Notwithstanding Hinds other comments, my question still stands: How do the PNC continue to defend the fact that mainly Indians are being relieved of their positions,
If 8 out of 10 heads were Indians and 6 were removed now why wouldn't there have been mainly Indians removed? This was revealed when Trotman didn't deny that this was the case when asked by Nigel Hughes.
APNU/AFC did also remove blacks, like the one in charge of Go Invest. But clearly most of the people removed would have been Indian.
What would have been more appropriate is if you cited specific Indians who were competent and who were fired only because they were Indians.
People like you denied that Indians were put in almost all top positions in Guyana during the PPP era, and especially after Jagdeo took over.