Reply to "real old exercise book"

Stormborn posted:

ronan posted:

Stormborn posted:

Pedantry will not make you smart or avoid the implication that burnham seeing beyond others does not imply some genius. That is what he said. He say farther than others implying the man had some insight that gluten was dangerous hence rice flour was the better choice. You dunces need to find fault by nit picking not by actual argumentation

ahmmm, actually, "what he said" was "Burnham was ahead of his time in many ways" which he goes on to contextualize

you passed that through the "imply" grinder in your anus and came up with "Burnham was a genius" . . . all the better to do your Don Quixote lance and windmills thing and impress the Nehrus and Ksazmas on GNI that your hate of fatbai burns hotter than theirs

surely there are more intelligent ways to 'achieve' that kind of fame, no?

saddling up a crude LIE in tin armor in further pursuit only marks you as BOGUS and INFANTILE by even the most casual discerning

you now reduced to whining that those exposing your shame are "nitpicking" and being "pedantic" because they are not playing by your situational, low IQ 'rules' of "actual argumentation"

smfh

Story done. You can parse it however. It is what I stated that matters to me and I believe I conveyed my message succinctly.

uh huh

stepping up to a discerning big man while wearing panty is not smart

you'll learn . . . eventually