as a human being who believes in people living their own lives without the excessive and unnecessary interference of others.

However, I know bad law when I see it. This ruling bases the conclusion on the ill defined and often abused "due process" clause of the fifteenth amendment. Basically, this is made up law. If you can make this up then you can make up practically anything.
FM
Originally Posted by Kapadilla:
Originally Posted by Nehru:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
What do you think of the ruling Itaname? The merits of the case that is. Not just the result.

He is happy, like they all should be. You know anyone else who is celebrating??

Aya hear dis keera mout daaag! 

Nehru is gay and doesn't know it. In the period I've been reading here I've seen his multiple invitations to have sex with men. He's ignorantly gay...if there was ever such a thing. LOL.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
Aunty Kneeru displays a very Greco-Roman approach to homosexuality. He seems to be under the impression that only the catcher is "gay" while the pitcher maintains his straightness

EXACTLY! Then he runs around flaunting his homosexuality and sexual prowess WITH MEN as though it were a badge of honor. LMAO!

FM
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

Your thread title is facetious.

 

There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal.  That is sheer wickedness.

 

Don't drink the cool aid.

 

Keep your soberness and sense of balance.

I really don't care what they do to themselves but I am very opposed to them adopting or having "surrogate" kids. 

FM

How about when they teach your grandchildren in Kindergarten that Heather has 2 mommies and the teacher reads "King and King" to them in class about 2 princes marrying?  You would be OK with that.  They have been doing that already.

 

What will you tell grandchildren when they see the vulgar gay scenes on TV? How will you explain that to your pre-K child or grandchild.  This is our wickedness what they did today.

FM
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

How about when they teach your grandchildren in Kindergarten that Heather has 2 mommies and the teacher reads "King and King" to them in class about 2 princes marrying?  You would be OK with that.  They have been doing that already.

 

What will you tell grandchildren when they see the vulgar gay scenes on TV? How will you explain that to your pre-K child or grandchild.  This is our wickedness what they did today.

I don't agree with this too.  Like I said I don't care if they marry and have social benefits but it should stop there.  Obviously the laws that are passed allow them full rights such as having kids which makes me sick.

FM
I invite you two saltwater Yankees to take a read of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Equal Protection Clause guarantees equal protection of the law for all Americans.

The word "marriage" may not be there but if the right to marry is a fundamental right then everyone enjoys said right equally and may not be deprived of it without Due Process.

In other words, a gay person is entitled to be treated the same as a straight person.

If you lot are against gay marriage, do what I do. Don't marry gay people! It really is that simple.
FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
I invite you two saltwater Yankees to take a read of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Equal Protection Clause guarantees equal protection of the law for all Americans.

The word "marriage" may not be there but if the right to marry is a fundamental right then everyone enjoys said right equally and may not be deprived of it without Due Process.

In other words, a gay person is entitled to be treated the same as a straight person.

If you lot are against gay marriage, do what I do. Don't marry gay people! It really is that simple.

Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
I invite you two saltwater Yankees to take a read of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Equal Protection Clause guarantees equal protection of the law for all Americans.

The word "marriage" may not be there but if the right to marry is a fundamental right then everyone enjoys said right equally and may not be deprived of it without Due Process.

In other words, a gay person is entitled to be treated the same as a straight person.

If you lot are against gay marriage, do what I do. Don't marry gay people! It really is that simple.

Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.

I agree with you on this one,I have seen some with kids.

Django
Originally Posted by Django:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
I invite you two saltwater Yankees to take a read of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Equal Protection Clause guarantees equal protection of the law for all Americans.

The word "marriage" may not be there but if the right to marry is a fundamental right then everyone enjoys said right equally and may not be deprived of it without Due Process.

In other words, a gay person is entitled to be treated the same as a straight person.

If you lot are against gay marriage, do what I do. Don't marry gay people! It really is that simple.

Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.

I agree with you on this one,I have seen some with kids.

I have seen some heterosexuals with children and wonder why were they ever given the power to procreate.

cain
Cobra,

People are genetically predisposed when it comes to sexuality. I don't think straight people get "converted" to being gay. And vice versa.

Don't we have a mutual cousin who is extremely gay but grew up in a very straight very Christian/Muslim household? Aunty Rena's unmarried middle aged Indian son who sports ladies purses? I believe he's our gay cousin bai.
FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

Your thread title is facetious.

 

There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal.  That is sheer wickedness.

 

Don't drink the cool aid.

 

Keep your soberness and sense of balance.

I really don't care what they do to themselves but I am very opposed to them adopting or having "surrogate" kids. 

Why? Being gay does not mean they are pedophiles? One is more likely to find those in with equal frequency among heterosexuals.

FM
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

The idea is to perpetuate this debauchery so we become a nation of reprobates.  Thy adopt other people's children and have their "pretend families."

 

This is recruitment and gay evangelism.

quit the sanctimopnous bullshit! Gay people are not predisposed to evil more than any other human. Their lifestyle may not fit your ethics but I am sure there are areas of contempt for you as reprobate among other similarly disposed misguided people who would think you unworthy by race or creed or some nonsensical cultural habit. Our ancestors lived as non persons for hundreds of generations because some fool believe they were born in the wrong caste. Hinduism does not pay the same obsessive attention to sexuality as western christian nations did. You are adopting Christian attitudes towards sexuality rather than what is native to you culturally. Hinduism created a special category of a third gender for them, the hijra ( accepted as legally so in india)

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by antabanta:
Originally Posted by VVP:

Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.

That assumes homosexuality is behavioral and not biological.

It could biological but don't get children involved in that household.

FM
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

Your thread title is facetious.

 

There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal.  That is sheer wickedness.

 

Don't drink the cool aid.

 

Keep your soberness and sense of balance.

I really don't care what they do to themselves but I am very opposed to them adopting or having "surrogate" kids. 

Why? Being gay does not mean they are pedophiles? One is more likely to find those in with equal frequency among heterosexuals.

All I am saying is don't put a kid in a captive "gay" environment.  Would you want your kid to grow up in a gay household?  Those kids are usually traumatized in school when other kids know they have gay parents.  No child should have to go through this shit because they were adopted by gays.

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:

 Those kids are usually traumatized in school when other kids know they have gay parents.  No child should have to go through this shit because they were adopted by gays.

And that is exactly the problem that needs to be rectified.

That is no different from a non-white kid being tormented by white kids.

Why does that happen? Why should people have to endure that for being different?

A
Last edited by antabanta
VVP,

Don't you think we should teach kids not to be mean bullies to others?

Don't you wanna be part of a world where this kind of infantile uncivilized behavior is a thing of the past?

Decades ago it was ok to pick on minority races in majority white schools. Now that's considered as grounds for disciplinary action. Is it so much to extend that idea to other minority groups?
FM
Originally Posted by antabanta:
Originally Posted by VVP:

 Those kids are usually traumatized in school when other kids know they have gay parents.  No child should have to go through this shit because they were adopted by gays.

And that is exactly the problem that needs to be rectified.

Very very difficult when the courts decide that marriage mean a union between any two people because marriage means you can have children.  The should have passed a law for "civil union" or something like that that gives them all the social benefits.

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Jay Bharrat:

Your thread title is facetious.

 

There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal.  That is sheer wickedness.

 

Don't drink the cool aid.

 

Keep your soberness and sense of balance.

I really don't care what they do to themselves but I am very opposed to them adopting or having "surrogate" kids. 

Why? Being gay does not mean they are pedophiles? One is more likely to find those in with equal frequency among heterosexuals.

All I am saying is don't put a kid in a captive "gay" environment.  Would you want your kid to grow up in a gay household?  Those kids are usually traumatized in school when other kids know they have gay parents.  No child should have to go through this shit because they were adopted by gays.

Kids in schools have cliques and traumatize each other for anything  remotely fitting their fancy. It can be anything from a crooked tooth to a quiet personality. Being Gay is the least of the worry and these days the idea that one should respect anther's sexuality  as a private matter is getting across. If the 10 percent population number holds as the portion of the people that are gay.... we need to reconcile that is in our quibbling.

FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
VVP,

Don't you think we should teach kids not to be mean bullies to others?

Don't you wanna be part of a world where this kind of infantile uncivilized behavior is a thing of the past?

Decades ago it was ok to pick on minority races in majority white schools. Now that's considered as grounds for disciplinary action. Is it so much to extend that idea to other minority groups?

There is a difference between theory and reality.  Any sort of bullyism is ground for disciplinary actions.  The fact is kids from gays homes are targeted by all races and genders.  Why should these gay people allowed to have children in their household?

FM
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
VVP,

Don't you think we should teach kids not to be mean bullies to others?

Don't you wanna be part of a world where this kind of infantile uncivilized behavior is a thing of the past?

Decades ago it was ok to pick on minority races in majority white schools. Now that's considered as grounds for disciplinary action. Is it so much to extend that idea to other minority groups?

There is a difference between theory and reality.  Any sort of bullyism is ground for disciplinary actions.  The fact is kids from gays homes are targeted by all races and genders.  Why should these gay people allowed to have children in their household?

I cannot say I grew up with a tolerance for gay people. That came late in life as sought I  to overcome the illogic of it.

 

My children on the other hand do not blink when it comes to gay person. They do not see it as a problem.

FM
Last edited by Former Member
Originally Posted by Stormborn:
Originally Posted by VVP:
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
VVP,

Don't you think we should teach kids not to be mean bullies to others?

Don't you wanna be part of a world where this kind of infantile uncivilized behavior is a thing of the past?

Decades ago it was ok to pick on minority races in majority white schools. Now that's considered as grounds for disciplinary action. Is it so much to extend that idea to other minority groups?

There is a difference between theory and reality.  Any sort of bullyism is ground for disciplinary actions.  The fact is kids from gays homes are targeted by all races and genders.  Why should these gay people allowed to have children in their household?

I cannot say I grew up with a tolerance for gay people. That came late in life as sought I  to overcome the illogic of it.

 

My children on the other hand do not blink when it comes to gay person. They do not see it as a problem.

I am indifferent to them.  I understand it could be biological driven.  My problem is don't get children involved.  It could be brutal on those kids in early school life.  To me this is different from racial targeting because for the simple reason that those kids are in the super minority and has not support.

FM
Last edited by Former Member

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×