Skip to main content

Reply to "What is so wrong with H2H registration besides buying time?"

Stormborn posted:
ronan posted:
Stormborn posted:
Django posted:

Voters list can be deemed fraudulent, when deceased and migrants names are still listed.

From since 2006 corrections should have been made, seems nothing have been done. There are skulduggery where ID cards  of Immigrants and the deceased, are being used to vote.

Fraud implies deliberate intent do commit a crime. This list is "corrupted", the term any technology person would use. To sanitize it would be to take steps to remove the dead folks and those who left the jurisdiction as well as add to it those who are not on it. This is what GECOM exists for. It is their job the only mandate they have. It is a failure through neglect or disinterest or laziness that the list is corrupted.

BTW you do not correct a list by discarding it and create an new one. The problems with registration could by itself be corrupting.Canvassers can be care less, people could be missed for not being at home, out of the jurisdiction or simply refuse. Accuracy is enhanced by keeping the old list, purging it of dead and those who left from official lists of the same.  Such a list maintained over an extended period will always be more accurate than H2H. Historical data over extended periods means one can run regression analysis to ferret out all sorts of anomalies. 

hmmm . . . how exactly was prior H2H not "corrupting"?

Answer about past H2H not necessary since we are not interrogating the past and I am not responsible for the failures to object to it then. History aids  auto correcting by virtue of the past being prologue.

untethered stupidness and jibber jabber . . . what nonsense!

banna tek a seat

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×