Skip to main content

FM
Former Member

All of you are deeply mistaken. The AG is a very intelligent man. Trust me.

 

If the AG is as clever as I know him to be, then I suspect he will be creating issues which he can litigate in case the PPP loses the elections.

 

Guyana does have precedent that an election held under unconstitutional conditions can be nullified by the courts after the holding of that election.

 

Once again, the PNC was kind enough to create this precedent.

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
I suspect the PPP is fabricating evidence of election irregularities.

A better strategy would be a wholesale attack on the constitutionality of the elections since they were called prior to Parliament's dissolution.

In which case the PPP would be admitting to an unconstitutional act by President Donald Rabindranath Ramotar.

FM
I agree Fish.

Basil Williams, Professor Duke Pollard, former Justice of the CCJ among many others said that the date was unconstitutional.

However abbe bright bai Nandababa swore it was perfectly constitutional.

Now they have a choice and it seems they're trying to remain consistent even at the price of surrendering their bestest legal argument. I don't know why all of a sudden a lil hypocrisy bothers them.
FM
Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
The 1997 Elections was declared unconstitutional and as a consequence was deemed "null and void." However, this judgment was handed down in 2001 while the country was once again in the midst of fresh elections.

So Janet Jagan was denied pension after that?  I don't think you have the whole thing correct.  I don't think the entire results were deemed "null and void" maybe only certain processes.

FM

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×