Billy Ram Balgobin posted:Mars posted:Did you call them unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP? Like Chang's bogus ruling for Jagdeo's third term for which he probably received a ton of cash. Yes, let it go to the CCJ and when you clowns are disappointed with the CCJ's ruling you will scream that black man ruled against you.I disagreed with the court's decision on Jagdeo's third term. I applauded the CCJ's decision denying the former pres. from running again. Granger is hell-bent on choosing someone who will support the PNC's plan to rig the general elections. We have a disgraceful history of fraudulent elections. We cannot allow this Granger man to take this country back to where it was under the Kabaka. Patterson's appointment was done in the most undemocratic way.
Did you call the court unfair and corrupt when they were ruling in favor of the PPP in the third term case? Granger just followed what was inserted into the constitution by the PPP. They wrote the plan B clause but they thought that they'd be in power forever. Now their own clause in the constitution blew up in their faces. Looks like their legal minds weren't too bright when they inserted that clause into the constitution. The local courts ruled that Granger was acting in a lawful manner and soon the CCJ will do the same. Then what? The goat will be crying that black man racial and ruled against him.
Ask the PPP how democratic they were when they refused to hold LGE which was against the Constitution. Then they appointed their own lackeys to run the village councils.