Django posted:ksazma posted:Django posted:Dave posted:Django posted:Look like i have to pull the video of the Town Hall meeting.
You can provide what ever videos, the US Ambassador is on record condemning Granger government for violating the constitution. However, where is the evidence to support Meeks . that’s what you need to show.
It's not only Meeks ,it's the Congressional team that came to the conclusion. The US ambassador can withdraw her statement , after having discussions with the US Congressional team that visited Guyana. What ever is on record at the time is gone.
That team does not negate the CCJ’s ruling just because they visited Guyana. Why are you minimizing the CCJ’s ruling when that is Guyana’s highest court of law?
Who arguing about the CCJ. That's the view of the US Congressional team.
Exactly. The CCJ ruled that Granger violated the Constitution. These fools pictured below said he didn't. I say the CCJ is correct and these fools are dead wrong. You should write to them as inquire if they understand the Guyana constitution.
