Skip to main content

Reply to "Wismar contextualized with the 1964 low-intensity tribal war . . . Eusi Kwayana is correct - there is no guilty "RACE""

Django posted:
caribny posted:
Django posted:

When one look at history of British Guiana, now Guyana for 124 yrs,  [with the introduction East Indians as indentured labor in 1838] Africans and East Indians lived among each other, for that matter all ethnicity were living and bonding together with out any major troubles.In struggles against the Colonial Masters they bond together fighting for their rights.


Guyanese must cease this nonsense that "we all got on before Burnham and Cheddi".  I am old enough to know when a man like me would have only worked at Fogarty's, Bookers offices in GT, or in a bank as a watch man. Do you think that blacks liked that?  No they didn't.  And this is why they were determined to ensure that they had control when independence came.

Carib,

I was able to find some old British Guiana documents from the 1800's and first half of 1900's, which i am reading, i am looking for the conflicts between the people you are mentioning, currently i can't find any serious distrust.

 

Bai, Cribby is always making stuff up. 

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×