Django posted:ksazma posted:
What can be said of Granger's judgment for unanimously picking old man Patterson who already had one foot in the grave to be an impediment to GECOM operations? Looks like not only was old man Patterson who was not fit and proper but so is Granger.
Granger was looking for a Judge, also he claims it's Constitutional. The Judicial branch of government agreed,HIS ACTIONS WAS CONSTITUTIONAL.
There is disagreement the GECOM chairman to be a judge, any other persons with such qualities fits.
That is all fine now. He, however, picked someone who was clearly not fit and now that he seems to be in collusion with the PNC to stymy the elections, is also not proper.