Skip to main content

Reply to "real old exercise book"

ronan posted:
Stormborn posted:
ronan posted:
Stormborn posted:
Iguana posted:
In so doing, you got your ass handed to you. You do not know the difference between the math formulas and what was at the back of the exercise book. In fact I highly doubt you ever saw the back of a Guyanese exercise book in the Burnham era. And you grossly misrepresented what William Blake meant and took a sound thrashing from Ronan on it.
I did not misrepresent what Blake said. I stated that I was  transposing William Blake on truth to speak of  good intentions  with stupidly poor results beating all the bad you can invent.

ahmmm, this is what you said:

"What good are good intentions? Transposing William Blake on truth; good intentions with stupidly poor results beats all the bad you can invent"

there is NO SUCH from William Blake!

and further, i will go as far as to suggest you google up what "transpose" means

you seem not to know, but bray anyway

as i said before . . . you deep deep inside nothing-to-lose territory in this extended effort to outrun shame

a naked fraud

smfh

I know what I said and if you knew Blake you would see it is  as I said, twisting a common quote to of his to suit my purposes. 

ahhhh . . . the "quote" the quote, the quote

the "common quote" that you hiding in your bt and will not share

oh wait . . . a glimmering

"twisting a common quote to of his to suit my purposes"

methinks this is wan trial balloon for an 'escape' route . . . hmmm?

lol

As I said, it was a common quote from one of the most widely known of the romantic poets. You need crutches to pretend you are well read. I do not. 

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×