Skip to main content

Reply to "Wismar contextualized with the 1964 low-intensity tribal war . . . Eusi Kwayana is correct - there is no guilty "RACE""

Iguana posted:
VishMahabir posted:

Dude...

you have an obsession and a fetish for this race thing...now you gone "nit-picking" for terrorism....

First you invoke a dead man, Daley Bisnate, now you referencing an old man who probably have faint memory about that event.

Who cares if it was "PPP" or "PNC" bombs?

We know what your sole purpose here is...

you representing the Black KKK views trying to incite the Indo KKKs into reinvoking another cyber race war reflective of the one that took place 60 years age...most of us were not even born yet...

Indos got their Wismar, Afros got Son Chapmann...let it rest...a COI was done...why you starting shyte after several threads were dedicated to this already?

You should focus your energy on how to prevent such a tragedy....

If you got nothing useful to do....go watch the Memorial Day Parade...thats where I am going...

Posters should let this thread die a slow death...useless dribble.

Banna, ah kno yuh gat ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder - I spelled it out just suh yuh wouldn't ask what it means), but you gotta be an idiot if you don't see the postings of the rabid indo kkk screaming and distorting hay.

Nobody denying the events in Wismar and the violence directed toward Indians by Afro Guyanese. But to describe it as a massacre where 3,000 indian people died is dishonest at least.

And here you come wid yuh numbskull ramblings, jumping pon de band wagon talking shit and admonishing people about use of words like "racist" whilst restraining yuhself from addressing the indian RACISTS busy sullying their mattie Indians by distorting facts.

Dude...

I said this was an over-reach. AND, I noted this was not a "massacre". There was no massacre of 3,000 people. It was a pogrom that uprooted an entire village. Most sane people can gather this much from reading the COI. 

There is guilt on both sides....

What is the point in you and your sidekick belaboring this point?

 

V
×
×
×
×
×
×