Skip to main content

Reply to "Jagdeo has revealed the new PPP agenda – Ramkarran"

The question is whether some group of people needs to take back a country from another group or foreign threats. Jagdeo is attempting to define the reasons for the PPP "taking back" Guyana from the PNC. HEe states that PPP supporters - Indian-Guyanese - are targeted worse than under Burnham. This means that Indians are not free to express themselves; unable to find government employment unless they join the PNC; have their economic interests (internal commerce, farming, fishing, transportation, construction, etc.) restricted, armed forces intimidation, etc.

Having defined the reasons for a take back of this country, Jagdeo needs to then outline how. Wait for the next elections? Mass civil protests? Armed insurrection?

Then Jagdeo has to establish if ny taking back this country he will then enslave the others, incorporate them in a meaningful way or exterminate them.

You see, the likes of Bibi, Cobra et al, have the answers for the above. They believe that the Coalition government is unlawful and treasonous. Seems familiar? The Obama Administration the last 8 years? There must be conflict in the PPP camp with those who sees the Obama Administration as legitimate.

Is Jagdeo, having taken over and reshaped the PPP into a new PPP, treasonous? Is there an Act of law that addresses "taking back"; Guyana? Surely Jagdeo invites some legal action.

Kari
×
×
×
×
×
×