Skip to main content

Reply to "Serious Question"

D2 posted:
Drugb posted:
D2 posted:
Drugb posted:
Don't blame me, see the link I provided, no mention of africa is made. I guess you know more than the folks at London Global university.

I think you should expand your reading and not settle for what you think confirms your prejudices.

So the folks at London Global were liars or you are just smarter?

They just were not complete for whatever reason. I have not asserted any dispositions to them. That is your take.  I sent you one by the NIH so using your reasoning should I say you believe you are smarter than the scientists at the institute? You are a knuckle headed man. You have been that way all along so it has to be true about old dogs and new tricks. I however think it is will full ignorance. You cannot accept a mistake so you insist on erasing an entire history of a people and sell it as fact. 

Or maybe you and NIH along with the granger brown nosers are mistaken? The prevailing consensus among scientists is that rice cultivation began in China, not Africa as you seem to want to believe despite the evidence that shows otherwise. 

 

Based on archeological evidence, rice was believed to have first been domesticated in the region of the Yangtze River valley in China. Morphological studies of rice phytoliths from the Diaotonghuan archaeological site clearly show the transition from the collection of wild rice to the cultivation of domesticated rice.
 
FM
×
×
×
×
×
×