Skip to main content

Reply to "Wismar contextualized with the 1964 low-intensity tribal war . . . Eusi Kwayana is correct - there is no guilty "RACE""

Bibi Haniffa posted:
caribny posted:
VishMahabir posted:

 

 

 

Again,

the use of "massacre" is overreach....but this is how one person described it in a letter..

This is NOT how one person describes it.  This is how the PPP spreads this as they attempt to deny that the PYO were not a bunch of savage hooligans who engaged in numerous acts of racially inspired terror, and that they weren't armed and trained by the Castro regime.

You attack ronan and not dave. Why?  Is it that you wish to allow the PPP to spread its usually lie that they didn't also play a massive role in our tribal civil war, painting only the PNC as the instigators?

Clearly yes so cease pretending that you are objective.  You are an Indian who accidentally ended up with black relatives and I increasingly believe that you don't like them.  Your pattern of "bad black man, good Indo" is too consistent for me to believe otherwise.

How do you know our Student of the Year has black relatives?  And if he does, why do you have a problem with that?

1.  He claims to be a Dougla.  By definition he must have black relatives. He is however clearly Indo identified so I acknowledge this by calling him an Indo as he clearly doesn't empathize with his Afro ancestry.

2.  I think that you have a problem with that because I certainly didn't attribute anything negative to that fact.

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×