ksazma posted:Django posted:
That's correct,were it not for the illegal Burnham 1980 Constitution which the PPP embrtaced dearly,they could not have been the ruling government.
It's ironic some folks castigate Burnham "the rigger of elections" and on the other hand worships the illegal document which was designed for a winner take all government.
Django bai, which party then would have been the ruling government between 1992 and 2015 had it not been for Burnham's 1980 Constitution? How could the PPP on their own change that Constitution between 1992 and 2015. Why then has the Coalition not changed it since taking office in 2015. They don't seem to be too busy that they don't have the time to do so.
Good Sunday morning humor with your question,
hint from 2011 there would have been a changes government and probably prior to that, last sentence is a form of deflection defending the PPP,were there any real push by the PPP to toss out the constitution? do the math,if there were any intentions by the PPP to change or toss out the constitution.