caribny posted:VishMahabir posted:
Notwithstanding Hinds other comments, my question still stands: How do the PNC continue to defend the fact that mainly Indians are being relieved of their positions,
If 8 out of 10 heads were Indians and 6 were removed now why wouldn't there have been mainly Indians removed? This was revealed when Trotman didn't deny that this was the case when asked by Nigel Hughes.
APNU/AFC did also remove blacks, like the one in charge of Go Invest. But clearly most of the people removed would have been Indian.
This was discussed many times but it will still be questioned until the nect election. This is one reason some Indians are called racist..I would more liken it to stupidity.