Skip to main content

Reply to "No evidence of any constitutional violation by APNU - AFC Gov't. US Congressional ,recent fact finding mission to Guyana."

Dave posted:
Django posted:
ksazma posted:
Django posted:
Dave posted:
Django posted:

Look like i have to pull the video of the Town Hall meeting.

You can provide what ever videos, the US Ambassador is on record condemning Granger government for violating the constitution. However, where is the evidence to support Meeks . that’s what you need to show. 

It's not only Meeks ,it's the Congressional team that came to the conclusion. The US ambassador can withdraw her statement , after having discussions with the US Congressional team that visited Guyana. What ever is on record at the time is gone.

That team does not negate the CCJ’s ruling just because they visited Guyana. Why are you minimizing the CCJ’s ruling when that is Guyana’s highest court of law?

Who arguing about the CCJ. That's the view of the US Congressional team.

You guys funny t@rass ,picture like a picture when the US Congressional team visited Jagdeo. When Rubio office made a statement ,every one flying high. The statement not in favor ,all kind negativity coming forth.

The Afro Guyanese in NYC ,have more connection with politicians in the US ,than the Indo Guyanese . Bibi can probably attest.

You seems to be missing the BIG picture hay … This congressional team is quoting the US Ambassador .. rite.

Answer these two questions.

1. Did the US Ambassador issue any statement to justify these congressional members, who said the following  … "that the US ambassador affirms the conclusion that the Granger Government  did not breached the constitution."

2. Didn't the US Ambassador accused the Granger government of breaching the constitution and Granger and his foreign affairs minister issue strong statement against US.  

I have already explained the answers to both of the questions in my posts. If you missed it ,will restate.

The US Ambassador don't have to make a public statement.The discussions between the US Congressional team and the US Ambassador is enough. The Congressional team can make a declaration for the US Ambassador change of mind,which was done in the public.

Hopefully my explanations can put the matter to rest.

Django
Last edited by Django
×
×
×
×
×
×