Skip to main content

Reply to "The Guyana dilemma"

caribny posted:
ksazma posted:
 

Carib bai, why didn't the PNC years through 1992 help to elevate blacks? Even Corbin when he was at Home Affairs Ministry used to bum me for money.

If you were honest and not the lying dawg that you are you would know that I considered Burnham to be severely damaging towards blacks.

Of course ample poverty exists among Indians, with growing social pathology in this group. So how is the PPP benefiting them? Why between 1992 and 2012 did the population of Berbice shrink by 30%.

IMHO Guyana is cursed with some of the worst governance because of its traditions of race voting.

Where did I say that you did not consider Burnham to be severely damaging towards blacks?

We have already established that the PPP govern democratically and prosperously whereas the PNC did not. The argument isn't why Indians support the PPP because they can point to that record. The question was why blacks support the PNC when they have not accomplished anything beneficial for Guyana or its citizens in 50 years. It is then reasonable to believe that blacks support the PNC mainly because it is predominantly black thereby making them more racist than Indians. Plus more Indians have crossed the race line than blacks during elections so your argument that Indians are more racist than blacks is grossly inaccurate.

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×