Skip to main content

Reply to "There will be no Retroactive Chaos if No-Confidence vote is overturned"

kp posted:
D2 posted:
kp posted:
D2 posted:
Nehru posted:

They are accustomed to deal with DUMMIES at Congress Place so they think we stupid. DUMB FOOLS!!!!1

dude get the..fu. ck of the site with these nonsensical one liners that serves only to harass others and derail conversation. You are not a dummy and have the wherewithal to speak with some though but you instead only persist in being a perpetual ass where every conversation is concerned. 

You are Brilliant, expressing your self in a vulgar manner. Some of you choose to come on GNI to practice your Lil School English hopefully to impress midgets . I choose to push the envelope to see how ignorant simple minds react. If you are looking for an audience, then be a school teacher.

What is vulgar is not my consternation in the post but the abject indifference with which propriety is disregarded and childish behavior by men of beyond median age behave. If you persistently disrespect your other board members by being disruptive you need to be cussed out. 

My English is beyond your capacity or the capacity of most here to reproduce. It is so because its aims is at clarity and not inanities as is typical of those whose trade is in the arena of of the of partisan abuse or idiotic rants.

If you want to appear sensible and coherent then you may begin to write clearly what you intends and with practice you would soon forget you were an incoherent ass most of the time when you disrespect others intentionally.

You will be surprised with whom you are blogging on GNI, keep on fooling yourself that you are the brightest bulb in the chandelier . Maybe, just maybe you are playing ketch up on you missed out school days displaying your English here that was rejected by your teacher. 

 I am here to scold delinquent juveniles, yes, I get kicks to see big men grovel and misbehave behind a keyboard.

Do you think at this time in my life I defer to specialists? I doubt you are some seminal thinker gracing us with obligatory wisdom since you participate in overt nonsense most of the time.  However since you brought the idea to the table;  I have not met anyone  that is so intellectually towering that I am cowered in their presence. The same should be the experience for everyone here who has contemplated what it is to be an honorable man or woman and have moral positions.

I have learned to defer to an individual's  specialized understanding about a thing but I also understand genius in specialized areas do not mean synoptic vision. Those individuals can include  those who are not moral or fully formed humans beings we would want as our friends. Einstein, Shockley, Crick all monumental thinkers in their fields but all fell short as good human beings.

Another aspect of this idea about deference to position or stature  is the reality  that what is good or bad for humanity  is  accessible to everyone, learned and unlearned.  Philosophical ideas as to good and bad has not changed and what these are is the  framework in every culture. What changes is how we approach them. 

You do not scold anyone by being perverse and insulting. You scold them by developing sensible themes that may interest then that is never made clear to them. They may not accept it now but somewhere down the line, having been informed about it they may able to take advantage of an opportunity dependent on the advice. 

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×