Originally Posted by Shaitaan:
This woman was at the center of every abuse of the judiciary and the degradation of the law for the past decade.
She used her powers to protect child molesters, rapists, and murderers.
Why is she allowed to stay?
Not a word about replacing his cretin.
She used her powers to protect child molesters, rapists, and murderers.
Why is she allowed to stay?
Not a word about replacing his cretin.
the DPP is a constitutional office; removal is, for the most part, in the hands of the Judicial Service Commission . . . with all that implies
i don't think i need to explain why your "Why is she allowed to stay?" is tendentiously premature and risibly anti-knowledge
smh