Reply to "‘PPP/C APPEAL DOOMED’"

TotaramSenior Member

@Rochelle posted:
This is the same man who was quick to say the CCJ had jurisdiction, which led to the CCJ explicitly admonishing all attorneys to ensure they not peddle this idea to their supporters. The CCJ was speaking directly to Nandlall and his social platform.
Isn't it fascinating that Nandlall didn't object to the QC's opinion, just to the fact that he made such a statement. Even he knows its a losing battle.

Isn't it interesting how Nandlall criticizes Prof. Alexis for allegedly violating the sub judice rule while he, Nandlall, engages in it?

6/28/207:27 PM

<ul id="{%=id%}ButtonGroup" class="button-group h-popup-buttons even-button-group even-1">
    <li id="{%=id%}Okay_buttonContainer"><a id="{%=id%}Okay" href="javascript:void(0);" class="button success no-margin-bottom h-alert-modal-ok-button" role="button">OK</a><script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            function {%=id%}Okay_click(event, data) {
            {%=id%}Popup.hide();
        }
        
                $('#{%=id%}Okay').on('click', {%=id%}Okay_click);
        })();
    </script></li></ul><a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close-reveal-modal" aria-label="Close Modal">&#215;</a><div class="last-modal-focus focus-utility-element" tabindex="0"></div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            {%=id%}Popup = new SS.Popup.ModalPopup('{%=id%}');
        })();
    </script>

Skip to main content

Membership Required

Remove From Your Block List

Manage Follow Preferences

Block

Premium Membership Required

GNI VIP Member

Please wait...