Skip to main content

Reply to "Local gov’t chair defends unilateral appointment of city Town Clerk - ‘I am the Commission between meetings’"

@Spugum posted:

the proof is in petition #99 that the ppp and sections of the media are desparate not to have the courts order an investigation into. in fact, they hang on to the technicality that granger wasn't served with a copy of the petition on time. that's your proof that the ppp didn't rig - hiding behind a trivial technicality. and the 47 boxes with no statutory documents, what about those, it didn't happen?

one day it will all catch up with them. god forbid the appeal court decide that it has jurisdiction to hear the pitition cases - like the ccj decided it had to hear cases on elections in guyana - you'll see the ppp run to the ccj again to try to stop the appeal court. desperate to cover up their lies

FYI The courts decision are based on facts not allegations, jumbies and anomalies , you got be an idiot to believe PPP and media can hinder a  court investigation order.

Those 47 polling station is not in the interior so they had observers from not only local contesting parties but also from Caricom, OAS, EU and around the world who witnessed the signing of SOPs that the PPP placed online on March 2, 2020 which consequently matches the recount.

So how the PNC hand picked gecom employees handled the documents after the signing  is their business, they can wiped dem kakahole with it but that cannot change the numbers on the carbon copies of SOPs witness, signed, handed out and displayed on the polling stations for the public, reporters etc.

Why the PNC would not to this day show their copy of SOPs?  The stench of pnc shit on it is too strong for the public....hahahahaha [maniacal laughter]

×
×
×
×
×