ksazma posted:Django posted:ksazma posted:Django posted:Dave posted:So why you didn’t hold Ganger feet to the fire ... you playing you Rass nah .
Granger is a decent leader ,not like the rabble rouser shooting bullcrap to look impressive.
How is Granger a decent leader when he violated the constitution at least three times in the past 4+ years?
Secondly, prior to Jagdeo becoming President, the constitution did not limit the President to only two terms. Jagdeo as President amended it so that a President can serve for only two terms. Given that Granger violated the constitution at least three times in the past 4+ years, it is reasonable to conclude that had he been President in 2000 rather than Jagdeo that constitution would still be allowing Presidents to serve more than two terms. There is nothing decent about Granger. He is not even as decent as Jagdeo who NEVER violated the constitution.
Read this 2019/07/2019-CCJ-14-AJ.pdf
Then we can talk ,again on this matter.
I just responded to it. The CCJ bitchslapped the Coalition in that entire ruling.
Read paragraph [ 5 ] and [ 7 ]