Skip to main content

Reply to "Letter: The purported Charandass’ confession"

Dave posted:

So, let’s for discussion purposes say that The CCJ  buys into that asinine reason that Charandass was an illegal occupant on December 21st hence his vote was null and void, then here is the real case scenario; then, the government has to go back and change all bills and decisions where charandass’ vote merited passage through the house. It means that all decisions in the house involving Charandass has to be revoked, thats the law. Seeing Courts cannot make retroactive rulings, hence the original high court ruling stands.

trivial nonsense . . . there is no need to “rule” a “go back and change” for previous bills the ‘illegals’ voted on

the VERY GOOD reason being that Guyana has a List system where rogue MPs can LEGALLY be removed/replaced by the sponsoring Party . . . Charrandas’ ejection from Parliament by the AFC is THE case in point

naturally, the possibility for different results re previous votes are therefore exactly ZERO!

the governing principle

any Court worth the name would know that, and ignore stupidness from poor intellects like yours and the SIMPLETON letter writer in its deliberations

i have dealt with this elsewhere

try to keep up

FM
×
×
×
×
×
×