i happen to agree with the proposition that 33 is a “majority” in a 65-seat house, even for a no-confidence motion
but it is sheer wickedness on your part to characterize the actions of the Gov’t as “villainy” when there is respected legal opinion and precedent in and out of Guyana that supports the other position
that is why we have Courts
this is not about a “scheme” or mathematics . . . it is about LAW and government
why are y’all behaving like a coercive uncivilized mob?
I see no reason to characterize it otherwise. I considered Anil's suit to insist a refusal of a budget line item is akin to rejecting the whole document similarly as vile. This should be a time they close up shop, sent their agents our and begin to campaign in earnest. Instead they are leaving the nation in doubt as though they are in possession of a constitutional gem and are smart to pull a rabbit out of a hat. The reality they are being dunces by arguing an absurdity
This is not like Ramotar proroguing parliament to avoid a NCV and we called that vile. Ramotar had that right. There is no moral value in what they are doing even if it is to extend he time in office before suspending parliament.
They will still have to vote in 90 days. Highlighting gets the nation goat going and paints them unfavorably and pedantic and disingenuous nits. Using the law to skirt the law is always a vile and amoral thing.
If you do not like being called names that can be taken negatively to race and ethnicity please refrained from calling anyone uncivilized. It demeans you. I bloody well know what it means to be civil and I am presently arguing a viewpoint from a logical and rational perspective and you are taking cover in this pretense to being of some superior virtue. I leave that kind of behavior for Ugli.