ronan posted:Stormborn posted:ronan posted:Stormborn posted:ronan posted:yuh friken lash bad bad, eh?
let me be clear you fraud, this is not about "Blake"
it's about your posing . . . your lightweight stupidity
thinking people not paying attention to your pretense at deep 'learning'
the stupidity you attempted to sidestep by claiming you merely "mangled" the quote
however the "quote" properly referencing the situation of "Burnham" contextualized by your exchange with Iguana DOES NOT EXIST . . . at least not by William Blake
and your "google fu" has now made you aware of that, no?
too late
it's strangely sad to watch you tap dance like this
afraid of you? Not even the middling scholar who came through here and I have argued with most.
no, not me banna
yuh friken lash banna, L A S H . . . and all the embarrassment that goes with it
that's why you running away . . . that's why you promising to give us the quote in "a couple of weeks"
because you SET YOURSELF UP
look how your posts gettin stupider by the minute bai . . . yuh ego not handling well
at all
What a fool...cheering because he thinks Blake did not inspire the quote when as I said it is common place
so now William Blake only "inspire the [phantom] quote" that you "transpose"
hmmmmm?
are you for real banna? . . . you fully confusing yuhself now
tap tap tapitty tap
well, just for shits and giggles, let me play dis wan out
suh, is who [inspired by Blake] "common place" quote you want me to "google" bai?
smfh
a few of his phrases are lifted whole cloth fool!