Reply to "The PPP apologists now stand EXPOSED! . . . their Law and Order Pose a Casualty of Class, Ethnic Preference and Gross Race Politics"

VishMahabir posted:

 Banna, 

I hold no brief for those people accused of corruption. Its simple: they guilty, they go to jail. Like I said…Guyana needs a cleansing of the soul. The poor soul at the bottom of the barrel needs to see politicians go to jail. Everybody knows that corruption abounds in Guyana.
Good Good, so far

But there is the double standard here...and you wonder why the “PPP apologists” here are not seeing what you are seeing. You are guilty of this double standard that you accuse others of..
ok . . . you're still in preamble; i'm waiting for the substance of your brief

So read this slowly before you start throwing invectives at people who you label "apologists".
halfway thru your post and i'm still waiting for your substance . . .

In case you have not noticed, in Guyana, there are PPP apologists and there are PNC apologists. You seem to be blinded by that part of the reality. Nothing in your responses indicate your acknowledgement of this fact.
the subject of my post is "PPP apologists" . . . if I wanted to talk about PNC apologists, i would have created another thread

Your statement reeks of infantilism and someone devoid of a sense of history.
your attempt at "insult" is noted and gave me a chuckle

Like Kwayana said Guyanese act like there are “no guilty race”
you fatally misread Eusi . . . which indicates to me that you likely have not properly read anything he has written

So think about this statement you made:   their Law and Order Pose a Casualty of Class, Ethnic Preference and Gross Race Politics
ok, i'm thinking . . . 

So how much of the above do you attribute to the 28 years of PNC rule?.
probably a lot; and it's not a good place for them to hang their hats . . . not sure what stupid point you are making here

Surely, your history did not start in 1992, or did it?
see previous

And spare us….dont act stupid by resorting to cut and paste from above to argue with yourself.
cringeworthy lame and incoherent; but i appreciate that you want to 'conclude' with a rhetorical flourish . . . one day you'll learn how to do that like a boss

pick sense out of nonsense above

[pls. forgive grammatical and composition errors in my original post, i was in-transit posting on a quirky iPad]