- Share on Facebook
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Pinterest
- Share on LinkedIn
- Share on Reddit
- Copy Link to Topic
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Them Republicans got back to back defeats
Come over leh meh JACK YOU UP PRAPA!!!
Come over leh meh JACK YOU UP PRAPA!!!
Your Gaumontship,
You do realize that having sex with another man makes you a homosexual, right? Or at the very least bisexual.
I haven't had the time to read anything on it yet. Just heard the decision.
He is happy, like they all should be. You know anyone else who is celebrating??
He is happy, like they all should be. You know anyone else who is celebrating??
Aya hear dis keera mout daaag!
forgot to add to my previous post - curious of the effects on state's rights and how they addressed that.
I'm happy with the result as a human being who believes in people living their own lives without the excessive and unnecessary interference of others.
However, I know bad law when I see it. This ruling bases the conclusion on the ill defined and often abused "due process" clause of the fifteenth amendment. Basically, this is made up law. If you can make this up then you can make up practically anything.
He is happy, like they all should be. You know anyone else who is celebrating??
Aya hear dis keera mout daaag!
Nehru is gay and doesn't know it. In the period I've been reading here I've seen his multiple invitations to have sex with men. He's ignorantly gay...if there was ever such a thing. LOL.
You do know that we're from the same family eh Cousinx2?
Oh rass ayo is fambly, soon now he goin invite you to come ova and bugga the gaumont queen
EXACTLY! Then he runs around flaunting his homosexuality and sexual prowess WITH MEN as though it were a badge of honor. LMAO!
Your thread title is facetious.
There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal. That is sheer wickedness.
Don't drink the cool aid.
Keep your soberness and sense of balance.
Your thread title is facetious.
There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal. That is sheer wickedness.
Don't drink the cool aid.
Keep your soberness and sense of balance.
I really don't care what they do to themselves but I am very opposed to them adopting or having "surrogate" kids.
How about when they teach your grandchildren in Kindergarten that Heather has 2 mommies and the teacher reads "King and King" to them in class about 2 princes marrying? You would be OK with that. They have been doing that already.
What will you tell grandchildren when they see the vulgar gay scenes on TV? How will you explain that to your pre-K child or grandchild. This is our wickedness what they did today.
How about when they teach your grandchildren in Kindergarten that Heather has 2 mommies and the teacher reads "King and King" to them in class about 2 princes marrying? You would be OK with that. They have been doing that already.
What will you tell grandchildren when they see the vulgar gay scenes on TV? How will you explain that to your pre-K child or grandchild. This is our wickedness what they did today.
I don't agree with this too. Like I said I don't care if they marry and have social benefits but it should stop there. Obviously the laws that are passed allow them full rights such as having kids which makes me sick.
The word "marriage" may not be there but if the right to marry is a fundamental right then everyone enjoys said right equally and may not be deprived of it without Due Process.
In other words, a gay person is entitled to be treated the same as a straight person.
If you lot are against gay marriage, do what I do. Don't marry gay people! It really is that simple.
The word "marriage" may not be there but if the right to marry is a fundamental right then everyone enjoys said right equally and may not be deprived of it without Due Process.
In other words, a gay person is entitled to be treated the same as a straight person.
If you lot are against gay marriage, do what I do. Don't marry gay people! It really is that simple.
Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.
The word "marriage" may not be there but if the right to marry is a fundamental right then everyone enjoys said right equally and may not be deprived of it without Due Process.
In other words, a gay person is entitled to be treated the same as a straight person.
If you lot are against gay marriage, do what I do. Don't marry gay people! It really is that simple.
Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.
I agree with you on this one,I have seen some with kids.
The word "marriage" may not be there but if the right to marry is a fundamental right then everyone enjoys said right equally and may not be deprived of it without Due Process.
In other words, a gay person is entitled to be treated the same as a straight person.
If you lot are against gay marriage, do what I do. Don't marry gay people! It really is that simple.
Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.
I agree with you on this one,I have seen some with kids.
I have seen some heterosexuals with children and wonder why were they ever given the power to procreate.
The idea is to perpetuate this debauchery so we become a nation of reprobates. Thy adopt other people's children and have their "pretend families."
This is recruitment and gay evangelism.
Oh rass ayo is fambly, soon now he goin invite you to come ova and bugga the gaumont queen
nehru a gaumont queen ha ha ha
The idea is to perpetuate this debauchery so we become a nation of reprobates. Thy adopt other people's children and have their "pretend families."
This is recruitment and gay evangelism.
Jay.. i have seen a lesbo couple one pregnant,they are not only
adopting.
That's abuse to the whole country.
Django, you can bet that lesbian was not impregnated by another lesbian.
Wickedness is now cool.
Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.
That assumes homosexuality is behavioral and not biological.
People are genetically predisposed when it comes to sexuality. I don't think straight people get "converted" to being gay. And vice versa.
Don't we have a mutual cousin who is extremely gay but grew up in a very straight very Christian/Muslim household? Aunty Rena's unmarried middle aged Indian son who sports ladies purses? I believe he's our gay cousin bai.
That would apply to everyone else. Any other pearls of wisdom?
sure the children is better off starving
How did dis ting happen chap?
God, ah hope he doan marry a Black guy now
Oi Bobra, next time you "run into" Aunt Rena's son, give im one a dem football luv tap...you know the one ah mean? You jus give the bamsy a nice lite tap an give 'e a wink....
I bet dah gay cousin of ours can put some real cutrass pon abbe Snake
I think dah bai just live at the gym unlike the Snake here
Your thread title is facetious.
There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal. That is sheer wickedness.
Don't drink the cool aid.
Keep your soberness and sense of balance.
I really don't care what they do to themselves but I am very opposed to them adopting or having "surrogate" kids.
Why? Being gay does not mean they are pedophiles? One is more likely to find those in with equal frequency among heterosexuals.
The idea is to perpetuate this debauchery so we become a nation of reprobates. Thy adopt other people's children and have their "pretend families."
This is recruitment and gay evangelism.
quit the sanctimopnous bullshit! Gay people are not predisposed to evil more than any other human. Their lifestyle may not fit your ethics but I am sure there are areas of contempt for you as reprobate among other similarly disposed misguided people who would think you unworthy by race or creed or some nonsensical cultural habit. Our ancestors lived as non persons for hundreds of generations because some fool believe they were born in the wrong caste. Hinduism does not pay the same obsessive attention to sexuality as western christian nations did. You are adopting Christian attitudes towards sexuality rather than what is native to you culturally. Hinduism created a special category of a third gender for them, the hijra ( accepted as legally so in india)
YES!!!! That child is in a captive situation. Let them bugga themselves and make their own children.
Like I said, I don't care a rass if they marry and bugga one another 100 times a day BUT they should not have children living in the house.
That assumes homosexuality is behavioral and not biological.
It could biological but don't get children involved in that household.
Your thread title is facetious.
There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal. That is sheer wickedness.
Don't drink the cool aid.
Keep your soberness and sense of balance.
I really don't care what they do to themselves but I am very opposed to them adopting or having "surrogate" kids.
Why? Being gay does not mean they are pedophiles? One is more likely to find those in with equal frequency among heterosexuals.
All I am saying is don't put a kid in a captive "gay" environment. Would you want your kid to grow up in a gay household? Those kids are usually traumatized in school when other kids know they have gay parents. No child should have to go through this shit because they were adopted by gays.
Those kids are usually traumatized in school when other kids know they have gay parents. No child should have to go through this shit because they were adopted by gays.
And that is exactly the problem that needs to be rectified.
That is no different from a non-white kid being tormented by white kids.
Why does that happen? Why should people have to endure that for being different?
Don't you think we should teach kids not to be mean bullies to others?
Don't you wanna be part of a world where this kind of infantile uncivilized behavior is a thing of the past?
Decades ago it was ok to pick on minority races in majority white schools. Now that's considered as grounds for disciplinary action. Is it so much to extend that idea to other minority groups?
Those kids are usually traumatized in school when other kids know they have gay parents. No child should have to go through this shit because they were adopted by gays.
And that is exactly the problem that needs to be rectified.
Very very difficult when the courts decide that marriage mean a union between any two people because marriage means you can have children. The should have passed a law for "civil union" or something like that that gives them all the social benefits.
Your thread title is facetious.
There is nothing common sense about buggery and homo being normal. That is sheer wickedness.
Don't drink the cool aid.
Keep your soberness and sense of balance.
I really don't care what they do to themselves but I am very opposed to them adopting or having "surrogate" kids.
Why? Being gay does not mean they are pedophiles? One is more likely to find those in with equal frequency among heterosexuals.
All I am saying is don't put a kid in a captive "gay" environment. Would you want your kid to grow up in a gay household? Those kids are usually traumatized in school when other kids know they have gay parents. No child should have to go through this shit because they were adopted by gays.
Kids in schools have cliques and traumatize each other for anything remotely fitting their fancy. It can be anything from a crooked tooth to a quiet personality. Being Gay is the least of the worry and these days the idea that one should respect anther's sexuality as a private matter is getting across. If the 10 percent population number holds as the portion of the people that are gay.... we need to reconcile that is in our quibbling.
Don't you think we should teach kids not to be mean bullies to others?
Don't you wanna be part of a world where this kind of infantile uncivilized behavior is a thing of the past?
Decades ago it was ok to pick on minority races in majority white schools. Now that's considered as grounds for disciplinary action. Is it so much to extend that idea to other minority groups?
There is a difference between theory and reality. Any sort of bullyism is ground for disciplinary actions. The fact is kids from gays homes are targeted by all races and genders. Why should these gay people allowed to have children in their household?
Don't you think we should teach kids not to be mean bullies to others?
Don't you wanna be part of a world where this kind of infantile uncivilized behavior is a thing of the past?
Decades ago it was ok to pick on minority races in majority white schools. Now that's considered as grounds for disciplinary action. Is it so much to extend that idea to other minority groups?
There is a difference between theory and reality. Any sort of bullyism is ground for disciplinary actions. The fact is kids from gays homes are targeted by all races and genders. Why should these gay people allowed to have children in their household?
I cannot say I grew up with a tolerance for gay people. That came late in life as sought I to overcome the illogic of it.
My children on the other hand do not blink when it comes to gay person. They do not see it as a problem.
Don't you think we should teach kids not to be mean bullies to others?
Don't you wanna be part of a world where this kind of infantile uncivilized behavior is a thing of the past?
Decades ago it was ok to pick on minority races in majority white schools. Now that's considered as grounds for disciplinary action. Is it so much to extend that idea to other minority groups?
There is a difference between theory and reality. Any sort of bullyism is ground for disciplinary actions. The fact is kids from gays homes are targeted by all races and genders. Why should these gay people allowed to have children in their household?
I cannot say I grew up with a tolerance for gay people. That came late in life as sought I to overcome the illogic of it.
My children on the other hand do not blink when it comes to gay person. They do not see it as a problem.
I am indifferent to them. I understand it could be biological driven. My problem is don't get children involved. It could be brutal on those kids in early school life. To me this is different from racial targeting because for the simple reason that those kids are in the super minority and has not support.